complaint to a warning and providing a helpful node in the case where
the "template<>" header is redundant because the corresponding
template-id refers to an explicit specialization. C++0x might still
change this behavior, and existing practice is all over the place on
the number of "template<>" headers actually needed.
llvm-svn: 89651
than tweaking existing ASTs, since we were (*gasp*) stomping on ASTs
within templates. I'm glad we found this little stick of TNT early...
llvm-svn: 89475
A::f
that occurs within a non-static member function with a type-dependent
"this", don't consider this to be a case for introduction of an
implicit "(*this)." to refer to a specific member function unless we
know (at template definition time) that A is a base class of *this.
There is some disagreement here between GCC, EDG, and Clang about the
handling of this case. I believe that Clang now has the correct,
literal interpretation of the standard, but have asked for
clarification (c++std-core-15483).
llvm-svn: 89425
incomplete array initialization, where we have the following in a
template:
int a[] = { 1, 2, something-value-dependent };
// ...
sizeof(a);
The type of "a" appears to be a non-dependent IncompleteArrayType, but
treating it as such makes the sizeof(a) fail at template definition
time. We now correctly handle this by morphing the IncompleteArrayType
into a DependentSizedArrayType with a NULL expression, indicating that
its size has no corresponding expression (and, therefore, the type is
distinct from others).
llvm-svn: 89366
Also, make the "don't know how to instantiate a particular kind of
declaration" diagnostic nicer, so we don't have to trap Clang in a
debugger to figure out what went wrong.
llvm-svn: 89050
like a copy constructor to the overload set, just ignore it. This
ensures that we don't try to use such a constructor as a copy
constructor *without* triggering diagnostics at the point of
declaration.
Note that we *do* diagnose such copy constructors when explicitly
written by the user (e.g., as an explicit specialization).
llvm-svn: 88733
non-type template parameters or constants of pointer-to-member
type. Once checked, be sure to retain those pointer-to-member
constants as expressions if they are dependent, or as declarations if
they are not dependent.
llvm-svn: 87010
member type (e.g., T Class::*Member), build a pointer-to-member
constant expression. Previously, we we just building a simple
declaration reference expression, which meant that the expression was
not treated as a pointer to member.
llvm-svn: 87000
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine if we have a redeclaration
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine if we have equivalent
template template parameters
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine whether a template
template argument is valid for a given template template parameter.
Previously, we did not distinguish between the last two cases, which
got us into trouble when we were looking for exact type matches
between the types of non-type template parameters that were dependent
types. Now we do, so we properly delay checking of template template
arguments until instantiation time.
Also, fix an accidental fall-through in a case statement that was
causing crashes.
llvm-svn: 86992
template template parameter.
When building a template-id type, check whether the template-name
itself is dependent (even if the template arguments are not!) and
handle it as a template-id type.
llvm-svn: 86913
annotation token, because some of the tokens we're annotating might
not be in the set of cached tokens (we could have consumed them
unconditionally).
Also, move the tentative parsing from ParseTemplateTemplateArgument
into the one caller that needs it, improving recovery.
llvm-svn: 86904
permits, among other things, ripping apart and reconstructing
templates via partial specialization:
template<typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst { typedef T type; };
template<typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst<const T> {
typedef typename DeepRemoveConst<T>::type type;
};
template<template<typename> class TT, typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst<TT<T> > {
typedef TT<typename DeepRemoveConst<T>::type> type;
};
Also, fix a longstanding thinko in the code handling partial ordering
of class template partial specializations. We were performing the
second deduction without clearing out the results of the first
deduction. It's amazing we got through so much code with such a
horrendous error :(
llvm-svn: 86893
with its corresponding template parameter. This can happen when we
performed some substitution into the default template argument and
what we had doesn't match any more, e.g.,
template<int> struct A;
template<typename T, template<T> class X = A> class B;
B<long> b;
Previously, we'd emit a pretty but disembodied diagnostic showing how
the default argument didn't match the template parameter. The
diagnostic was good, but nothing tied it to the *use* of the default
argument in "B<long>". This commit fixes that.
Also, tweak the counting of active template instantiations to avoid
counting non-instantiation records, such as those we create for
(surprise!) checking default arguments, instantiating default
arguments, and performing substitutions as part of template argument
deduction.
llvm-svn: 86884
template template parameter, substitute any prior template arguments
into the template template parameter. This, for example, allows us to
properly check the template template argument for a class such as:
template<typename T, template<T Value> class X> struct Foo;
The actual implementation of this feature was trivial; most of the
change is dedicated to giving decent diagnostics when this
substitution goes horribly wrong. We now get a note like:
note: while substituting prior template arguments into template
template parameter 'X' [with T = float]
As part of this change, enabled some very pedantic checking when
comparing template template parameter lists, which shook out a bug in
our overly-eager checking of default arguments of template template
parameters. We now perform only minimal checking of such default
arguments when they are initially parsed.
llvm-svn: 86864
nested-name-specifiers so that they don't gobble the template name (or
operator-function-id) unless there is also a
template-argument-list. For example, given
T::template apply
we would previously consume both "template" and "apply" as part of
parsing the nested-name-specifier, then error when we see that there
is no "<" starting a template argument list. Now, we parse such
constructs tentatively, and back off if the "<" is not present. This
allows us to parse dependent template names as one would use them for,
e.g., template template parameters:
template<typename T, template<class> class X = T::template apply>
struct MetaSomething;
Also, test default arguments for template template parameters.
llvm-svn: 86841
parameters. Rather than storing them as either declarations (for the
non-dependent case) or expressions (for the dependent case), we now
(always) store them as TemplateNames.
The primary change here is to add a new kind of TemplateArgument,
which stores a TemplateName. However, making that change ripples to
every switch on a TemplateArgument's kind, also affecting
TemplateArgumentLocInfo/TemplateArgumentLoc, default template
arguments for template template parameters, type-checking of template
template arguments, etc.
This change is light on testing. It should fix several pre-existing
problems with template template parameters, such as:
- the inability to use dependent template names as template template
arguments
- template template parameter default arguments cannot be
instantiation
However, there are enough pieces missing that more implementation is
required before we can adequately test template template parameters.
llvm-svn: 86777
templates. The instantiation of these default arguments must be (and
now, is) delayed until the template argument is actually used, at
which point we substitute all levels of template arguments
concurrently.
llvm-svn: 86578
(without complaining if it fails) to get proper semantics: reference
binding with a derived-to-base conversion and the enumeration of
constructors for user-defined conversions. There are probably more
cases to fix, but my prior attempt at statically ensuring that
complete-type checking always happens failed. Perhaps I'll try again.
With this change, Clang can parse include/llvm/*.h!
llvm-svn: 86129
still be dependent or invoke an overloaded operator. Previously, we
only supported builtin operators.
BinaryOperator/CompoundAssignOperator didn't have this issue because
we always built a CXXOperatorCallExpr node, even when name lookup
didn't find any functions to save until instantiation time. Now, that
code builds a BinaryOperator or CompoundAssignOperator rather than a
CXXOperatorCallExpr, to save some space.
llvm-svn: 86087
type of the object even when it is dependent. Specifically, this makes
sure that we get the right type for "this->", which is important when
performing name lookup into this scope to determine whether an
identifier or operator-function-id is a template name.
llvm-svn: 86060
expressions, keep track of whether we are immediately taking the
address of the expression. Pass this flag when building a declaration
name expression so that we handle pointer-to-member constants
properly.
llvm-svn: 86017
operators, e.g.,
operator+<int>
which now works in declarators, id-expressions, and member access
expressions. This commit only implements the non-dependent case, where
we can resolve the template-id to an actual declaration.
llvm-svn: 85966
representation of a C++ unqualified-id, along with a single parsing
function (Parser::ParseUnqualifiedId) that will parse all of the
various forms of unqualified-id in C++.
Replace the representation of the declarator name in Declarator with
the new UnqualifiedId class, simplifying declarator-id parsing
considerably and providing more source-location information to
Sema. In the future, I hope to migrate all of the other
unqualified-id-parsing code over to this single representation, then
begin to merge actions that are currently only different because we
didn't have a unqualified notion of the name in the parser.
llvm-svn: 85851
integral constant expression, make sure to find where the initializer
was provided---inside or outside the class definition---since that can
affect whether we have an integral constant expression (and, we need
to see the initializer itself).
llvm-svn: 85741
that is not known to be a base class at template definition time due
to some dependent base class. Treat qualified name lookup that refers
to a non-static data member or function as implicit class member
access when the "this" type would be dependent.
llvm-svn: 85718
parameters and template type parameters, which occurs when
substituting into the declarations of member templates inside class
templates. This eliminates errors about our inability to "reduce
non-type template parameter depth", fixing PR5311.
Also fixes a bug when instantiating a template type parameter
declaration in a member template, where we weren't properly reducing
the template parameter's depth.
LLVM's StringSwitch header now parses.
llvm-svn: 85669
instantiation once we have committed to performing the
instantiation. As part of this, make our makeshift
template-instantiation location information suck slightly less.
Fixes PR5264.
llvm-svn: 85209
so that we maintain better source information after template argument
deduction and overloading resolves down to a specific
declaration. Found and dealt with a few more cases that
FixOverloadedFunctionReference didn't cope with.
(Finally) added a test case that puts together this change with the
DeclRefExpr change to (optionally) include nested-name-specifiers and
explicit template argument lists.
llvm-svn: 84974
CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl to check for
redeclarations/instantiations. Also fixes a longstanding issue where
our explicit-instantiation location information wasn't as good as it
could have been.
llvm-svn: 84216
template, make sure to get the template that corresponds to *this*
declaration of the class template or specialization, rather than the
canonical specialization. Fixes PR5187.
llvm-svn: 84119
to a member operator template. We missed updating this call site when
adding support for function templates; bug exposed by a test for
PR5072.
llvm-svn: 84111
unknown type name, e.g.,
foo::bar x;
when "bar" does not refer to a type in "foo".
With this change, the parser now calls into the action to perform
diagnostics and can try to recover by substituting in an appropriate
type. For example, this allows us to easily diagnose some missing
"typename" specifiers, which we now do:
test/SemaCXX/unknown-type-name.cpp:29:1: error: missing 'typename'
prior to dependent type name 'A<T>::type'
A<T>::type A<T>::f() { return type(); }
^~~~~~~~~~
typename
Fixes PR3990.
llvm-svn: 84053
what we found when we looked into <blah>", where <blah> is a
DeclContext*. We can now format DeclContext*'s in nice ways, e.g.,
"namespace N", "the global namespace", "'class Foo'".
This is part of PR3990, but we're not quite there yet.
llvm-svn: 84028
function templates.
This commit ensures that friend function templates are constructed as
FunctionTemplateDecls rather than partial FunctionDecls (as they
previously were). It then implements template instantiation for friend
function templates, injecting the friend function template only when
no previous declaration exists at the time of instantiation.
Oh, and make sure that explicit specialization declarations are not
friends.
llvm-svn: 83970
injected-class-name (e.g., when we're referring to other
specializations of the current class template). Make sure that we see
the template rather than the injected-class-name. Fixes PR4768.
llvm-svn: 83672
function of a class template was implicitly instantiated, explicitly
instantiated (declaration or definition), or explicitly
specialized. The same MemberSpecializationInfo structure will be used
for static data members and member classes as well.
llvm-svn: 83509
templates. Previously, these weren't handled as specializations at
all. The AST for representing these as specializations is still a work
in progress.
llvm-svn: 83498
declarations and explicit template instantiations, improving
diagnostics and making the code usable for function template
specializations (as well as class template specializations and partial
specializations).
llvm-svn: 83436
overload candidates (but not the built-in ones). We still rely on the
underlying built-in semantic analysis to produce the initial
diagnostic, then print the candidates following that diagnostic.
One side advantage of this approach is that we can perform more validation
of C++'s operator overloading with built-in candidates vs. the
semantic analysis for those built-in operators: when there are no
viable candidates, we know to expect an error from the built-in
operator handling code. Otherwise, we are not modeling the built-in
semantics properly within operator overloading. This is checked as:
assert(Result.isInvalid() &&
"C++ binary operator overloading is missing
candidates!");
if (Result.isInvalid())
PrintOverloadCandidates(CandidateSet, /*OnlyViable=*/false);
The assert() catches cases where we're wrong in a +Asserts build. The
"if" makes sure that, if this happens in a production clang
(-Asserts), we still build the proper built-in operator and continue
on our merry way. This is effectively what happened before this
change, but we've added the assert() to catch more flies.
llvm-svn: 83175
specializations such as:
friend class std::vector<int>;
by using the same code path as explicit specializations, customized to
reference an existing ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl (or build a new
"undeclared" one).
llvm-svn: 82875
class templates. We now treat friend class templates much more like
normal class templates, except that they still get special name lookup
rules. Fixes PR5057 and eliminates a bunch of spurious diagnostics in
<iostream>.
llvm-svn: 82848
template void f<int>(int);
~~~~~~
Previously, we silently dropped the template arguments. With this
change, we now use the template arguments (when available) as the
explicitly-specified template arguments used to aid template argument
deduction for explicit template instantiations.
llvm-svn: 82806
member functions of class template specializations, and static data
members. The mechanics are (mostly) present, but the semantic analysis
is very weak.
llvm-svn: 82789
value-dependent. Audit (and fixed) all calls to
Expr::isNullPointerConstant() to provide the correct behavior with
value-dependent expressions. Fixes PR5041 and a crash in libstdc++
<locale>.
In the same vein, properly compute value- and type-dependence for
ChooseExpr. Fixes PR4996.
llvm-svn: 82748
first implementation recognizes when a function declaration is an
explicit function template specialization (based on the presence of a
template<> header), performs template argument deduction + ambiguity
resolution to determine which template is being specialized, and hooks
There are many caveats here:
- We completely and totally drop any explicitly-specified template
arguments on the floor
- We don't diagnose any of the extra semantic things that we should
diagnose.
- I haven't looked to see that we're getting the right linkage for
explicit specializations
On a happy note, this silences a bunch of errors that show up in
libstdc++'s <iostream>, although Clang still can't get through the
entire header.
llvm-svn: 82728
when we are not instantiating the corresponding "current
instantiation." This happens, e.g., when we are instantiating a
declaration reference that refers into the "current instantiation" but
occurs in a default function argument. The libstdc++ vector default
constructor now instantiates properly.
llvm-svn: 82069
point at the template and print out its template arguments, e.g.,
ambiguous-ovl-print.cpp:5:8: note: candidate function template specialization
[with T = int]
void f(T*, long);
llvm-svn: 81907
instantiation definition can follow an explicit instantiation
declaration. This is as far as I want to go with extern templates now,
but they will still need quite a bit more work to get all of the C++0x
semantics right.
llvm-svn: 81573
- Diagnose attempts to add default arguments to templates (or member
functions of templates) after the initial declaration (DR217).
- Improve diagnostics when a default argument is redefined. Now, the
note will always point at the place where the default argument was
previously defined, rather than pointing to the most recent
declaration of the function.
llvm-svn: 81548
from its location. Initialize appropriately.
When implicitly creating a declaration of a class template specialization
after encountering the first reference to it, use the pattern class's
location instead of the location of the first reference.
llvm-svn: 81515
templates, e.g.,
x.template get<T>
We can now parse these, represent them within an UnresolvedMemberExpr
expression, then instantiate that expression node in simple cases.
This allows us to stumble through parsing LLVM's Casting.h.
llvm-svn: 81300
Now that parsing, semantic analysis, and (I think) code generation of
pseudo-destructor expressions and explicit destructor calls works,
update the example-dynarray.cpp test to destroy the objects it
allocates and update the test to actually compile + link.
The code seems correct, but the Clang-compiled version dies with a
malloc error. Time to debug!
llvm-svn: 81025
expressions, e.g.,
p->~T()
when p is a pointer to a scalar type.
We don't currently diagnose errors when pseudo-destructor expressions
are used in any way other than by forming a call.
llvm-svn: 81009
things, this means that we can properly cope with member access
expressions such as
t->operator T()
where T is a template parameter (or other dependent type).
llvm-svn: 80957
involve qualified names, e.g., x->Base::f. We now maintain enough
information in the AST to compare the results of the name lookup of
"Base" in the scope of the postfix-expression (determined at template
definition time) and in the type of the object expression.
llvm-svn: 80953
with to properly support member access expressions in templates. This
test is XFAIL'd, because we get it completely wrong, but I've made the
minimal changes to the representation to at least avoid a crash.
llvm-svn: 80856
x->Base::f
We no longer try to "enter" the context of the type that "x" points
to. Instead, we drag that object type through the parser and pass it
into the Sema routines that need to know how to perform lookup within
member access expressions.
We now implement most of the crazy name lookup rules in C++
[basic.lookup.classref] for non-templated code, including performing
lookup both in the context of the type referred to by the member
access and in the scope of the member access itself and then detecting
ambiguities when the two lookups collide (p1 and p4; p3 and p7 are
still TODO). This change also corrects our handling of name lookup
within template arguments of template-ids inside the
nested-name-specifier (p6; we used to look into the scope of the
object expression for them) and fixes PR4703.
I have disabled some tests that involve member access expressions
where the object expression has dependent type, because we don't yet
have the ability to describe dependent nested-name-specifiers starting
with an identifier.
llvm-svn: 80843
simple-template-id form), check whether the scope specifier is
computable as a declaration context rather than checking whether it is
dependent, so that we properly cope with members of the current
instantiation.
Improve testing for typename specifiers that terminate in a
simpe-template-id.
llvm-svn: 80783
to a multi-level template argument list by making it explicit. The
forced auditing of callers found a bug in the instantiation of member
classes inside member templates.
I *love* static type systems.
llvm-svn: 80391
When performing template instantiation of the definitions of member
templates (or members thereof), we build a data structure containing
the template arguments from each "level" of template
instantiation. During template instantiation, we substitute all levels
of template arguments simultaneously.
llvm-svn: 80389
Douglas Gregor