This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed, but avoid breaking developers using and
vendors shipping libc++.
The method used is to guard transitive includes based on the
C++ language version. For the upcoming C++23 we can remove
headers when we want, but for other language versions we try
to keep it to a minimum.
In this code the transitive include of `<chrono>` is removed
since D128577 introduces a header cycle between `<format>`
and `<chrono>`. This cycle is indirectly required by the
Standard. Our cycle dependency tool basically is a grep based
tool, so it needs some hints to ignore cycles. With the input
of our transitive include tests we can create a better tool.
However that's out of the scope of this patch.
Note the flag `_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` remains
unchanged. So users can still opt-out of transitives includes
entirely.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132284
This commit re-adds transitive includes that had been removed by
4cd04d1687, c36870c8e7, a83f4b9cda, 1458458b55, 2e2f3158c6,
and 489637e66d. This should cover almost all the includes that had
been removed since LLVM 14 and that would contribute to breaking user
code when releasing LLVM 15.
It is possible to disable the inclusion of these headers by defining
_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES. The intent is that vendors will
enable that macro and start fixing downstream issues immediately. We
can then remove the macro (and the transitive includes) by default in
a future release. That way, we will break users only once by removing
transitive includes in bulk instead of doing it bit by bit a every
release, which is more disruptive for users.
Note 1: The set of headers to re-add was found by re-generating the
transitive include test on a checkout of release/14.x, which
provided the list of all transitive includes we used to provide.
Note 2: Several includes of <vector>, <optional>, <array> and <unordered_map>
have been added in this commit. These transitive inclusions were
added when we implemented boyer_moore_searcher in <functional>.
Note 3: This is a best effort patch to try and resolve downstream breakage
caused since branching LLVM 14. I wasn't able to perfectly mirror
transitive includes in LLVM 14 for a few headers, so I added a
release note explaining it. To summarize, adding boyer_moore_searcher
created a bunch of circular dependencies, so we have to break
backwards compatibility in a few cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128661
We should not surface CMake-level options like LIBCXX_ENABLE_FILESYSTEM
to our users, since they don't know what it means. Instead, use a slightly
more general wording.
Also, add an error in <ios> to improve the quality of errors for people
trying to use <iostream> when localization is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125910
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
All supported compilers have implemented this feature.
Therefore use the language version instead of the feature macro.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119865
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
Some headers which require the version header depend on other headers to
provide it. Include the version header in all top-level headers to make
sure a header cleanup can't remove the version header.
Note this doesn't add the version header to the c headers.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116172
Clang is gaining `auto(x)` support in D113393; sadly there
seems to be no feature-test macro for it. Zhihao is opening
a core issue for that macro.
Use `_LIBCPP_AUTO_CAST` where C++20 specifies we should use `auto(x)`;
stop using `__decay_copy(x)` in those places.
In fact, remove `__decay_copy` entirely. As of C++20, it's purely
a paper specification tool signifying "Return just `x`, but it was
perfect-forwarded, so we understand you're going to have to call
its move-constructor sometimes." I believe there's no reason we'd
ever need to do its operation explicitly in code.
This heisenbugs away a test failure on MinGW; see D112214.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115686
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
We don't use double underscores for private header names when they are
in a subdirectory with double underscores already.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108820
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
This affects only vectors with weird/malicious allocators,
the same corner case covered in D91708, but for `vector<bool>` this time.
Also ADL-proof <__tree>, which affects only sets and maps with weird/malicious
allocators where the ADL trap is in the *fancy pointer type*.
Also drive-by _VSTD:: qualification in the guts of std::bind,
std::packaged_task, std::condition_variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93424
Everywhere, normalize the whitespace to `::new (EXPR) T`.
Everywhere, normalize the spelling of the cast to `(void*)EXPR`.
Without the cast to `(void*)`, the expression triggers ADL on GCC.
(I think this is a GCC bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249)
Even if it doesn't trigger ADL, it still seems incorrect to use any argument
that's not exactly `(void*)` because that opens the possibility of overload
resolution picking a user-defined overload of `operator new`, which would be
wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93153
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides variadic templates
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support variadic templates.
This effectively gets rid of all uses of _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS, but
some workarounds for the lack of variadics remain.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
This change fixes errors reported by Control Flow Integrity (CFI) checking when using `std::packaged_task`. The errors mostly stem from casting the underlying storage (`__buf_`) to `__base*`, even if it is uninitialized. The solution is to wrap `__base*` access to `__buf_` behind a getter marked with _LIBCPP_NO_CFI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82627
Summary:
The former are like:
libcxx/include/typeinfo:322:11: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'bad_cast' is deprecated because it has a user-declared destructor [-Wdeprecated-copy-dtor]
virtual ~bad_cast() _NOEXCEPT;
^
libcxx/include/typeinfo:344:11: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'std::bad_cast' first required here
throw bad_cast();
^
Fix these by adding an explicitly defaulted copy constructor.
The latter are like:
libcxx/include/codecvt:105:37: warning: dynamic exception specifications are deprecated [-Wdeprecated-dynamic-exception-spec]
virtual int do_encoding() const throw();
^~~~~~~
Fix these by using the _NOEXCEPT macro instead.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, #libc
Reviewed By: EricWF, #libc
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76150
This patch de-duplicates most compressed pair constructors
to use the same code in C++11 and C++03.
Part of doing that is deleting the "__second_tag()" and replacing
it with a "__value_init_tag()" which has the same effect, but
allows for the removal of the special "one-arg" first element
constructor.
This patch is intended to have no semantic change.
All the compilers we support provide these builtins. We don't
need to do a configuration dance anymore.
This patch also cleans up some dead or almost dead
C++11 feature detection macros.
llvm-svn: 364047
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
Nikolas Klauser