This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
`std::function` has been deprecated for a few releases now. Remove it with an option to opt-back-in with a note that this option will be removed in LLVM 16.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, EricWF, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127908
This makes Clang scream at us if there is a class without a key function.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127900
This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e7 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anything outside
of the `std::ranges::` namespace itself. This means we must permit
`ranges::less` etc. in no-ranges mode; that seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120139
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
Basically a rebase of D104980; most of that patch had already happened
via gradual drive-by changes, but this finishes it up.
Don't touch the inclusions from `<__functional_base>`, `<__hash_table>`,
or `<__locale>`; those could be removed if we propagated the
inclusions up to the includers of those files, but there are lots
of those includers.
`<algorithm>`, `<functional>`, and `<memory>` already include `<utility>`
at the top level. `<iterator>` did not, so I've added it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119020
With this patch there should be no more namespaces without closing comment
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118668
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
Remove a bunch of LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG. This is the result of a
rabbithole to re-eliminate the workaround I introduced into
std::cref in D117953. It turns out that Clang's C++03 mode
(the only compiler we care about C++03 for) now supports all
the things we were originally eschewing via LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG;
we can fully support these reference_wrapper features in
C++03 mode, and un-XFAIL the relevant tests.
Drive-by constexprify a few more tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117974
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
Before this patch, the user needed to specialize both of
`is_placeholder<MyType>` and `is_placeholder<const MyType>`.
After this patch, only the former is needed (although the
latter is harmless if provided).
The new tests don't actually fail unless return type deduction
is used, which is a C++14 feature. Specializing `is_placeholder`
is still allowed in C++11, though.
Fixes#51095.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116388
Use `= delete` for member functions that are marked with `// = delete;`
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115291
However, whether applications rely on the std::bad_function_call vtable
being in the dylib is still controlled by the ABI macro, since changing
that would be an ABI break.
Also separate preprocessor definitions for whether to use a key function
and whether to use a `bad_function_call`-specific `what` message
(`what` message is mandated by [LWG2233](http://wg21.link/LWG2233)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
All supported compilers provide support for inline variables in C++17 now.
Also, as a fly-by fix, replace some uses of _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR by just
constexpr.
The only exception in this patch is `std::ignore`, which is provided
prior to C++17. Since it is defined in an anonymous namespace, it always
has internal linkage anyway, so using an inline variable there doesn't
provide any benefit. Instead, `inline` was removed entirely on `std::ignore`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110243
In other places in the code, we use lowercase spelling for things that
are not available in prior standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109435
I just ran into a compiler error involving __bind_back and some overloads
that were being disabled with _EnableIf. I noticed that the error message
was quite bad and did not mention the reason for the overload being
excluded. Specifically, the error looked like this:
candidate template ignored: substitution failure [with _Args =
<ContiguousView>]: no member named '_EnableIfImpl' in 'std::_MetaBase<false>'
Instead, when using enable_if or enable_if_t, the compiler is clever and
can produce better diagnostics, like so:
candidate template ignored: requirement 'is_invocable_v<
std::__bind_back_op<1, std::integer_sequence<unsigned long, 0>>,
std::ranges::views::__transform::__fn &, std::tuple<PlusOne> &,
ContiguousView>' was not satisfied [with _Args = <ContiguousView>]
Basically, it tries to do a poor man's implementation of concepts, which
is already a lot better than simply complaining about substitution failure.
Hence, this commit uses enable_if_t instead of _EnableIf whenever
possible. That is both more straightforward than using the internal
helper, and also leads to better error messages in those cases.
I understand the motivation for _EnableIf's implementation was to improve
compile-time performance, however I believe striving to improve error
messages is even more important for our QOI, hence this patch. Furthermore,
it is unclear that _EnableIf actually improved compile-time performance
in any noticeable way (see discussion in the review for details).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108216
Nikolas Klauser