Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikolas Klauser 84fc2c3cd6 [libc++] Make the naming of private member variables consistent and enforce it through readability-identifier-naming
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: aheejin, sstefan1, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129386
2022-09-02 21:36:36 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser 80c7e93a2a [libc++] Add a bunch of missing _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, huixie90, #libc

Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, miyuki

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129968
2022-08-13 22:41:22 +02:00
Konstantin Varlamov 14cf74d65d [libc++][ranges] Implement `ranges::shuffle`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130321
2022-07-22 09:59:13 -07:00
Konstantin Varlamov a7c3379cf9 [libc++][ranges] Make range algorithms support proxy iterators
Also test all the range algorithms to verify the support.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129823
2022-07-17 18:12:06 -07:00
Louis Dionne f3966eaf86 [libc++] Make the Debug mode a configuration-time only option
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.

This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.

This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.

In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
2022-06-07 16:33:53 -04:00
Louis Dionne 368faacac7 [libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e7 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
2022-03-01 08:20:24 -05:00
Christopher Di Bella 5aaefa510e [libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
2022-02-26 09:00:25 +00:00
Arthur O'Dwyer fa6b9e4010 [libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.
Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800
2022-02-04 12:27:19 -05:00
Danila Kutenin a45d2287ad [libc++] Unspecified behavior randomization in libc++
This effort is dedicated to deflake the tests of the users which depend
on the unspecified behavior of algorithms and containers. This also
might help updating the sorting algorithm in libcxx which has the
quadratic worst case in the future or at least create a new one under
flag.

For detailed design, please see the design doc I provide in the patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96946
2021-11-16 15:55:33 -05:00
Louis Dionne 64184b4af0 [libc++][NFC] Remove useless _LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS
Only files that actually use min/max are required to do this dance.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108778
2021-08-27 12:41:55 -04:00
Christopher Di Bella 6adbc83ee9 [libcxx][modularisation] moves <utility> content out of <type_traits>
Moves:

* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
  `__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
  `__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
2021-06-24 17:57:29 +00:00
Louis Dionne 134723edd5 [libcxx] Move all algorithms into their own headers
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.

This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb8, which was reverted in 692d7166f7
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583

Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:

Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
2021-06-19 07:49:06 -04:00
Petr Hosek 692d7166f7 Revert "[libcxx][gardening] Move all algorithms into their own headers."
This reverts commit 7ed7d4ccb8 as it
uncovered a Clang bug PR50592.
2021-06-07 17:15:20 -07:00
zoecarver 7ed7d4ccb8 [libcxx][gardening] Move all algorithms into their own headers.
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into its own header. This is a NFC.

Note: during this change, I burned down all the includes, so this follows "include only and exactly what you use."

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
2021-06-04 09:37:12 -07:00