Summary:
In this change we move the definition of the log reading routines from
the tools directory in LLVM to {include/llvm,lib}/XRay. We improve the
documentation a little bit for the publicly accessible headers, and
adjust the top-matter. This also leads to some refactoring and cleanup
in the tooling code.
In particular, we do the following:
- Rename the class from LogReader to Trace, as it better represents
the logical set of records as opposed to a log.
- Use file type detection instead of asking the user to say what
format the input file is. This allows us to keep the interface
simple and encapsulate the logic of loading the data appropriately.
In future changes we increase the API surface and write dedicated unit
tests for the XRay library.
Depends on D24376.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mgorny, llvm-commits, varno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28345
llvm-svn: 291652
arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager.
This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to
support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and
to support invalidation of analyses.
An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require
access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are
cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even
with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made
the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the
common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available
to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the
simplicity afforded is worth it.
This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are
the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them.
While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop
passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is
reasonably compact.
I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update
mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches
along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in
more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these
until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292
llvm-svn: 291651
These are interesting again because the user may not be aware that this
is a common reason preventing LICM.
A const is removed from an instruction pointer declaration in order to
pass it to ORE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27940
llvm-svn: 291649
Textual headers and builtins that are #import'd from different
modules should get re-entered when these modules are independent
from each other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26267
rdar://problem/25881934
llvm-svn: 291644
Even with aggressive fusion enabled, this requires duplicating
the fmul, or increases an fadd to another fma which is not an
improvement.
llvm-svn: 291642
This was reverted because it would miscompile code where the cmp had
multiple uses. That was due to a deficiency in the existing code, which
was fixed in r291630 (see the PR for details).
This re-commit includes an extra test for the kind of code that got
miscompiled: @test_sub_1_setcc_jcc.
llvm-svn: 291640
Fix a crash in body farm when synthesizing a getter for a property
synthesized for a property declared in a protocol on a class extension
that shadows a declaration of the property in a category.
In this case, Sema doesn't fill in the implicit 'self' parameter for the getter
in the category, which leads to a crash when trying to synthesize the getter
for it.
To avoid the crash, skip getter synthesis in body farm if the self parameter is
not filled int.
rdar://problem/29938138
llvm-svn: 291635
There is no guaranteed order in which CMake files for individual
runtimes are invoked and therefore we cannot rely on existence of
targets defined in other runtimes. Use the new HAVE_<name> options
instead in those cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28391
llvm-svn: 291632
On Darwin, we currently use 'ignore_interceptors_accesses', which is a heavy-weight solution that simply turns of race detection in all interceptors. This was done to suppress false positives coming from system libraries (non-instrumented code), but it also silences a lot of real races. This patch implements an alternative approach that should allow us to enable interceptors and report races coming from them, but only if they are called directly from instrumented code.
The patch matches the caller PC in each interceptors. For non-instrumented code, we call ThreadIgnoreBegin.
The assumption here is that the number of instrumented modules is low. Most likely there's only one (the instrumented main executable) and all the other modules are system libraries (non-instrumented).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28264
llvm-svn: 291631
We would miscompile the following:
void g(int);
int f(volatile long long *p) {
bool b = __atomic_fetch_add(p, 1, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) < 0;
g(b ? 12 : 34);
return b ? 56 : 78;
}
into
pushq %rax
lock incq (%rdi)
movl $12, %eax
movl $34, %edi
cmovlel %eax, %edi
callq g(int)
testq %rax, %rax <---- Bad.
movl $56, %ecx
movl $78, %eax
cmovsl %ecx, %eax
popq %rcx
retq
because the code failed to take into account that the cmp has multiple
uses, replaced one of them, and left the other one comparing garbage.
llvm-svn: 291630
We were starting to get some name clashes between llvm-pdbdump
and the common CodeView framework, so I took this opportunity
to rename a bunch of files to more accurately describe their
usage. This also helps in llvm-pdbdump to distinguish
between different files and whether they are used for pretty
dump mode or raw dump mode.
llvm-svn: 291627
This creates a centralized class in which to store type records.
It stores types as an array of entries, which matches the
notion of a type stream being a topologically sorted DAG.
Logic to build up such a database was already being used in
CVTypeDumper, so CVTypeDumper is now updated to to read from
a TypeDatabase which is filled out by an earlier visitor in
the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28486
llvm-svn: 291626
handle generic ranges by using std::begin and std::end rather than
requiring things to look exactly like an STL container.
Much of the credit for this goes to Dave Blaikie who helped me figure
out the right incantations.
This will probably be re-designed when I send this to the maintainers of
gmock, so I've instead structured it to change is little as possible
while it is a local patch. That makes it somewhat ugly, but I think a focused
change is better for getting this to work for LLVM today and letting the
upstream maintainers figure out the correct long-term pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28288
llvm-svn: 291623
This patch reverts r291588: [PGO] Turn off comdat renaming in IR PGO by default,
as we are seeing some hash mismatches in our internal tests.
llvm-svn: 291621
Some of the callers are artificially limiting this transform to integer types;
this should make it easier to incrementally remove that restriction.
llvm-svn: 291620
Summary:
This fixes Transforms/LoopUnroll/runtime-loop3.ll which failed with
EXTENSIVE_DEBUG, because the cloned basic blocks were not added to the
correct sub-loops in LoopUnrollRuntime.cpp.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28482
llvm-svn: 291619
Summary:
Previously if you had
* a function with the fast-math-enabled attr, followed by
* a function without the fast-math attr,
the second function would inherit the first function's fast-math-ness.
This means that mixing fast-math and non-fast-math functions in a module
was completely broken unless you explicitly annotated every
non-fast-math function with "unsafe-fp-math"="false". This appears to
have been broken since r176986 (March 2013), when the resetTargetOptions
function was introduced.
This patch tests the correct behavior as best we can. I don't think I
can test FPDenormalMode and NoTrappingFPMath, because they aren't used
in any backends during function lowering. Surprisingly, I also can't
find any uses at all of LessPreciseFPMAD affecting generated code.
The NVPTX/fast-math.ll test changes are an expected result of fixing
this bug. When FMA is disabled, we emit add as "add.rn.f32", which
prevents fma combining. Before this patch, fast-math was enabled in all
functions following the one which explicitly enabled it on itself, so we
were emitting plain "add.f32" where we should have generated
"add.rn.f32".
Reviewers: mkuper
Subscribers: hfinkel, majnemer, jholewinski, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28507
llvm-svn: 291618
The original code considered only v2i64 as slow for this feature. This patch
consider all 128-bit long vector types as slow candidates.
In internal tests, extending this feature to all 128-bit vector types
resulted in an overall improvement of 1% on Exynos M1.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27998
llvm-svn: 291616
Move the code to update LoopInfo for cloned basic blocks to
addClonedBlockToLoopInfo, as suggested in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28482.
llvm-svn: 291614
Summary:
Convention wisdom says that bytes in Function are precious, and the
vast, vast majority of globals do not live in special sections. Even
when they do, they tend to live in the same section. Store the section
name on the LLVMContext in a StringSet, and maintain a map from
GlobalObject* to section name like we do for metadata, prefix data, etc.
The fact that we've survived this long wasting at least three pointers
of space in Function suggests that Function bytes are perhaps not as
precious as we once thought. Given that most functions have metadata
attachments when debug info is enabled, we might consider adding a
pointer here to make that access more efficient.
Reviewers: jlebar, dexonsmith, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28150
llvm-svn: 291613
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27742
llvm-svn: 291609
I have two immediate motivations for adding this:
1) It makes writing expectations in tests *dramatically* easier. A
quick example that is a taste of what is possible:
std::vector<int> v = ...;
EXPECT_THAT(v, UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3));
This checks that v contains '1', '2', and '3' in some order. There
are a wealth of other helpful matchers like this. They tend to be
highly generic and STL-friendly so they will in almost all cases work
out of the box even on custom LLVM data structures.
I actually find the matcher syntax substantially easier to read even
for simple assertions:
EXPECT_THAT(a, Eq(b));
EXPECT_THAT(b, Ne(c));
Both of these make it clear what is being *tested* and what is being
*expected*. With `EXPECT_EQ` this is implicit (the LHS is expected,
the RHS is tested) and often confusing. With `EXPECT_NE` it is just
not clear. Even the failure error messages are superior with the
matcher based expectations.
2) When testing any kind of generic code, you are continually defining
dummy types with interfaces and then trying to check that the
interfaces are manipulated in a particular way. This is actually what
mocks are *good* for -- testing *interface interactions*. With
generic code, there is often no "fake" or other object that can be
used.
For a concrete example of where this is currently causing significant
pain, look at the pass manager unittests which are riddled with
counters incremented when methods are called. All of these could be
replaced with mocks. The result would be more effective at testing
the code by having tighter constraints. It would be substantially
more readable and maintainable when updating the code. And the error
messages on failure would have substantially more information as
mocks automatically record stack traces and other information *when
the API is misused* instead of trying to diagnose it after the fact.
I expect that #1 will be the overwhelming majority of the uses of gmock,
but I think that is sufficient to justify having it. I would actually
like to update the coding standards to encourage the use of matchers
rather than any other form of `EXPECT_...` macros as they are IMO
a strict superset in terms of functionality and readability.
I think that #2 is relatively rarely useful, but there *are* cases where
it is useful. Historically, I think misuse of actual mocking as
described in #2 has led to resistance towards this framework. I am
actually sympathetic to this -- mocking can easily be overused. However
I think this is not a significant concern in LLVM. First and foremost,
LLVM has very careful and rare exposure of abstract interfaces or
dependency injection, which are the most prone to abuse with mocks. So
there are few opportunities to abuse them. Second, a large fraction of
LLVM's unittests are testing *generic code* where mocks actually make
tremendous sense. And gmock is well suited to building interfaces that
exercise generic libraries. Finally, I still think we should be willing
to have testing utilities in tree even if they should be used rarely. We
can use code review to help guide the usage here.
For a longer and more complete discussion of this, see the llvm-dev
thread here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108672.html
The general consensus seems that this is a reasonable direction to start
down, but that doesn't mean we should race ahead and use this
everywhere. I have one test that is blocked on this to land and that was
specifically used as an example. Before widespread adoption, I'm going
to work up some (brief) guidelines as some of these facilities should be
used sparingly and carefully.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28156
llvm-svn: 291606
Chandler Carruth