I just learned that target triples prevent test cases to be run on other
architectures. Polly test cases are until now sufficiently target independent
to not require any target triples. Hence, we drop them.
llvm-svn: 235384
Scops that only read seem generally uninteresting and scops that only write are
most likely initializations where there is also little to optimize. To not
waste compile time we bail early.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7735
llvm-svn: 229820
This allows us to skip ast and code generation if we did not optimize
a SCoP and will not generate parallel or alias annotations. The
initial heuristic to exit is simple but allows improvements later on.
All failing test cases have been modified to disable early exit, thus
to keep their coverage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7254
llvm-svn: 228851
Schedule dimensions that have the same constant value accross all statements do
not carry any information, but due to the increased dimensionality of the
schedule cost compile time. To not pay this cost, we remove constant dimensions
if possible.
llvm-svn: 225067
We introduces a new flag -polly-parallel and use it to annotate the for-nodes in
the isl ast that we want to execute thread parallel (e.g., using OpenMP). We
previously already emmitted openmp annotations, but we did this for various
kinds of parallel loops, including some which we can not run in parallel.
With this patch we now have three annotations:
1) #pragma known-parallel [reduction]
2) #pragma omp for
3) #pragma simd
meaning:
1) loop has no loop carried dependences
2) loop will be executed thread-parallel
3) loop can possibly be vectorized
This patch introduces 1) and reduces the use of 2) to only the cases where we
will actually generate thread parallel code.
It is in preparation of openmp code generation in our isl backend.
Legacy:
- We also have a command line option -enable-polly-openmp. This option controls
the OpenMP code generation in CLooG. It will become an alias of
-polly-parallel after the CLooG code generation has been dropped.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6142
llvm-svn: 221479
When doing SCEV based code generation, we ignore instructions calculating values
that are fully defined by a SCEV expression. The values that are calculated by
this instructions are recalculated on demand.
This commit improves the check to verify if certain instructions can be ignored
and recalculated on demand.
llvm-svn: 177313
Tobias Grosser