to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345281
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
This patch fixes std::allocator, and more specifically, all users
of __libcpp_allocate and __libcpp_deallocate, to support over-aligned
types.
__libcpp_allocate/deallocate now take an alignment parameter, and when
the specified alignment is greater than that supported by malloc/new,
the aligned version of operator new is called (assuming it's available).
When aligned new isn't available, the old behavior has been kept, and the
alignment parameter is ignored.
This patch depends on recent changes to __builtin_operator_new/delete which
allow them to be used to call any regular new/delete operator. By using
__builtin_operator_new/delete when possible, the new/delete erasure optimization
is maintained.
llvm-svn: 328180
Summary:
On Windows the identifier `__deallocate` is defined as a macro by one of the Windows system headers. Previously libc++ worked around this by `#undef __deallocate` and generating a warning. However this causes the WIN32 version of `__threading_support` to always generate a warning on Windows. This is not OK.
This patch renames all usages of `__deallocate` internally as to not conflict with the macro.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, majnemer, rnk, rsmith, smeenai, compnerd
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28426
llvm-svn: 291332
Visual Studio's SAL extension uses a macro named __deallocate. This macro is
used pervasively, and gets included through various different ways. This
conflicts with the similarly named interfaces in libc++. Introduce a undef
header similar to __undef_min_max to handle this. This fixes a number of errors
due to the macro replacing the function name.
llvm-svn: 229162
Chandler Carruth