The architecture has many comparison instructions, including some that
extend one of the operands. The signed comparison instructions use sign
extensions and the unsigned comparison instructions use zero extensions.
In cases where we had a free choice between signed or unsigned comparisons,
we were trying to decide at lowering time which would best fit the available
instructions, taking things like extension type into account. The code
to do that was getting increasingly hairy and was also making some bad
decisions. E.g. when comparing the result of two LLCs, it is better to use
CR rather than CLR, since CR can be fused with a branch while CLR can't.
This patch removes the lowering code and instead adds an operand to
integer comparisons to say whether signed comparison is required,
whether unsigned comparison is required, or whether either is OK.
We can then leave the choice of instruction up to the normal isel code.
llvm-svn: 190138
For now this just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189819
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189469
Lengths up to a certain threshold (currently 6 * 256) use a series of MVCs.
Lengths above that threshold use a loop to handle X*256 bytes followed
by a single MVC to handle the excess (if any). This loop will also be
needed in future when support for variable lengths is added.
Because the same tablegen classes are used to define MVC and CLC,
the patch also has the side-effect of defining a pseudo loop instruction
for CLC. That instruction isn't used yet (and wouldn't be handled correctly
if it were). I'm planning to use it soon though.
llvm-svn: 189331
If we had a store of an integer to memory, and the integer and store size
were suitable for a form of MV..., we used MV... no matter what. We could
then have sequences like:
lay %r2, 0(%r3,%r4)
mvi 0(%r2), 4
In these cases it seems better to force the constant into a register
and use a normal store:
lhi %r2, 4
stc %r2, 0(%r3, %r4)
since %r2 is more likely to be hoisted and is easier to rematerialize.
llvm-svn: 189098
...so that it can be used for z too. Most of the code is the same.
The only real change is to use TargetTransformInfo to test when a sqrt
instruction is available.
The pass is opt-in because at the moment it only handles sqrt.
llvm-svn: 189097
The initial port used MLG(R) for i64 UMUL_LOHI but left the other three
combinations as not-legal-or-custom. Although 32x32->{32,32}
multiplications exist, they're not as quick as doing a normal 64-bit
multiplication, so it didn't seem like i32 SMUL_LOHI and UMUL_LOHI
would be useful. There's also no direct instruction for i64 SMUL_LOHI,
so it needs to be implemented in terms of UMUL_LOHI.
However, not defining these patterns means that we don't convert
division by a constant into multiplication, so this patch fills
in the other cases. The new i64 SMUL_LOHI sequence is simpler
than the one that we used previously for 64x64->128 multiplication,
so int-mul-08.ll now tests the full sequence.
llvm-svn: 188898
SystemZTargetLowering::emitStringWrapper() previously loaded the character
into R0 before the loop and made R0 live on entry. I'd forgotten that
allocatable registers weren't allowed to be live across blocks at this stage,
and it confused LiveVariables enough to cause a miscompilation of f3 in
memchr-02.ll.
This patch instead loads R0 in the loop and leaves LICM to hoist it
after RA. This is actually what I'd tried originally, but I went for
the manual optimisation after noticing that R0 often wasn't being hoisted.
This bug forced me to go back and look at why, now fixed as r188774.
We should also try to optimize null checks so that they test the CC result
of the SRST directly. The select between null and the SRST GPR result could
then usually be deleted as dead.
llvm-svn: 188779
Post-RA LICM keeps three sets of registers: PhysRegDefs, PhysRegClobbers
and TermRegs. When it sees a definition of R it adds all aliases of R
to the corresponding set, so that when it needs to test for membership
it only needs to test a single register, rather than worrying about
aliases there too. E.g. the final candidate loop just has:
unsigned Def = Candidates[i].Def;
if (!PhysRegClobbers.test(Def) && ...) {
to test whether register Def is multiply defined.
However, there was also a shortcut in ProcessMI to make sure we didn't
add candidates if we already knew that they would fail the final test.
This shortcut was more pessimistic than the final one because it
checked whether _any alias_ of the defined register was multiply defined.
This is too conservative for targets that define register pairs.
E.g. on z, R0 and R1 are sometimes used as a pair, so there is a
128-bit register that aliases both R0 and R1. If a loop used
R0 and R1 independently, and the definition of R0 came first,
we would be able to hoist the R0 assignment (because that used
the final test quoted above) but not the R1 assignment (because
that meant we had two definitions of the paired R0/R1 register
and would fail the shortcut in ProcessMI).
This patch just uses the same check for the ProcessMI shortcut as
we use in the final candidate loop.
llvm-svn: 188774
For now this matches the equivalent of (neg (abs ...)), which did hit a few
times in projects/test-suite. We should probably also match cases where
absolute-like selects are used with reversed arguments.
llvm-svn: 188671
This first cut is pretty conservative. The final argument register (R6)
is call-saved, so we would need to make sure that the R6 argument to a
sibling call is the same as the R6 argument to the calling function,
which seems worth keeping as a separate patch.
Saying that integer truncations are free means that we no longer
use the extending instructions LGF and LLGF for spills in int-conv-09.ll
and int-conv-10.ll. Instead we treat the registers as 64 bits wide and
truncate them to 32-bits where necessary. I think it's unlikely we'd
use LGF and LLGF for spills in other situations for the same reason,
so I'm removing the tests rather than replacing them. The associated
code is generic and applies to many more instructions than just
LGF and LLGF, so there is no corresponding code removal.
llvm-svn: 188669
Generalize r188163 to cope with return types other than MVT::i32, just
as the existing visitMemCmpCall code did. I've split this out into a
subroutine so that it can be used for other upcoming patches.
I also noticed that I'd used the wrong API to record the out chain.
It's a load that uses DAG.getRoot() rather than getRoot(), so the out
chain should go on PendingLoads. I don't have a testcase for that because
we don't do any interesting scheduling on z yet.
llvm-svn: 188540
r188163 used CLC to implement memcmp. Code that compares the result
directly against zero can test the CC value produced by CLC, but code
that needs an integer result must use IPM. The sequence I'd used was:
ipm <reg>
sll <reg>, 2
sra <reg>, 30
but I'd forgotten that this inverts the order, so that CC==1 ("less")
becomes an integer greater than zero, and CC==2 ("greater") becomes
an integer less than zero. This sequence should only be used if the
CLC arguments are reversed to compensate. The problem then is that
the branch condition must also be reversed when testing the CLC
result directly.
Rather than do that, I went for a different sequence that works with
the natural CLC order:
ipm <reg>
srl <reg>, 28
rll <reg>, <reg>, 31
One advantage of this is that it doesn't clobber CC. A disadvantage
is that any sign extension to 64 bits must be done separately,
rather than being folded into the shifts.
llvm-svn: 188538
- Instead of setting the suffixes in a bunch of places, just set one master
list in the top-level config. We now only modify the suffix list in a few
suites that have one particular unique suffix (.ml, .mc, .yaml, .td, .py).
- Aside from removing the need for a bunch of lit.local.cfg files, this enables
4 tests that were inadvertently being skipped (one in
Transforms/BranchFolding, a .s file each in DebugInfo/AArch64 and
CodeGen/PowerPC, and one in CodeGen/SI which is now failing and has been
XFAILED).
- This commit also fixes a bunch of config files to use config.root instead of
older copy-pasted code.
llvm-svn: 188513
This follows the same lines as the integer code. In the end it seemed
easier to have a second 4-bit mask in TSFlags to specify the compare-like
CC values. That eats one more TSFlags bit than adding a CCHasUnordered
would have done, but it feels more concise.
llvm-svn: 187883
This patch just uses a peephole test for "add; compare; branch" sequences
within a single block. The IR optimizers already convert loops to
decrement-and-branch-on-nonzero form in some cases, so even this
simplistic test triggers many times during a clang bootstrap and
projects/test-suite run. It looks like there are still cases where we
need to more strongly prefer branches on nonzero though. E.g. I saw a
case where a loop that started out with a check for 0 ended up with a
check for -1. I'll try to look at that sometime.
I ended up adding the Reference class because MachineInstr::readsRegister()
doesn't check for subregisters (by design, as far as I could tell).
llvm-svn: 187723
This also fixes a bug in the predication of LR to LOCR: I'd forgotten
that with these in-place instruction builds, the implicit operands need
to be added manually. I think this was latent until now, but is tested
by int-cmp-45.c. It also adds a CC valid mask to STOC, again tested by
int-cmp-45.c.
llvm-svn: 187573
Convert >= 1 to > 0, etc. Using comparison with zero isn't a win on its own,
but it exposes more opportunities for CC reuse (the next patch).
llvm-svn: 187571
The loop optimizers were assuming that scales > 1 were OK. I think this
is actually a bug in TargetLoweringBase::isLegalAddressingMode(),
since it seems to be trying to reject anything that isn't r+i or r+r,
but it has no default case for scales other than 0, 1 or 2. Implementing
the hook for z means that z can no longer test any change there though.
llvm-svn: 187497
Extend r187495 to conditional loads. I split this out because the
easiest way seemed to be to force a particular operand order in
SystemZISelDAGToDAG.cpp.
llvm-svn: 187496
System z branches have a mask to select which of the 4 CC values should
cause the branch to be taken. We can invert a branch by inverting the mask.
However, not all instructions can produce all 4 CC values, so inverting
the branch like this can lead to some oddities. For example, integer
comparisons only produce a CC of 0 (equal), 1 (less) or 2 (greater).
If an integer EQ is reversed to NE before instruction selection,
the branch will test for 1 or 2. If instead the branch is reversed
after instruction selection (by inverting the mask), it will test for
1, 2 or 3. Both are correct, but the second isn't really canonical.
This patch therefore keeps track of which CC values are possible
and uses this when inverting a mask.
Although this is mostly cosmestic, it fixes undefined behavior
for the CIJNLH in branch-08.ll. Another fix would have been
to mask out bit 0 when generating the fused compare and branch,
but the point of this patch is that we shouldn't need to do that
in the first place.
The patch also makes it easier to reuse CC results from other instructions.
llvm-svn: 187495
r187116 moved compare-and-branch generation from the instruction-selection
pass to the peephole optimizer (via optimizeCompare). It turns out that even
this is a bit too early. Fused compare-and-branch instructions don't
interact well with predication, where a CC result is needed. They also
make it harder to reuse the CC side-effects of earlier instructions
(not yet implemented, but the subject of a later patch).
Another problem was that the AnalyzeBranch family of routines weren't
handling compares and branches, so we weren't able to reverse the fused
form in cases where we would reverse a separate branch. This could have
been fixed by extending AnalyzeBranch, but given the other problems,
I've instead moved the fusing to the long-branch pass, which is also
responsible for the opposite transformation: splitting out-of-range
compares and branches into separate compares and long branches.
I've added a test for the AnalyzeBranch problem. A test for the
predication problem is included in the next patch, which fixes a bug
in the choice of CC mask.
llvm-svn: 187494
r186399 aggressively used the RISBG instruction for immediate ANDs,
both because it can handle some values that AND IMMEDIATE can't,
and because it allows the destination register to be different from
the source. I realized later while implementing the distinct-ops
support that it would be better to leave the choice up to
convertToThreeAddress() instead. The AND IMMEDIATE form is shorter
and is less likely to be cracked.
This is a problem for 32-bit ANDs because we assume that all 32-bit
operations will leave the high word untouched, whereas RISBG used in
this way will either clear the high word or copy it from the source
register. The patch uses the z196 instruction RISBLG for this instead.
This means that z10 will be restricted to NILL, NILH and NILF for
32-bit ANDs, but I think that should be OK for now. Although we're
using z10 as the base architecture, the optimization work is going
to be focused more on z196 and zEC12.
llvm-svn: 187492
Before the patch we took advantage of the fact that the compare and
branch are glued together in the selection DAG and fused them together
(where possible) while emitting them. This seemed to work well in practice.
However, fusing the compare so early makes it harder to remove redundant
compares in cases where CC already has a suitable value. This patch
therefore uses the peephole analyzeCompare/optimizeCompareInstr pair of
functions instead.
No behavioral change intended, but it paves the way for a later patch.
llvm-svn: 187116
These instructions are allowed to trap even if the condition is false,
so for now they are only used for "*ptr = (cond ? x : *ptr)"-style
constructs.
llvm-svn: 187111
The atomic tests assume the two-operand forms, so I've restricted them to z10.
Running and-01.ll, or-01.ll and xor-01.ll for z196 as well as z10 shows why
using convertToThreeAddress() is better than exposing the three-operand forms
first and then converting back to two operands where possible (which is what
I'd originally tried). Using the three-operand form first stops us from
taking advantage of NG, OG and XG for spills.
llvm-svn: 186683
The original code only folded SRA into ROTATE ... SELECTED BITS
if there was no outer shift. This patch splits out that check
and generalises it slightly. The extra cases aren't really that
interesting, but this is paving the way for RNSBG support.
llvm-svn: 186571
Richard Sandiford