This patch adds i128 division support by instruction LLVM to lower
128-bit divisions to the __udivmodti4 and __divmodti4 rtlib functions.
This also adds test for 64-bit division and 128-bit division.
Patch by Peter Nimmervoll.
llvm-svn: 327814
The parseFunctionArgs() method was directly reading the
arguments from a Function object, but is should have used the
arguments supplied by the SelectionDAGBuilder.
This was causing
the lowering code to only lower one argument, not two in some cases.
Thanks to @brainlag on GitHub for coming up with the working fix!
Patch-by: @brainlag on GitHub
llvm-svn: 325474
Summary:
This relaxes an assertion inside SelectionDAGBuilder which is overly
restrictive on targets which have no concept of alignment (such as AVR).
In these architectures, all types are aligned to 8-bits.
After this, LLVM will only assert that accesses are aligned on targets
which actually require alignment.
This patch follows from a discussion on llvm-dev a few months ago
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Unaligned-atomic-load-store-td112815.html
Reviewers: bogner, nemanjai, joerg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, cactus, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39946
llvm-svn: 320243
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
r298178 capitalized the fields in `ArgListEntry`. All the official
targets were updated accordingly, but as an experimental target AVR
was missed.
llvm-svn: 298677
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
It is sufficient to skip emission of these arguments as we have nothing
to actually pass through the function call.
The AVR-GCC reference has nothing to say about zero-sized arguments,
presumably because C/C++ doesn't support them. This means we don't have
to worry about ABI differences.
llvm-svn: 294119
Dylan McKay