Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kirstóf Umann 5192783bb2 [analyzer][RetainCount] Tie diagnostics to osx.cocoa.RetainCount rather then RetainCountBase, for the most part
Similarly to other patches of mine, I'm trying to uniformize the checker
interface so that dependency checkers don't emit diagnostics. The checker that
made me most anxious so far was definitely RetainCount, because it is definitely
impacted by backward compatibility concerns, and implements a checker hierarchy
that is a lot different to other examples of similar size. Also, I don't have
authority, nor expertise regarding ObjC related code, so I welcome any
objection/discussion!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78099
2020-05-27 00:01:47 +02:00
Kirstóf Umann 6f5431846b [analyzer][RetainCount] Remove the CheckOSObject option
As per http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063215.html, lets get rid of this option.

It presents 2 issues that have bugged me for years now:

* OSObject is NOT a boolean option. It in fact has 3 states:
  * osx.OSObjectRetainCount is enabled but OSObject it set to false: RetainCount
    regards the option as disabled.
  * sx.OSObjectRetainCount is enabled and OSObject it set to true: RetainCount
    regards the option as enabled.
  * osx.OSObjectRetainCount is disabled: RetainCount regards the option as
    disabled.
* The hack involves directly modifying AnalyzerOptions::ConfigTable, which
  shouldn't even be public in the first place.

This still isn't really ideal, because it would be better to preserve the option
and remove the checker (we want visible checkers to be associated with
diagnostics, and hidden options like this one to be associated with changing how
the modeling is done), but backwards compatibility is an issue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78097
2020-05-26 13:22:58 +02:00
Artem Dergachev b0914e7276 [analyzer] Specify the C++ standard in more tests.
Makes life easier for downstream developers with different default standard.

llvm-svn: 375308
2019-10-19 00:08:17 +00:00
Kristof Umann 8fd74ebfc0 [analyzer] Reimplement dependencies between checkers
Unfortunately, up until now, the fact that certain checkers depended on one
another was known, but how these actually unfolded was hidden deep within the
implementation. For example, many checkers (like RetainCount, Malloc or CString)
modelled a certain functionality, and exposed certain reportable bug types to
the user. For example, while MallocChecker models many many different types of
memory handling, the actual "unix.MallocChecker" checker the user was exposed to
was merely and option to this modeling part.

Other than this being an ugly mess, this issue made resolving the checker naming
issue almost impossible. (The checker naming issue being that if a checker
registered more than one checker within its registry function, both checker
object recieved the same name) Also, if the user explicitly disabled a checker
that was a dependency of another that _was_ explicitly enabled, it implicitly,
without "telling" the user, reenabled it.

Clearly, changing this to a well structured, declarative form, where the
handling of dependencies are done on a higher level is very much preferred.

This patch, among the detailed things later, makes checkers declare their
dependencies within the TableGen file Checkers.td, and exposes the same
functionality to plugins and statically linked non-generated checkers through
CheckerRegistry::addDependency. CheckerRegistry now resolves these dependencies,
makes sure that checkers are added to CheckerManager in the correct order,
and makes sure that if a dependency is disabled, so will be every checker that
depends on it.

In detail:

* Add a new field to the Checker class in CheckerBase.td called Dependencies,
which is a list of Checkers.
* Move unix checkers before cplusplus, as there is no forward declaration in
tblgen :/
* Add the following new checkers:
  - StackAddrEscapeBase
  - StackAddrEscapeBase
  - CStringModeling
  - DynamicMemoryModeling (base of the MallocChecker family)
  - IteratorModeling (base of the IteratorChecker family)
  - ValistBase
  - SecuritySyntaxChecker (base of bcmp, bcopy, etc...)
  - NSOrCFErrorDerefChecker (base of NSErrorChecker and  CFErrorChecker)
  - IvarInvalidationModeling (base of IvarInvalidation checker family)
  - RetainCountBase (base of RetainCount and OSObjectRetainCount)
* Clear up and registry functions in MallocChecker, happily remove old FIXMEs.
* Add a new addDependency function to CheckerRegistry.
* Neatly format RUN lines in files I looked at while debugging.

Big thanks to Artem Degrachev for all the guidance through this project!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54438

llvm-svn: 352287
2019-01-26 20:06:54 +00:00
George Karpenkov 2c2d0b6e97 Revert "Fix failing MSan bots"
This reverts commit 2cedaaef383d8d6142046074ffebc2bb5a914778.

Revert with a fix.

llvm-svn: 351575
2019-01-18 19:24:55 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich d5dd6a5fdd Fix failing MSan bots
Revert r351508-351514, this block of changes introduced a consistent
MSan failure on the sanitizer bots.

llvm-svn: 351528
2019-01-18 08:43:22 +00:00
George Karpenkov a0425f3a2f [analyzer] [RetainCountChecker] Smart pointer support.
rdar://47323216

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56817

llvm-svn: 351508
2019-01-18 03:12:35 +00:00
George Karpenkov d1081ec508 [analyzer] Hack for backwards compatibility for options for RetainCountChecker.
To be removed once the clients update.

llvm-svn: 348821
2018-12-11 01:13:58 +00:00
George Karpenkov 27db33075c [analyzer] Move out tracking retain count for OSObjects into a separate checker
Allow enabling and disabling tracking of ObjC/CF objects
separately from tracking of OS objects.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55400

llvm-svn: 348638
2018-12-07 20:21:51 +00:00