MVE does not have a simple sign extend instruction that can move elements
across lanes. We currently often end up moving each lane into and out of a GPR,
in order to get elements into the correct places. When we have a store of a
trunc (or a extend of a load), we can instead just split the store/load in two,
using the narrowing/widening load/store instructions from each half of the
vector.
This does that for stores. It happens very early in a store combine, so as to
easily detect the truncates. (It would be possible to do this later, but that
would involve looking through a buildvector of extract elements. Not impossible
but this way seemed simpler).
By enabling store combines we also get a vmovdrr combine for free, helping some
other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67828
llvm-svn: 372717
If you compile with `-mattr=+mve` (enabling integer MVE instructions
but not floating-point ones), then the scalar FP //registers// exist
and it's legal to move things in and out of them, load and store them,
but it's not legal to do arithmetic on them.
In D60708, the calls to `addRegisterClass` in ARMISelLowering that
enable use of the scalar FP registers became conditionalised on
`Subtarget->hasFPRegs()` instead of `Subtarget->hasVFP2Base()`, so
that loads, stores and moves of those registers would work. But I
didn't realise that that would also enable all the operations on those
types by default.
Now, if the target doesn't have basic VFP, we follow up those
`addRegisterClass` calls by turning back off all the nontrivial
operations you can perform on f32 and f64. That causes several
knock-on failures, which are fixed by allowing the `VMOVDcc` and
`VMOVScc` instructions to be selected even if all you have is
`HasFPRegs`, and adjusting several checks for 'is this a double in a
single-precision-only world?' to the more general 'is this any FP type
we can't do arithmetic on?'. Between those, the whole of the
`float-ops.ll` and `fp16-instructions.ll` tests can now run in
MVE-without-FP mode and generate correct-looking code.
One odd side effect is that I had to relax the check lines in that
test so that they permit test functions like `add_f` to be generated
as tailcalls to software FP library functions, instead of ordinary
calls. Doing that is entirely legal, but the mystery is why this is
the first RUN line that's needed the relaxation: on the usual kind of
non-FP target, no tailcalls ever seem to be generated. Going by the
llc messages, I think `SoftenFloatResult` must be perturbing the code
generation in some way, but that's as much as I can guess.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63938
llvm-svn: 364909
This is essentially a recommit of r285893, but with a correctness fix. The
problem of the original commit was that this:
bic r5, r7, #31
cbz r5, .LBB2_10
got rewritten into:
lsrs r5, r7, #5
beq .LBB2_10
The result in destination register r5 is not the same and this is incorrect
when r5 is not dead. So this fix includes checking the uses of the AND
destination register. And also, compared to the original commit, some regression
tests didn't need changing anymore because of this extra check.
For completeness, this was the original commit message:
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more
efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of
set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and
set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and
set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit
into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to
MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and
branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower
zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two
16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a
complex immediate, so is also a win.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27761
llvm-svn: 289794
This recommits r281323, which was backed out for two reasons. One, a selfhost failure, and two, it apparently caused Chromium failures. Actually, the latter was a red herring. The log has expired from the former, but I suspect that was a red herring too (actually caused by another problematic patch of mine). Therefore reapplying, and will watch the bots like a hawk.
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
llvm-svn: 285893
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
llvm-svn: 281323
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
llvm-svn: 281215
All of the builtins are designed to be invoked with ARM AAPCS CC even on ARM
AAPCS VFP CC hosts. Tweak the default initialisation to ARM AAPCS CC rather
than C CC for ARM/thumb targets.
The changes to the tests are necessary to ensure that the calling convention for
the lowered library calls are honoured. Furthermore, these adjustments cause
certain branch invocations to change to branch-and-link since the returned value
needs to be moved across registers (d0 -> r0, r1).
llvm-svn: 280683
The existing code would unnecessarily break LDRD/STRD apart with
non-adjacent registers, on thumb2 this is not necessary.
Ideally on thumb2 we shouldn't match for ldrd/strd pre-regalloc anymore
as there is not reason to set register hints anymore, changing that is
something for a future patch however.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9694
Recommiting after the revert in r238821, the buildbot still failed with
the patch removed so there seems to be another reason for the breakage.
llvm-svn: 238935
This reverts commit r238795, as it broke the Thumb2 self-hosting buildbot.
Since self-hosting issues with Clang are hard to investigate, I'm taking the
liberty to revert now, so we can investigate it offline.
llvm-svn: 238821
The existing code would unnecessarily break LDRD/STRD apart with
non-adjacent registers, on thumb2 this is not necessary.
Ideally on thumb2 we shouldn't match for ldrd/strd pre-regalloc anymore
as there is not reason to set register hints anymore, changing that is
something for a future patch however.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9694
llvm-svn: 238795
The register set for LDMIA begins at offset 3, not 4. We were previously
missing the short encoding of this instruction in the case where the base
register was the first register in the register set.
Also clean up some dead code:
- The isARMLowRegister check is redundant with what VerifyLowRegs does;
replace with an assert.
- Remove handling of LDMDB instruction, which has no short encoding (and
does not appear in ReduceTable).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9485
llvm-svn: 236535
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
The Cortex-M7 has 3 options for its FPU: none, FPv5-SP-D16 and
FPv5-DP-D16. FPv5 has the same instructions as FP-ARMv8, so it can be
modelled using the same target feature, and all double-precision
operations are already disabled by the fp-only-sp target features.
llvm-svn: 218747
The FPv4-SP floating-point unit is generally referred to as
single-precision only, but it does have double-precision registers and
load, store and GPR<->DPR move instructions which operate on them.
This patch enables the use of these registers, the main advantage of
which is that we now comply with the AAPCS-VFP calling convention.
This partially reverts r209650, which added some AAPCS-VFP support,
but did not handle return values or alignment of double arguments in
registers.
This patch also adds tests for Thumb2 code generation for
floating-point instructions and intrinsics, which previously only
existed for ARM.
llvm-svn: 216172
David Green