... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse, and therefore printed in the wrong order by
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effects, especially for
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attribute's order was changed instead.
It also causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be textually
after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes are
merged, but are incompatible. Interchanging the role of the the main
and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where two different
declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple attributes of the
same declaration) are merged to be reversed. There is no easy fix
because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway, which often is on the same line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 335084
Summary:
This is similar to other loop pragmas like 'vectorize'. Currently it
only has state values: distribute(enable) and distribute(disable). When
one of these is specified the corresponding loop metadata is generated:
!{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable", i1 true/false}
As a result, loop distribution will be attempted on the loop even if
Loop Distribution in not enabled globally. Analogously, with 'disable'
distribution can be turned off for an individual loop even when the pass
is otherwise enabled.
There are some slight differences compared to the existing loop pragmas.
1. There is no 'assume_safety' variant which makes its handling slightly
different from 'vectorize'/'interleave'.
2. Unlike the existing loop pragmas, it does not have a corresponding
numeric pragma like 'vectorize' -> 'vectorize_width'. So for the
consistency checks in CheckForIncompatibleAttributes we don't need to
check it against other pragmas. We just need to check for duplicates of
the same pragma.
Reviewers: rsmith, dexonsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: bob.wilson, cfe-commits, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19403
llvm-svn: 272656
This change adds the new unroll metadata "llvm.loop.unroll.enable" which directs
the optimizer to unroll a loop fully if the trip count is known at compile time, and
unroll partially if the trip count is not known at compile time. This differs from
"llvm.loop.unroll.full" which explicitly does not unroll a loop if the trip count is not
known at compile time
With this change "#pragma unroll" generates "llvm.loop.unroll.enable" rather than
"llvm.loop.unroll.full" metadata. This changes the semantics of "#pragma unroll" slightly
to mean "unroll aggressively (fully or partially)" rather than "unroll fully or not at all".
The motivating example for this change was some internal code with a loop marked
with "#pragma unroll" which only sometimes had a compile-time trip count depending
on template magic. When the trip count was a compile-time constant, everything works
as expected and the loop is fully unrolled. However, when the trip count was not a
compile-time constant the "#pragma unroll" explicitly disabled unrolling of the loop(!).
Removing "#pragma unroll" caused the loop to be unrolled partially which was desirable
from a performance perspective.
llvm-svn: 244467
Specifying #pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety) on a loop adds the
mem.parallel_loop_access metadata to each load/store operation in the loop. This
metadata tells loop access analysis (LAA) to skip memory dependency checking.
llvm-svn: 239572
When pragma clang loop unroll() is specified without an argument the diagnostic message should inform that user that 'full' and 'disable' are valid arguments (not 'enable').
llvm-svn: 239363
Previously loop hints such as #pragma loop vectorize_width(#) required a constant. This patch allows a constant expression to be used as well. Such as a non-type template parameter or an expression (2 * c + 1).
Reviewed by Richard Smith
llvm-svn: 219589
This patch is necessary to support constant expressions which replaces the integer value in the loop hint attribute with an expression. The integer value was also storing the pragma’s state for options like vectorize(enable/disable) and the pragma unroll and nounroll directive. The state variable is introduced to hold the state of those options/pragmas. This moves the validation of the state (keywords) from SemaStmtAttr handler to the loop hint annotation token handler.
Resubmit with changes to try to fix the build-bot issue.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman
llvm-svn: 214432
This patch is necessary to support constant expressions which replaces the integer value in the loop hint attribute with an expression. The integer value was also storing the pragma’s state for options like vectorize(enable/disable) and the pragma unroll and nounroll directive. The state variable is introduced to hold the state of those options/pragmas. This moves the validation of the state (keywords) from SemaStmtAttr handler to the loop hint annotation token handler.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman
llvm-svn: 214333
This patch fixes a crash when handling malformed arguments to loop pragmas such
as: "#pragma clang loop vectorize(()". Essentially any argument which is not an
identifier or constant resulted in a crash. This patch also changes a couple of
the error messages which weren't quite correct. New behavior with this patch vs
old behavior:
#pragma clang loop vectorize(1)
OLD: error: missing keyword; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
NEW: error: invalid argument; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
#pragma clang loop vectorize()
OLD: error: expected ')'
NEW: error: missing argument to loop pragma 'vectorize'
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(bad)
OLD: error: missing value; expected a positive integer value
NEW: error: invalid argument; expected a positive integer value
#pragma clang loop vectorize(bad)
OLD: invalid keyword 'bad'; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
NEW: error: invalid argument; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4197
Patch by Mark Heffernan
llvm-svn: 211292
Michael Kruse