This appears to be a real bug caught by -Wunused-value. std::find_if
doesn't modify the underlying collection, it just returns an iterator
pointing to the matching element.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74010
My refactor caused some changes in error reporting that TestAddDsymCommand.py
was checking, so this restores some of the changes to preserve the old
behavior and to un-xfail the affected test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74001
Pretty printing the return value, although a good idea in theory, turned
out to be more confusing than anything else because they require
printing the log statement after the arguments and resulting value have
been serialized.
This changes the logging to behave more like how deserialization is
traced, although a bit more verbose because some of the serializers are
are calling each other.
Summary:
lldb-forward.h is convenient in many ways, but having clang-based
class forward declarations in there makes it easy to proliferate uses of clang
outside of plugins. Removing them makes you much more conscious of when
you're using something from clang and marks where we're using things
from clang in non-plugins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73935
Unless trivially copyable, SB classes that are passed by value should be
treated as const references by the reproducer infrastructure and their
address should be serialized. This is already the case on the
serialization side, but not on the deserialization side. This fixes that
by removing the NotImplementedTag.
Currently SBFile isn't really instrumented, which was causing trouble
when capturing and replaying the Python test suite. The class is
particularly tricky because one of its constructors takes a FileSP which
isn't instrumented. Until we have proper shadowing in place, we'll
simply always record a nullptr.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73992
In order to synthesize tail call frames, the stack frame list must not
be empty (otherwise, there is no "previous" frame to infer a tail call
from).
This case is hard to hit. To trigger it, we must first fail to push
`unwind_frame_sp` because we either fail to get its SymbolContext, or
given its SymbolContext the GetParentOfInlineScope call fails. This
causes m_concrete_frames_fetched to be incremented while m_frames
remains empty. Then, the next frame in the stack may fail within
SynthesizeTailCallFrames. This crash arose during a kernel debugging
session.
rdar://59147051
On Fedora 30 x86_64 with
cmake ../llvm-monorepo/llvm/ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=gold -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="lldb;clang;lld" -DLLVM_USE_SPLIT_DWARF=ON -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON
It does not affect Release builds.
getting:
lldb/source/Expression/IRInterpreter.cpp:1471: error: undefined reference to 'lldb_private::ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI::ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI(lldb_private::Thread&, lldb_private::Address const&, llvm::Type&, llvm::Type&, llvm::ArrayRef<lldb_private::ABI::CallArgument>, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&)'
lldb/source/Expression/LLVMUserExpression.cpp:148: error: undefined reference to 'lldb_private::ThreadPlanCallUserExpression::ThreadPlanCallUserExpression(lldb_private::Thread&, lldb_private::Address&, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned long>, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::UserExpression>&)'
Pavel Labath has suggest LINK_INTERFACE_MULTIPLICITY could be further
increased.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73847
Scale segment identifier up to user_id_t before negating it. This fixes
the identifers being wrongly e.g. 0x00000000fffffffe instead of
0xfffffffffffffffe. Fix suggested by Pavel Labath.
This fixes 5 tests failing on i386 (PR #44748):
lldb-shell :: ObjectFile/ELF/PT_LOAD-overlap-PT_INTERP.yaml
lldb-shell :: ObjectFile/ELF/PT_LOAD-overlap-PT_TLS.yaml
lldb-shell :: ObjectFile/ELF/PT_LOAD-overlap-section.yaml
lldb-shell :: ObjectFile/ELF/PT_LOAD.yaml
lldb-shell :: ObjectFile/ELF/PT_TLS-overlap-PT_LOAD.yaml
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73914
Re-landing this now that (hopefully) all the failures this caused on the
bots have been addressed.
This patch changes the behavior of the substrs argument to self.expect.
Currently, the elements of substrs are unordered and as long as the
string appears in the output, the assertion passes.
We can be more precise by requiring that the substrings be ordered in
the way they appear. My hope is that this will make it harder to
accidentally pass a check because a string appears out of order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766
DataExtractor::GetMaxS64Bitfield performs a shift with UB in order to
construct a bitmask when bitfield_bit_size is 64. The current
implementation actually does “work” in this case, because the assumption
that the shift result is 0 holds, and 0 minus 1 gives the all-ones value
(the correct mask). However, the more readable/maintainable approach
might be to use an off-the-shelf UB-free helper.
Fixes a UBSan issue:
"col" : 37,
"description" : "invalid-shift-exponent",
"filename" : "/Users/vsk/src/llvm-project-master/lldb/source/Utility/DataExtractor.cpp",
"instrumentation_class" : "UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer",
"line" : 615,
"memory_address" : 0,
"summary" : "Shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long long')",
rdar://59117758
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73913
* [NFC] Renamed local `matching_module_list` to `matching_modules` for
conciseness.
* [NFC] Eliminated redundant local variable `num_matches` to reduce the risk
that changes get it out of sync with `matching_modules.GetSize()`.
* Used an early return from case where the symbol file specified matches
multiple modules. This is a slight behavior change, but it's an improvement:
It didn't make sense to tell the user that the symbol file simultaneously
matched multiple modules and no modules.
* [NFC] Used an early return from the case where no matches are found, to
better align with LLVM coding style.
* [NFC] Simplified call of `AppendWarningWithFormat("%s", stuff)` to
`AppendWarning(stuff)`. I don't think this adds any copies. It does
construct a StringRef, but it was going to have to scan the string for the
length anyway.
* [NFC] Removed unnecessary comments and reworded others for clarity.
* Used an early return if the symbol file could not be loaded. This is a
behavior change because previously it could fail silently.
* Used an early return if the object file could not be retrieved from the
symbol file. Again, this is a change because now there's an error message.
* [NFC] Eliminated a namespace alias that wasn't particularly helpful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73594
I previously removed the code in ValueObject::GetExpressionPath that
took advantage of the parameter `qualify_cxx_base_classes`. As a result,
this is now unused and can be removed.
Summary:
I think that there are very few things from clang that actually need forward
declaration, so not having a ClangForward header makes sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73827
Summary:
ClusterManager is using a SmallPtrSet to store the objects in it. We always only add every object once so using a set is not necessary.
Furthermore having a set means that iterating over it is nondeterministic (at least with more than 16 objects in it), so the order in
which the destructors for the managed objects are called is currently also non-deterministic.
This just replaces the SmallPtrSet with a SmallVector.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgrang, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73871
This fixes building for mingw with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS. In static builds,
the psapi dependency gets linked in transitively from Support, but
when linking Support dynamically, it's revealed that these components
also need linking against psapi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73839
Summary:
We currently do far more malloc calls than necessary in the ConstString BumpPtrAllocator. This is due to the 256 BumpPtrAllocators
our ConstString implementation uses internally which end up all just receiving a small share of the total allocated memory
and therefore keep allocating memory in small chunks for far too long. This patch fixes this by increasing the rate at which we increase the
memory chunk size so that our collection of BumpPtrAllocators behaves in total similar to a single BumpPtrAllocator.
Reviewers: llunak
Reviewed By: llunak
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71699
LanguageRuntime::GetOverrideExprOptions is specific to clang and was
only overridden in RenderScriptRuntime. LanguageRuntime in shouldn't
have any knowledge of clang, so remove it from LanguageRuntime and leave
it only in RenderScriptRuntime.
Value::GetValueByteSize() reports the size of a Value as the size of its
underlying CompilerType. However, a host buffer that backs a Value may
be smaller than GetValueByteSize().
This situation arises when the host is only able to partially evaluate a
Value, e.g. because the expression contains DW_OP_piece.
The cleanest fix I've found to this problem is Greg's suggestion, which
is to resize the Value if (after evaluating an expression) it's found to
be too small. I've tried several alternatives which all (in one way or
the other) tried to teach the Value/ValueObjectChild system not to read
past the end of a host buffer, but this was flaky and impractical as it
isn't easy to figure out the host buffer's size (Value::GetScalar() can
point to somewhere /inside/ a host buffer, but you need to walk up the
ValueObject hierarchy to try and find its size).
This fixes an ASan error in lldb seen when debugging a clang binary.
I've added a regression test in test/functionalities/optimized_code. The
point of that test is not specifically to check that DW_OP_piece is
handled a particular way, but rather to check that lldb doesn't crash on
an input that it used to crash on.
Testing: check-lldb, and running the added tests using a sanitized lldb
--
Thanks to Jim for pointing out that an earlier version of this patch,
which simply changed the definition of Value::GetValueByteSize(), would
interact poorly with the ValueObject machinery.
Thanks also to Pavel who suggested a neat way to test this change
(which, incidentally, caught another ASan issue still present in the
original version of this patch).
rdar://58665925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73148
Reid Kleckner