We referred to all declaration in definitions in our diagnostic messages
which is can be inaccurate. Instead, classify the declaration and emit
an appropriate diagnostic for the new declaration and an appropriate
note pointing to the old one.
This fixes PR24116.
llvm-svn: 242190
We used to have a flag to enable module maps, and two more flags to enable
implicit module maps. This is all redundant; we don't need any flag for
enabling module maps in the abstract, and we don't usually have -fno- flags for
-cc1. We now have just a single flag, -fimplicit-module-maps, that enables
implicitly searching the file system for module map files and loading them.
The driver interface is unchanged for now. We should probably rename
-fmodule-maps to -fimplicit-module-maps at some point.
llvm-svn: 239789
Removes some old code that allowed a module to be loaded from a pcm file
even if the module.map could not be found. Also update a number of
tests that relied on the old behavior.
llvm-svn: 199852
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
(because they are part of some module) but have not been made visible
(because they are in a submodule that wasn't imported), filter out
those declarations unless both the old declaration and the new
declaration have external linkage. When one or both has internal
linkage, there should be no conflict unless both are imported.
llvm-svn: 171925
David Majnemer