Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
........
Fixes http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 362375
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
llvm-svn: 362358
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41909 describes an issue in which
a generic lambda that takes a dependent argument `auto set` causes the
template instantiation machinery for coroutine body statements to crash
with an ICE. The issue is two-fold:
1. The paths taken by the template instantiator contain several asserts
that the coroutine promise must not have a dependent type.
2. The template instantiator unconditionally builds corotuine statements
that depend on the promise type, which cannot be dependent.
To work around the issue, prevent the template instantiator from building
dependent coroutine statements if the coroutine promise type is dependent.
Since we only expect this to occur in the case of a generic lambda, limit
the workaround behavior to just that case.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, EricWF, lewissbaker, tks2103
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62550
llvm-svn: 362348
The previously added warning ended up causing false positives when
nothrow was used on member functions, where the exception specification
wasn't yet parsed. So, throw() and noexcept(true) both were incorrectly
warning. There doesn't seem to be a good way to force these to be parsed
to identify which they are (and likely should not be), so suppress the warning.
For now, unevaluated/uninstantiated are left as warnings as I am not
creative enough to find a reproducer that causes a false positive for
either.
llvm-svn: 362236
The implementation of the NoThrow ExceptionSpecificationType missed a
switch statement for forming the diagnostic when an out-of-line member
redeclaration misses the exception specification. This patch adds the
correct case statement.
llvm-svn: 362225
We need to know whether the destructor is trivial in order to tell
whether other parts of the class are valid (in particular, this affects
whether the type is a literal type, which affects whether defaulted
special members can be declared constexpr or are implicitly constexpr).
llvm-svn: 362184
and returned to the context in which 'this' should be captured.
This means we now always mark 'this' referenced from the context in
which it's actually referenced, rather than potentially from some
context nested within that.
llvm-svn: 362182
As reported here https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42000, it was
possible to get the constexpr version of __builtin_*_overflow to give
the wrong answer.
This was because when extending the operands to fit the largest type (so
that the math could be done), the decision on whether to sign/zero
extend the operands was based on the result signedness, not on the
operands signedness.
In the reported case, (unsigned char)255 - (int)100 needed
to have each extended to the int in order to do the math. However, when
extending the first operand to 'int', we incorrectly sign extended it
instead of zero extending. Thus, the result didnt fit back into the
unsigned char.
The fix for this was simply to choose zero/sign extension based on the
sign of the operand itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62665
llvm-svn: 362157
In response to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33235, it became
clear that the current mechanism of hacking through checks for the
exception specification of a function gets confused really quickly when
there are alternate exception specifiers.
This patch introcues EST_NoThrow, which is the equivilent of
EST_noexcept when caused by EST_noThrow. The existing implementation is
left in place to cover functions with no FunctionProtoType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62435
llvm-svn: 362119
We need to eagerly instantiate constexpr functions used in them even if
the default argument is never actually used, because we might evaluate
portions of it when performing semantic checks.
llvm-svn: 361670
HandleUnionActiveMemberChange forgot to walk over a nop implicit
conversion node and got stuck in the process.
As a cleanup I changed the declaration of `E` so it can't
be accidentally accessed after the loop.
llvm-svn: 361571
Summary:
This adds a new error for missing parentheses around lambdas in delete operators.
```
int main() {
delete []() { return new int(); }();
}
```
This will result in:
```
test.cpp:2:3: error: '[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:2:9: note: add parentheses around the lambda
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^
( )
```
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36357
llvm-svn: 361119
class type in constant evaluation.
This reinstates r360977, reverted in r360987, now that its rerequisite
patch is reinstated and fixed.
llvm-svn: 361067
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
This reinstates r360974, reverted in r360988, with a fix for a
static_assert failure on 32-bit builds: force Type base class to have
8-byte alignment like the rest of Clang's AST nodes.
llvm-svn: 360995
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
llvm-svn: 360974
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
evaluation.
This reinstates r360559, reverted in r360580, with a fix to avoid
crashing if evaluation-for-overflow mode encounters a virtual call on an
object of a class with a virtual base class, and to generally not try to
resolve virtual function calls to objects whose (notional) vptrs are not
readable. (The standard rules are unclear here, but this seems like a
reasonable approach.)
llvm-svn: 360635
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
This reinstates r360499, reverted in r360531.
llvm-svn: 360538
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
This reinstates r360464 (reverted in r360531) with a workaround for an
MSVC bug that previously caused the Windows bots to fail.
llvm-svn: 360537
Reject attempts to call non-static member functions on objects outside
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
........
Fix handling of objects under construction during constant expression
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
........
Fixes windows buildbots
llvm-svn: 360531
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
llvm-svn: 360499
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
llvm-svn: 360464
This fixes a crash where we would neglect to mark a destructor referenced for an
__attribute__((no_destory)) array. The destructor is needed though, since if an
exception is thrown we need to cleanup the elements.
rdar://48462498
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165
llvm-svn: 360446
Darwin if the version of libc++abi isn't new enough to include the fix
in r319123
This patch resurrects r264998, which was committed to work around a bug
in libc++abi that was causing _cxa_allocate_exception to return a memory
that wasn't double-word aligned.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160328/154332.html
In addition, this patch makes clang issue a warning if the type of the
thrown object requires an alignment that is larger than the minimum
guaranteed by the target C++ runtime.
rdar://problem/49864414
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61667
llvm-svn: 360404
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Summary:
e.g.
auto foo() {
return no_such_thing; // Return value is a TypoExpr
}
using T = decltype(foo()); // Uh-oh, undeduced auto.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61649
llvm-svn: 360224
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
where either the modification or the other access is unreachable.
This reverts r359984 (which reverted r359962). The bug in clang-tidy's
test suite exposed by the original commit was fixed in r360009.
llvm-svn: 360010
Simon Pilgrim