expressions are integer. It can also be ValueDecl expressions
Use the type information from the TemplateParameterList instead
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178611
When support was added for declaration arguments, the case of variadic
declaration arguments was not supported. This patch fixes that problem by
not crashing when certain ValueDecl's are null.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178610
Value depenedent expressions for default arguments cannot be evaluated.
Instead, use the desugared template type to get an argument expression that
can be used. This is needed for both integer and declaration arguements.
Also, move this common code into a separate function.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178609
When the template argument is both default and value dependent, the expression
retrieved for the default argument cannot be evaluated, thus never matching
any argument value. To get the proper value, get the template argument
from the desugared template specialization. Also, output the original
expression to provide more information about the argument mismatch.
llvm-svn: 177209
them the same if they are actually the same; having the same name isn't enough.
Similar to r174013, template template arguments were also mistakenly considered
the same when they had the same name but were in different namespaces.
In addition, when printing template template arguments, use the qualified name
if the regular name is the same.
llvm-svn: 174029
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
enough information so we can mangle them correctly in cases involving
dependent parameter types. (This specifically impacts cases involving
null pointers and cases involving parameters of reference type.)
Fix the mangler to use this information instead of trying to scavenge
it out of the parameter declaration.
<rdar://problem/12296776>.
llvm-svn: 164656
and remove ASTContext reference (which was frequently bound to a dereferenced
null pointer) from the recursive lump of printPretty functions. In so doing,
fix (at least) one case where we intended to use the 'dump' mode, but that
failed because a null ASTContext reference had been passed in.
llvm-svn: 162011
comparison between two templated types when they both appear in a diagnostic.
Type elision will remove indentical template arguments, which can be disabled
with -fno-elide-type. Cyan highlighting is applied to the differing types.
For more formatting, -fdiagnostic-show-template-tree will output the template
type as an indented text tree, with differences appearing inline. Template
tree works with or without type elision.
llvm-svn: 159216
of the first type is the same as the aka string of the second type, but both
types are different. Update the logic to print an aka for the first type to
show that they are different.
llvm-svn: 144558
of the function in question when applicable (that is, not for blocks).
Patch by Joerg Sonnenberger with some stylistic tweaks by me.
When discussing this weth Joerg, streaming the decl directly into the
diagnostic didn't work because we have a pointer-to-const, and the
overload doesn't accept such. In order to make my style tweaks to the
patch, I first changed the overload to accept a pointer-to-const, and
then changed the diagnostic printing layer to also use
a pointer-to-const, cleaning up a gross line of code along the way.
llvm-svn: 138854
When two different types has the same text representation in the same
diagnostic message, print an a.k.a. after the type if the a.k.a. gives extra
information about the type.
class versa_string;
typedef versa_string string;
namespace std {template <typename T> class vector;}
using std::vector;
void f(vector<string> v);
namespace std {
class basic_string;
typedef basic_string string;
template <typename T> class vector {};
void g() {
vector<string> v;
f(v);
}
}
Old message:
----------------
test.cc:15:3: error: no matching function for call to 'f'
f(&v);
^
test.cc:7:6: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from
'vector<string>' to 'vector<string>' for 1st argument
void f(vector<string> v);
^
1 error generated.
New message:
---------------
test.cc:15:3: error: no matching function for call to 'f'
f(v);
^
test.cc:7:6: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from
'vector<string>' (aka 'std::vector<std::basic_string>') to
'vector<string>' (aka 'std::vector<versa_string>') for 1st argument
void f(vector<string> v);
^
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 134904
involving rvalue references, to start scoping out what is and what
isn't implemented. In the process, tweak some standards citations,
type desugaring, and teach the tentative parser about && in
ptr-operator.
llvm-svn: 123913
space better. Remove this reference. To make that work, change some APIs
(most importantly, getDesugaredType()) to take an ASTContext& if they
need to return a QualType. Simultaneously, diminish the need to return a
QualType by introducing some useful APIs on SplitQualType, which is
just a std::pair<const Type *, Qualifiers>.
llvm-svn: 121478
references. This is a WIP as we should handle function pointers, etc. Reshuffle
the code to do this to facilitate recursing in this manner, and to check for
the type already being printed first rather than last.
llvm-svn: 103712
Richard Trieu