to use AddrMode4, there was a count of the registers stored in one of the
operands. I changed that to just count the operands but forgot to adjust for
the size of D registers. This was noticed by Evan as a performance problem
but it is a potential correctness bug as well, since it is possible that this
could merge a base update with a non-matching immediate.
llvm-svn: 113576
take multiple cycles to decode.
For the current if-converter clients (actually only ARM), the instructions that
are predicated on false are not nops. They would still take machine cycles to
decode. Micro-coded instructions such as LDM / STM can potentially take multiple
cycles to decode. If-converter should take treat them as non-micro-coded
simple instructions.
llvm-svn: 113570
- Output format and some of the code stolen from macho-dump.
- Somewhat incomplete and probably buggy.
- Comes with a very basic test.
llvm-svn: 113488
unrolling threshold to the optimize-for-size threshold. Basically, for loops containing calls, unrolling
can still be profitable as long as the loop is REALLY small.
llvm-svn: 113439
turning (fptrunc (sqrt (fpext x))) -> (sqrtf x) is great, but we have
to delete the original sqrt as well. Not doing so causes us to do
two sqrt's when building with -fmath-errno (the default on linux).
llvm-svn: 113260
always be disambiguated as sldtw. sldtw and sldtq with
a mem operands have the same effect, but sldtw is more
compact. Force it to sldtw, resolving rdar://8017530
llvm-svn: 113186
in the duplicated block instead of duplicating them.
Duplicating them into the end of the loop and the preheader
means that we got a phi node in the header of the loop,
which prevented LICM from hoisting them. GVN would
usually come around later and merge the duplicated
instructions so we'd get reasonable output... except that
anything dependent on the shoulda-been-hoisted value can't
be hoisted. In PR5319 (which this fixes), a memory value
didn't get promoted.
llvm-svn: 113134
Since mem2reg isn't run at -O0, we get a ton of reloads from the stack,
for example, before, this code:
int foo(int x, int y, int z) {
return x+y+z;
}
used to compile into:
_foo: ## @foo
subq $12, %rsp
movl %edi, 8(%rsp)
movl %esi, 4(%rsp)
movl %edx, (%rsp)
movl 8(%rsp), %edx
movl 4(%rsp), %esi
addl %edx, %esi
movl (%rsp), %edx
addl %esi, %edx
movl %edx, %eax
addq $12, %rsp
ret
Now we produce:
_foo: ## @foo
subq $12, %rsp
movl %edi, 8(%rsp)
movl %esi, 4(%rsp)
movl %edx, (%rsp)
movl 8(%rsp), %edx
addl 4(%rsp), %edx ## Folded load
addl (%rsp), %edx ## Folded load
movl %edx, %eax
addq $12, %rsp
ret
Fewer instructions and less register use = faster compiles.
llvm-svn: 113102
Bill Wendling