Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
ExpandTypeFromArgs
This fixes a bug in IRGen where a call to `llvm.objc.storeStrong` was
being emitted to initialize a __strong field of an uninitialized
temporary struct, which caused crashes at runtime.
rdar://problem/51807365
Currently, it is a modified version of the Itanium ABI, with the only
change being that constructors and destructors return 'this'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70575
AggValueSlot
This reapplies 8a5b7c3570 after a null
dereference bug in CGOpenMPRuntime::emitUserDefinedMapper.
Original commit message:
This is needed for the pointer authentication work we plan to do in the
near future.
a63a81bd99/clang/docs/PointerAuthentication.rst
Summary:
Fixes PR44205
I checked, and deleting destructors are not affected.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70931
Emit a gap region beginning where the switch body begins. This sets line
execution counts in the areas between non-overlapping cases to 0.
This also removes some special handling of the first case in a switch:
these are now treated like any other case.
This does not resolve an outstanding issue with case statement regions
that do not end when a region is terminated. But it should address
llvm.org/PR44011.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70571
This revision is revised to update Go-bindings and Release Notes.
The original commit message follows.
This patch, adds support for DW_AT_alignment[DWARF5] attribute, to be emitted with typdef DIE.
When explicit alignment is specified.
Patch by Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, jini.susan.george, SouraVX, alok,
deadalinx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70111
Summary:
Add support for vcadd_* family of intrinsics. This set of intrinsics is
available in Armv8.3-A.
The fp16 versions require the FP16 extension, which has been available
(opt-in) since Armv8.2-A.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70862
Summary: Fix PR43700
The ConstantEmitter in AggExprEmitter::EmitArrayInit was initialized
with the CodeGenFunction set to null, which caused the crash.
Also simplify another call, and make the CGF member a const pointer
since it is public but only assigned in the constructor.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70302
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
This originally landed in 9872ea4ed1
but got immediately reverted in cbfa237892
because the assertion was faulty. That fault ended up being caused
by the enum - while there will be promotion, both types are unsigned,
with same width. So we still don't need to sanitize non-signed cases.
So far. Maybe the assert will tell us this isn't so.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Refs. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
The asssertion that was added does not hold,
breaks on test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/analyze.c
Will reduce the testcase and revisit.
This reverts commit 9872ea4ed1, 870f3542d3.
This replaces the A32 NEON vqadds, vqaddu, vqsubs and vqsubu intrinsics
with the target independent sadd_sat, uadd_sat, ssub_sat and usub_sat.
This helps generate vqadds from standard IR nodes, which might be
produced from the vectoriser. The old variants are removed in the
process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69350
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
It is tricky to use replace_path_prefix correctly on Windows which uses
backslashes as native path separators. Switch back to the old approach
(startswith is not ideal) to appease build bots for now.
GCC 8 implements -fmacro-prefix-map. Like -fdebug-prefix-map, it replaces a string prefix for the __FILE__ macro.
-ffile-prefix-map is the union of -fdebug-prefix-map and -fmacro-prefix-map
Reviewed By: rnk, Lekensteyn, maskray
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49466
When generating ctor, FieldMemcpyizer wrongly treated zero-sized class members
as what should be copied, and generated wrong memcpy size under some special
circumstances. This patch tries to fix it.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70671
This has the main effect of causing target-cpu and target-features to be set
on __cfi_check_fail, causing the function to become ABI-compatible with other
functions in the case where these attributes affect ABI (e.g. reserve-x18).
Technically we only need to call SetLLVMFunctionAttributes to get the target-*
attributes set, but since we're creating a definition we probably ought to
call the ForDefinition function as well.
Fixes PR44094.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70692
Summary:
Currently, we ignore all locality attributes/info when building for
the device and thus all symblos are externally visible and can be
preemted at the runtime. It may lead to incorrect results. We need to
follow the same logic, compiler uses for static/pie builds. But in some
cases changing of dso locality may lead to problems with codegen, so
instead mark external symbols as hidden instead in the device code.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: guansong, caomhin, kkwli0, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70549
When the Dwarf Version metadata was initially added (r184276) there was
no support for Module::Max - though the comment suggested that was the
desired behavior. The original behavior was Module::Warn which would
warn and then pick whichever version came first - which is pretty
arbitrary/luck-based if the consumer has some need for one version or
the other.
Now that the functionality's been added (r303590) this change updates
the implementation to match the desired goal.
The general logic here is - if you compile /some/ of your program with a
more recent DWARF version, you must have a consumer that can handle it,
so might as well use it for /everything/.
The only place where this might fall down is if you have a need to use
an old tool (supporting only the older DWARF version) for some subset of
your program. In which case now it'll all be the higher version. That
seems pretty narrow (& the inverse could happen too - you specifically
/need/ the higher DWARF version for some extra expressivity, etc, in
some part of the program)
This avoids the need to include Attr.h in DeclCXX.h for a four-value
enum. Removing the include will be done separately, since it is large
and risky change.
even in DWARF 4 and earlier. This allows the debugger to recognize
them as direct functions as opposed to Objective-C methods.
<rdar://problem/57327663>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70544
According to OpenMP 5.0, if clause can be used in for simd directive. If
condition in the if clause if false, the non-vectorized version of the
loop must be executed.
Partial revert of r372681 "Support for DWARF-5 C++ language tags".
The change introduced new external linkage languages ("C++11" and
"C++14") which not supported in C++.
It also changed the definition of the existing enum to use the DWARF
constants. The problem is that "LinkageSpecDeclBits.Language" (the field
that reserves this enum) is actually defined as 3 bits length
(bitfield), which cannot contain the new DWARF constants. Defining the
enum as integer literals is more appropriate for maintaining valid
values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935
We seem to have been gradually growing support for atomic min/max operations
(exposing longstanding IR atomicrmw instructions). But until now there have
been gaps in the expected intrinsics. This adds support for the C11-style
intrinsics (i.e. taking _Atomic, rather than individually blessed by C11
standard), and the variants that return the new value instead of the original
one.
That way, people won't be misled by trying one form and it not working, and the
front-end is more friendly to people using _Atomic types, as we recommend.
For some reason we were not casting a fairly obscure class of builtin calls we
expected to be polymorphic to vectors of char. It worked because the only
affected intrinsics weren't actually polymorphic after all, but is
unnecessarily complicated.
It turns out that the ExprMutationAnalyzer can be very slow when AST
gets huge in some cases. The idea is to move this analysis to the LLVM
back-end level (more precisely, in the LiveDebugValues pass). The new
approach will remove the performance regression, simplify the
implementation and give us front-end independent implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68206
According to OpenMP 5.0, if clause can be used in simd directive. If
condition in the if clause if false, the non-vectorized version of the
loop must be executed.
Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the
target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values
(DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent).
Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU
tail calls.
Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call:
```
* frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
```
Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible):
```
* frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial]
frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
```
This was reverted in 5b9a072c because it attached declaration
subprograms to inlinable builtin calls, which interacted badly with the
MergeICmps pass. The fix is to not attach declarations to builtins.
rdar://46577651
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743
Cleanup handling of the denormal-fp-math attribute. Consolidate places
checking the allowed names in one place.
This is in preparation for introducing FP type specific variants of
the denormal-fp-mode attribute. AMDGPU will switch to using this in
place of the current hacky use of subtarget features for the denormal
mode.
Introduce a new header for dealing with FP modes. The constrained
intrinsic classes define related enums that should also be moved into
this header for uses in other contexts.
The verifier could use a check to make sure the denorm-fp-mode
attribute is sane, but there currently isn't one.
Currently, DAGCombiner incorrectly asssumes non-IEEE behavior by
default in the one current user. Clang must be taught to start
emitting this attribute by default to avoid regressions when this is
switched to assume ieee behavior if the attribute isn't present.
Assign artificial locations to calls to special struct-related helper
functions.
Such calls may not inherit a location if emitted within FinishFunction,
at which point the lexical scope stack may be empty, causing CGDebugInfo
to report the current DebugLoc as empty.
Fixes an IR verifier complaint about a call to '__destructor_8_s0' not
having a !dbg location attached.
rdar://57293361
checkTargetFeatures was incorrectly checking for cpu_specific instead of
just 'target'. While this function was never called in that situation,
it seemed correct to fix the condition. Additionally, multiversion
functions can never be always_inline, but if any function accidentially
ended up here we shouldn't diagnose.
Note that the adding of target-features to the list is unnecessary since
the getFunctionFeatureMap actually considers attribute target,
however adding it results in significantly better error messages by
putting the 'target' features first (and thus first to fail).
Otherwise, the error message would be the first feature 'implied' by the
target attribute, and not necessarily the feature listed in the
attribute itself.
__attribute__((objc_direct)) is an attribute on methods declaration, and
__attribute__((objc_direct_members)) on implementation, categories or
extensions.
A `direct` property specifier is added (@property(direct) type name)
These attributes / specifiers cause the method to have no associated
Objective-C metadata (for the property or the method itself), and the
calling convention to be a direct C function call.
The symbol for the method has enforced hidden visibility and such direct
calls are hence unreachable cross image. An explicit C function must be
made if so desired to wrap them.
The implicit `self` and `_cmd` arguments are preserved, however to
maintain compatibility with the usual `objc_msgSend` semantics,
3 fundamental precautions are taken:
1) for instance methods, `self` is nil-checked. On arm64 backends this
typically adds a single instruction (cbz x0, <closest-ret>) to the
codegen, for the vast majority of the cases when the return type is a
scalar.
2) for class methods, because the class may not be realized/initialized
yet, a call to `[self self]` is emitted. When the proper deployment
target is used, this is optimized to `objc_opt_self(self)`.
However, long term we might want to emit something better that the
optimizer can reason about. When inlining kicks in, these calls
aren't optimized away as the optimizer has no idea that a single call
is really necessary.
3) the calling convention for the `_cmd` argument is changed: the caller
leaves the second argument to the call undefined, and the selector is
loaded inside the body when it's referenced only.
As far as error reporting goes, the compiler refuses:
- making any overloads direct,
- making an overload of a direct method,
- implementations marked as direct when the declaration in the
interface isn't (the other way around is allowed, as the direct
attribute is inherited from the declaration),
- marking methods required for protocol conformance as direct,
- messaging an unqualified `id` with a direct method,
- forming any @selector() expression with only direct selectors.
As warnings:
- any inconsistency of direct-related calling convention when
@selector() or messaging is used,
- forming any @selector() expression with a possibly direct selector.
Lastly an `objc_direct_members` attribute is added that can decorate
`@implementation` blocks and causes methods only declared there (and in
no `@interface`) to be automatically direct. When decorating an
`@interface` then all methods and properties declared in this block are
marked direct.
Radar-ID: rdar://problem/2684889
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69991
Reviewed-By: John McCall
and a follow-up NFC rearrangement as it's causing a crash on valid. Testcase is on the original review thread.
This reverts commits af57dbf12e and e6584b2b7b
This adds the `vcmp` family of ACLE MVE intrinsics: vector/vector,
vector/scalar, and the predicated forms of both. All are represented
using standard existing IR: vector/scalar comparisons are represented
by making a vector out of the scalar first, and predicated forms are
represented by taking the bitwise AND of the input predicate and the
output of the comparison. Existing LLVM-side tests demonstrate that
ISel will pattern-match all of that back down to single MVE VCMPs.
The idiom of handling a vector/scalar operation by generating IR to
expand the scalar into a second vector is going to be needed for a lot
of MVE intrinsics, so to make that easy, I've provided a helper
function that automatically works out the element count.
The comparison intrinsics are the first ones that have to //return// a
predicate, in the user-facing `mve_pred16_t` format. This means we
have to use the `arm_mve_pred_v2i` low-level intrinsic to convert it
back from the logical `<n x i1>` form used in IR. I've done that
explicitly in the code gen specification for the builtins, because it
happens much more rarely in the ACLE API than passing a Predicate as
input, so it didn't seem worth automating in MveEmitter.
Reviewers: ostannard, MarkMurrayARM, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70297
Alexey Bataev