actually perform value initialization rather than trying to fake it with a call
to the default constructor. Fixes various bugs related to the previously-missing
zero-initialization in this case.
I've also moved this and the other list initialization 'special case' from
TryConstructorInitialization into TryListInitialization where they belong.
llvm-svn: 159733
trivial if the implicit declaration would be. Don't forget to set the Trivial
flag on the special member as well as on the class. It doesn't seem ideal that
we have two separate mechanisms for storing this information, but this patch
does not attempt to address that.
This leaves us in an interesting position where the has_trivial_X trait for a
class says 'yes' for a deleted but trivial X, but is_trivially_Xable says 'no'.
This seems to be what the standard requires.
llvm-svn: 151465
trivial default constructors. This generated-code regression was
caused by r131796, which had simplified the handling of default
initialization in Sema. Fixes <rdar://problem/9694300>.
llvm-svn: 134260
the bases are completely initialized. This won't work --- base
initializer expressions can rely on the vtables having been set up.
Check for uses of 'this' in the initializers and force a vtable
initialization if found.
This might not be good enough; we might need to extend this to handle
the possibility of arbitrary code finding an external reference to this
(not yet completely-constructed!) object and accessing through it,
in which case we'll probably find ourselves doing a lot more unnecessary
stores.
llvm-svn: 114153
through the bases and fields of the definition of the class in which
the constructor is declared, rather than some other declaration of
that class.
llvm-svn: 99661
InitializationSequence. Specially, switch initialization of a C++
class type (either copy- or direct-initialization).
Also, make sure that we create an elidable copy-construction when
performing copy initialization of a C++ class variable. Fixes PR5826.
llvm-svn: 91750
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Stephen Lin