Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hans Wennborg 8eb336c14e Re-commit r269828 "X86: Avoid using _chkstk when lowering WIN_ALLOCA instructions"
with an additional fix to make RegAllocFast ignore undef physreg uses. It would
previously get confused about the "push %eax" instruction's use of eax. That
method for adjusting the stack pointer is used in X86FrameLowering::emitSPUpdate
as well, but since that runs after register-allocation, we didn't run into the
RegAllocFast issue before.

llvm-svn: 269949
2016-05-18 16:10:17 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 759af30109 Revert r269828 "X86: Avoid using _chkstk when lowering WIN_ALLOCA instructions"
Seems to have broken the Windows ASan bot. Reverting while investigating.

llvm-svn: 269833
2016-05-17 20:38:56 +00:00
Hans Wennborg c3fb51171e X86: Avoid using _chkstk when lowering WIN_ALLOCA instructions
This patch moves the expansion of WIN_ALLOCA pseudo-instructions
into a separate pass that walks the CFG and lowers the instructions
based on a conservative estimate of the offset between the stack
pointer and the lowest accessed stack address.

The goal is to reduce binary size and run-time costs by removing
calls to _chkstk. While it doesn't fix all the code quality problems
with inalloca calls, it's an incremental improvement for PR27076.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20263

llvm-svn: 269828
2016-05-17 20:13:29 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 65f9d9cd32 Revert "[X86] Elide references to _chkstk for dynamic allocas"
This reverts commit r262370.

It turns out there is code out there that does sequences of allocas
greater than 4K: http://crbug.com/591404

The goal of this change was to improve the code size of inalloca call
sequences, but we got tangled up in the mess of dynamic allocas.
Instead, we should come back later with a separate MI pass that uses
dominance to optimize the full sequence. This should also be able to
remove the often unneeded stacksave/stackrestore pairs around the call.

llvm-svn: 262505
2016-03-02 19:20:59 +00:00
David Majnemer 791b88b6da [X86] Elide references to _chkstk for dynamic allocas
The _chkstk function is called by the compiler to probe the stack in an
order consistent with Windows' expectations.  However, it is possible to
elide the call to _chkstk and manually adjust the stack pointer if we
can prove that the allocation is fixed size and smaller than the probe
size.

This shrinks chrome.dll, chrome_child.dll and chrome.exe by a
cummulative ~133 KB.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17679

llvm-svn: 262370
2016-03-01 19:20:23 +00:00
David Majnemer c4ab61cb2f IR: Change inalloca's grammar a bit
The grammar for LLVM IR is not well specified in any document but seems
to obey the following rules:

 - Attributes which have parenthesized arguments are never preceded by
   commas.  This form of attribute is the only one which ever has
   optional arguments.  However, not all of these attributes support
   optional arguments: 'thread_local' supports an optional argument but
   'addrspace' does not.  Interestingly, 'addrspace' is documented as
   being a "qualifier".  What constitutes a qualifier?  I cannot find a
   definition.

 - Some attributes use a space between the keyword and the value.
   Examples of this form are 'align' and 'section'.  These are always
   preceded by a comma.

 - Otherwise, the attribute has no argument.  These attributes do not
   have a preceding comma.

Sometimes an attribute goes before the instruction, between the
instruction and it's type, or after it's type.  'atomicrmw' has
'volatile' between the instruction and the type while 'call' has 'tail'
preceding the instruction.

With all this in mind, it seems most consistent for 'inalloca' on an
'inalloca' instruction to occur before between the instruction and the
type.  Unlike the current formulation, there would be no preceding
comma.  The combination 'alloca inalloca' doesn't look particularly
appetizing, perhaps a better spelling of 'inalloca' is down the road.

llvm-svn: 203376
2014-03-09 06:41:58 +00:00
Reid Kleckner dfbed59cc2 Don't put non-static allocas in the static alloca map
Allocas marked inalloca are never static, but we were trying to put them
into the static alloca map if they were in the entry block.  Also add an
assertion in x86 fastisel.

llvm-svn: 200593
2014-01-31 23:45:12 +00:00