Now the backend supports the natural LLVM IR, we can shamelessly steal the
AArch64 front-end code to implement the vshrn intrinsic on 32-bit ARM.
llvm-svn: 201086
The CMake install(DIRECTORY) command documents that it sets permissions
on directories it is asked to install. Since the <prefix>/include
directory may not be exclusive to the LLVM/Clang installation, we should
not ask CMake to manage permissions of that directory for us. Instead,
give only our own include/clang and include/clang-c subdirectories to
the install(DIRECTORY) command.
Fixes PR4500. Patch by Brad King.
llvm-svn: 201076
Rather than simply saying "X is not a class or namespace", clarify what
X is by providing the aka type in the case where X is a type, or
pointing to the named declaration if there's an unambiguous one to refer
to. In the ambiguous case, the ambiguities are already enumerated
(though could be clarified by describing what kind of entities they are)
Included a few FIXMEs in tests where some further improvements could be
made.
llvm-svn: 201038
TargetInfo::getSuitableAlign() was introduced in r146762 and is defined
as alignof(std::max_align_t).
Introduce __ALIGNOF_MAX_ALIGN_T__ which exposes getSuitableAlign() so
that libc++ may take advantage of it.
llvm-svn: 201037
template parameters, don't look for parameters of outer templates. If a problem
is found in a default template argument, point the diagnostic at the partial
specialization (with a note pointing at the default argument) instead of
pointing it at the default argument and leaving it unclear which partial
specialization os problematic.
llvm-svn: 201031
unique them and permits the implementation of dynamic_cast (and
anything else which knows it's working with a complete class
type) to compare their addresses directly.
rdar://16005328
llvm-svn: 201020
Summary:
This avoids false positives from -Wmicrosoft when name lookup would
normally succeed in standard C++. This triggered on a common CRTP
pattern in clang, where a derived class would have a private using decl
to pull in members of a dependent base:
class Verifier : InstVisitor<Verifier> {
private:
using InstVisitor<Verifier>::visit;
...
void anything() {
visit(); // warned here
}
};
Real access checks pass here because we're in the context of the
Verifier, but the -Wmicrosoft extension was just looking for the private
access specifier.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2679
llvm-svn: 201019
'operator delete' or 'operator delete[]' is an explicit exception
specification. Therefore we should diagnose 'void operator delete(void*)'
instead of 'void operator delete(void*) noexcept'.
This diagnostic remains an ExtWarn, since in practice people don't always
include the exception specification in such a declaration.
llvm-svn: 201002
Hopefully the last tweak needed to get this test working everywhere.
Remove matching of the prefix of sys_header.h, which was never the point
of the test anyway. This avoids dealing with path separators.
llvm-svn: 200987
This means always walking the whole call stack for the end path node, but
we'll assume that's always fairly tractable.
<rdar://problem/15952973>
llvm-svn: 200980
We don't stat the system headers to check for stalenes during regular
PCH loading for performance reasons. When explicitly saying
-verify-pch, we want to check all the dependencies - user or system.
llvm-svn: 200979
An HFA is defined as a struct containing floating point values of the
same machine type. In the 32-bit ABI, double and long double have the
same machine type, so a struct with a mixture of these types must be an
HFA (assuming it meets the other criteria).
llvm-svn: 200971
hack of passing -fconst-strings to -cc1"
Passing or not a language option based on diagnostic settings is a bad idea, it breaks
using a PCH that was compiled with different diagnostic settings.
Also add a test case to make sure we don't regress.
llvm-svn: 200964
If we are in the middle of defining the class, don't attempt to
validate previously annotated declarations. We may not have seen base
specifiers or virtual method declarations yet.
llvm-svn: 200959
type-dependent variable, even if the initializer isn't value-dependent. This
happens for ParenListExprs composed of non-value-dependent subexpressions, for
instance.
We should really give ParenListExprs (and InitListExprs) the type of the
initialized entity if they're used to represent a dependent initialization (and
if so, set them to be type-, value- and instantiation-dependent).
llvm-svn: 200954
Use the verify hook rather than the compile hook to represent the
-verify-pch action, and move the exising --verify-debug-info action
into its own subclass of VerifyJobAction. Incidentally change the name
printed by -ccc-print-phases for --verify-debug-info.
llvm-svn: 200938
Properly support fields that come from anonymous unions and structs
when used as template arguments for pointer to data member params.
llvm-svn: 200921
Properly determine the inheritance model when dealing with nullptr:
- If a nullptr template argument is being checked against
pointer-to-member parameter, nail down an inheritance model.
N.B. We will chose an inheritance model even if we won't ultimately
choose the template to instantiate! Cooky, right?
- Null pointer-to-datamembers have a virtual base table offset of -1,
not zero. Previously, we chose an offset of 0.
llvm-svn: 200920
clang/test/FixIt/fixit-unicode-with-utf8-output.c has begun complained since LLVM r200885.
Although it is changes for StringRef, it brought LLVM_ON_WIN32 to Support/Locale.cpp.
Before r200885, LLVM_ON_WIN32 was undefined in Locale.cpp!
FIXME: We should consider i18n on win32.
llvm-svn: 200909
In the following code:
struct A { static const int sz; };
template<class T> void f() { T arr[A::sz]; }
the array 'arr' is represented as a variable size array in the template.
If 'A::sz' gets value below in the translation unit, the array in
instantiation can turn into constant size array.
This change fixes PR18633.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2688
llvm-svn: 200899
using-declaration, and they declare the same function (either because
the using-declaration is in the same namespace as the declaration it
imports, or because they're both extern "C"), they do not conflict.
llvm-svn: 200897
Tim Northover