thunk's return value slot directly when the return type is an aggregate
instead of doing so via a temporary
This fixes PR45997 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45997), which
is caused by a bug that has existed since we started passing and
returning C++ structs with ObjC strong pointer members (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908) or structs annotated with trivial_abi
directly.
rdar://problem/63740936
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82513
Summary:
This is needed in Swift for C++ interop -- see here for the corresponding Swift change:
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/30630
As part of this change, I've had to make some changes to the interface of CGCXXABI to return the additional parameters separately rather than adding them directly to a `CallArgList`.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79942
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<RecordType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373584
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862 removed the usages of `ASTContext&` from
within the `CXXMethodDecl::getThisType` method. Remove the parameter
altogether, as well as all usages of it. This does not result in any
functional change because the parameter was unused since
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: akyrtzi, mikael
Reviewed By: mikael
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56509
llvm-svn: 350914
Summary:
Previously we tried too hard to uphold the fiction that destructor
variants work like they do on Itanium throughout the ABI-neutral parts
of clang. This lead to MS C++ ABI incompatiblities and other bugs. Now,
-mconstructor-aliases will no longer control this ABI detail, and clang
-cc1's LLVM IR output will be this much closer to the clang driver's.
Based on a patch by Zahira Ammarguellat:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39063
I've tried to move the logic that Zahira added into MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp.
There is only one ABI-specific detail sticking out, and that is in
CodeGenModule::getAddrOfCXXStructor, where we collapse complete dtors to
base dtors in the MS ABI.
This fixes PR32990.
Reviewers: erichkeane, zahiraam, majnemer, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44505
llvm-svn: 327732
Summary:
The MS ABI convention is that the 'this' pointer on entry is the address
of the vfptr that was used to make the virtual method call. In other
words, the pointer on entry always points to the base subobject that
introduced the virtual method. Consider this hierarchy:
struct A { virtual void f() = 0; };
struct B { virtual void g() = 0; };
struct C : A, B {
void f() override;
void g() override;
};
On entry to C::g, [ER]CX will contain the address of C's B subobject,
and C::g will have to subtract sizeof(A) to recover a pointer to C.
Before this change, we applied this adjustment in the prologue and
stored the new value into the "this" local variable alloca used for
debug info. However, MSVC does not do this, presumably because it is
often profitable to fold the adjustment into later field accesses. This
creates a problem, because the debugger expects the variable to be
unadjusted. Unfortunately, CodeView doesn't have anything like DWARF
expressions for computing variables that aren't in the program anymore,
so we have to declare 'this' to be the unadjusted value if we want the
debugger to see the right value.
This has the side benefit that, in optimized builds, the 'this' pointer
will usually be available on function entry because it doesn't require
any adjustment.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: aprantl, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40109
llvm-svn: 318440
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
Summary:
If the first parameter of the function is the ImplicitParamDecl, codegen
automatically marks it as an implicit argument with `this` or `self`
pointer. Added internal kind of the ImplicitParamDecl to separate
'this', 'self', 'vtt' and other implicit parameters from other kind of
parameters.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735
llvm-svn: 305075
abstract information about the callee. NFC.
The goal here is to make it easier to recognize indirect calls and
trigger additional logic in certain cases. That logic will come in
a later patch; in the meantime, I felt that this was a significant
improvement to the code.
llvm-svn: 285258
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
Certain CXXConstructExpr nodes require zero-initialization before a
constructor is called. We had a bug in the case where the constructor
is called on a virtual base: we zero-initialized the base's vbptr field.
A complementary bug is present in MSVC where no zero-initialization
occurs for the subobject at all.
This fixes PR25370.
llvm-svn: 251783
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
This avoids building a fake LLVM IR global variable just to ferry an i32
down into LLVM codegen. It also puts a nail in the coffin of using MS
ABI C++ EH with landingpads, since now we'll assert in the lpad code
when flags are present.
llvm-svn: 247843
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
Summary:
This add support for the C++11 feature, thread_local global variables.
The ABI Clang implements is an improvement of the MSVC ABI. Sadly,
further improvements could be made but not without sacrificing ABI
compatibility.
The feature is implemented as follows:
- All thread_local initialization routines are pointed to from the
.CRT$XDU section.
- All non-weak thread_local variables have their initialization routines
call from a single function instead of getting their own .CRT$XDU
section entry. This is done to open up optimization opportunities to
the compiler.
- All weak thread_local variables have their own .CRT$XDU section entry.
This entry is in a COMDAT with the global variable it is initializing;
this ensures that we will initialize the global exactly once.
- Destructors are registered in the initialization function using
__tlregdtor.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5597
llvm-svn: 219074
Let's not expose ABI specific minutia inside of CodeGenModule and Type.
Instead, let's abstract it through CXXABI.
This gets rid of:
CodeGenModule::getCompleteObjectLocator,
CodeGenModule::EmitFundamentalTypeDescriptor{s,},
CodeGenModule::getMSTypeDescriptor,
CodeGenModule::getMSCompleteObjectLocator,
CGCXXABI::shouldRTTIBeUnique,
CGCXXABI::classifyRTTIUniqueness.
CGRTTI was *almost* entirely centered around providing Itanium-style
RTTI information. Instead of providing interfaces that only it
consumes, move it to the ItaniumCXXABI implementation file. This allows
it to have access to Itanium-specific implementation details without
providing useless expansion points for the Microsoft ABI side.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4261
llvm-svn: 212435
This undoes half of r208786.
It had problems with lazily declared special members in cases like this:
struct A {
A();
A &operator=(A &&o);
void *p;
};
void foo(A);
void bar() {
foo({});
}
In this case, the copy and move constructors are implicitly deleted.
However, Clang doesn't eagerly declare the copy ctor in the AST, so we
pass the struct in registers. Furthermore, GCC passes this in registers
even though this class should be uncopyable.
Revert this for now until the dust settles.
llvm-svn: 208836
This affects both the Itanium and Microsoft C++ ABIs.
This is in anticipation of a change to the Itanium C++ ABI, and should
match GCC's current behavior. The new text will likely be:
"""
Pass an object of class type by value if every copy constructor and
move constructor is deleted or trivial and at least one of them is not
deleted, and the destructor is trivial.
"""
http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2014-May/002728.html
On x86 Windows, we can mostly use the same logic, where we use inalloca
instead of passing by address. However, on Win64, there are register
parameters, and we have to do what MSVC does. MSVC ignores the presence
of non-trivial move constructors and only considers the presence of
non-trivial or deleted copy constructors. If a non-trivial or deleted
copy ctor is present, it passes the argument indirectly.
This change fixes bugs and makes us more ABI compatible with both GCC
and MSVC.
Fixes PR19668.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3660
llvm-svn: 208786
The MS ABI requires that we determine the vbptr offset if have a
virtual inheritance model. Instead, raise an error pointing to the
diagnostic when this happens.
This fixes PR18583.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2842
llvm-svn: 201824
Unlike Itanium's VTTs, the 'most derived' boolean or bitfield is the
last parameter for non-variadic constructors, rather than the second.
For variadic constructors, the 'most derived' parameter comes after the
'this' parameter. This affects constructor calls and constructor decls
in a variety of places.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2405
llvm-svn: 197518
Static locals requiring initialization are not thread safe on Windows.
Unfortunately, it's possible to create static locals that are actually
externally visible with inline functions and templates. As a result, we
have to implement an initialization guard scheme that is compatible with
TUs built by MSVC, which makes thread safety prohibitively difficult.
MSVC's scheme is that every function that requires a guard gets an i32
bitfield. Each static local is assigned a bit that indicates if it has
been initialized, up to 32 bits, at which point a new bitfield is
created. MSVC rejects inline functions with more than 32 static locals,
and the externally visible mangling (?_B) only allows for one guard
variable per function.
On Eli's recommendation, I used MangleNumberingContext to track which
bit each static corresponds to.
Implements PR16888.
Reviewers: rjmccall, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1416
llvm-svn: 190427
This reverts commit r189320.
Alexey Samsonov and Dmitry Vyukov presented some arguments for keeping
these around - though it still seems like those tasks could be solved by
a tool just using the symbol table. In a very small number of cases,
thunks may be inlined & debug info might be able to save profilers &
similar tools from misclassifying those cases as part of the caller.
The extra changes here plumb through the VarDecl for various cases to
CodeGenFunction - this provides better fidelity through a few APIs but
generally just causes the CGF::StartFunction to fallback to using the
name of the IR function as the name in the debug info.
The changes to debug-info-global-ctor-dtor.cpp seem like goodness. The
two names that go missing (in favor of only emitting those names as
linkage names) are names that can be demangled - emitting them only as
the linkage name should encourage tools to do just that.
Again, thanks to Dinesh Dwivedi for investigation/work on this issue.
llvm-svn: 189421
This function only makes sense there. Eventually it should no longer
be part of the CGCXXABI interface, as it is an Itanium-specific detail.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D821
llvm-svn: 185213
In Itanium, dynamic classes have one vtable with several different
address points for dynamic base classes that can't share vtables.
In the MS C++ ABI, each vbtable that can't be shared gets its own
symbol, similar to how ctor vtables work in Itanium. However, instead
of mangling the subobject offset into the symbol, the unique portions of
the inheritance path are mangled into the symbol to make it unique.
This patch implements the MSVC 2012 scheme for forming unique vbtable
symbol names. MSVC 2010 use the same mangling with a different subset
of the path. Implementing that mangling and possibly others is TODO.
Each vbtable is an array of i32 offsets from the vbptr that points to it
to another virtual base subobject. The first entry of a vbtable always
points to the base of the current subobject, implying that it is the
same no matter which parent class contains it.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D636
llvm-svn: 184309
Summary:
This only supports converting along non-virtual inheritance paths by
changing the field offset or the non-virtual base adjustment.
This implements three kinds of conversions:
- codegen for Value conversions
- Constant emission for APValue
- Constant folding for CastExprs
In almost all constant initialization settings
EmitMemberPointer(APValue) is called, except when the expression
contains a reinterpret cast.
reinterpret casts end up being a big corner case because the null value
changes between different kinds of member pointers.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D741
llvm-svn: 181543
non-constant constructors or non-trivial destructors. Plus bugfixes for
thread_local references bound to temporaries (the temporaries themselves are
lifetime-extended to become thread_local), and the corresponding case for
std::initializer_list.
llvm-svn: 179496
Summary:
For non-dynamic classes (no virtual bases), member data pointers are
simple offsets from the base of the record. Dynamic classes use an
aggregate for member data pointers and are therefore currently
unsupported.
Unlike Itanium, the ms ABI uses 0 to represent null for polymorphic
classes. Non-polymorphic classes use -1 like Itanium, since 0 is a
valid field offset.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: timurrrr, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D558
llvm-svn: 177753
and only consider using __cxa_atexit in the Itanium logic. The
default logic is to use atexit().
Emit "guarded" initializers in Microsoft mode unconditionally.
This is definitely not correct, but it's closer to correct than
just not emitting the initializer.
Based on a patch by Timur Iskhodzhanov!
llvm-svn: 155894
what I'm going to treat as basically universal properties of
array-cookie code. Implement MS array cookies on top of that.
Based on a patch by Timur Iskhodzhanov!
llvm-svn: 155886
Akira Hatanaka