Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Quentin Colombet cf9732b417 [X86] Make sure we do not clobber RBX with cmpxchg when used as a base pointer.
cmpxchg[8|16]b uses RBX as one of its argument.
In other words, using this instruction clobbers RBX as it is defined to hold one
the input. When the backend uses dynamically allocated stack, RBX is used as a
reserved register for the base pointer. 

Reserved registers have special semantic that only the target understands and
enforces, because of that, the register allocator don’t use them, but also,
don’t try to make sure they are used properly (remember it does not know how
they are supposed to be used).

Therefore, when RBX is used as a reserved register but defined by something that
is not compatible with that use, the register allocator will not fix the
surrounding code to make sure it gets saved and restored properly around the
broken code. This is the responsibility of the target to do the right thing with
its reserved register.

To fix that, when the base pointer needs to be preserved, we use a different
pseudo instruction for cmpxchg that save rbx.
That pseudo takes two more arguments than the regular instruction:
- One is the value to be copied into RBX to set the proper value for the
  comparison.
- The other is the virtual register holding the save of the value of RBX as the
  base pointer. This saving is done as part of isel (i.e., we emit a copy from
  rbx).

cmpxchg_save_rbx <regular cmpxchg args>, input_for_rbx_reg, save_of_rbx_as_bp

This gets expanded into:
rbx = copy input_for_rbx_reg
cmpxchg <regular cmpxchg args>
rbx = save_of_rbx_as_bp

Note: The actual modeling of the pseudo is a bit more complicated to make sure
the interferes that appears after the pseudo gets expanded are properly modeled
before that expansion.

This fixes PR26883.

llvm-svn: 263325
2016-03-12 02:25:27 +00:00
Hans Wennborg dcc2500452 X86: More efficient legalization of wide integer compares
In particular, this makes the code for 64-bit compares on 32-bit targets
much more efficient.

Example:

  define i32 @test_slt(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
  entry:
    %cmp = icmp slt i64 %a, %b
    br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
  bb1:
    ret i32 1
  bb2:
    ret i32 2
  }

Before this patch:

  test_slt:
          movl    4(%esp), %eax
          movl    8(%esp), %ecx
          cmpl    12(%esp), %eax
          setae   %al
          cmpl    16(%esp), %ecx
          setge   %cl
          je      .LBB2_2
          movb    %cl, %al
  .LBB2_2:
          testb   %al, %al
          jne     .LBB2_4
          movl    $1, %eax
          retl
  .LBB2_4:
          movl    $2, %eax
          retl

After this patch:

  test_slt:
          movl    4(%esp), %eax
          movl    8(%esp), %ecx
          cmpl    12(%esp), %eax
          sbbl    16(%esp), %ecx
          jge     .LBB1_2
          movl    $1, %eax
          retl
  .LBB1_2:
          movl    $2, %eax
          retl

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14496

llvm-svn: 253572
2015-11-19 16:35:08 +00:00
David Blaikie a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
Tim Northover 6c647eae8b X86: remove temporary atomicrmw used during lowering.
We construct a temporary "atomicrmw xchg" instruction when lowering atomic
stores for widths that aren't supported natively. This isn't on the top-level
worklist though, so it won't be removed automatically and we have to do it
ourselves once that itself has been lowered.

Thanks Saleem for pointing this out!

llvm-svn: 212948
2014-07-14 15:31:13 +00:00
Tim Northover 277066ab43 X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs.
The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in
terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It
also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help
out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible
instructions..

rdar://problem/13496295

llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-01 18:53:31 +00:00