Fixes PR30964. The old behavior can be achieved using a setting.
Patch by: Andras Leitereg!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28667
llvm-svn: 292938
Summary:
rL270567 excluded trivially copyable types from being moved by
modernize-pass-by-value, but it didn't exclude references to them.
Change types used in the tests to not be trivially copyable.
Reviewers: madsravn, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28614
llvm-svn: 291796
Summary:
Default member initializers cannot refer to constructor parameters, but modernize-default-member-init was trying to when the default constructor had default arguments.
Change the check to ignore default arguments to the default constructor.
Fixes PR31524.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, JDevlieghere, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28287
llvm-svn: 290972
Summary:
An addition to the move-constructor-init check was duplicating the
modernize-pass-by-value check.
Remove the additional check and UseCERTSemantics option.
Run the move-constructor-init test with both checks enabled.
Fix modernize-pass-by-value false-positive when initializing a base
class.
Add option to modernize-pass-by-value to only warn about parameters
that are already values.
Reviewers: alexfh, flx, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26453
llvm-svn: 290051
Summary:
Use auto when declaring variables that are initialized by calling a templated
function that returns its explicit first argument.
Fixes PR26763.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, staronj, Prazek
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27166
llvm-svn: 289797
Summary:
Warn about special member functions that only contain a comment.
Report the location of the special member function, unless it is
defined in a macro. Reporting the location of the body in a macro is
more helpful as it causes the macro expansion location to be reported too.
Fixes PR30920.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26741
llvm-svn: 287215
Summary:
Duplicate fixes were being created for explicit template instantiations
of out-of-line constructors or destructors.
Fixes PR30921.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26582
llvm-svn: 287091
Summary:
Extend modernize-use-auto to cases when a variable is assigned with a cast.
e.g.
Type *Ptr1 = dynamic_cast<Type*>(Ptr2);
http://llvm.org/PR25499
Reviewers: angelgarcia, aaron.ballman, klimek, Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: Prazek, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25316
llvm-svn: 285579
Summary:
clang-tidy now cleans up after replacements, so leave colon and comma
removal to that.
Reviewers: angelgarcia, alexfh, aaron.ballman, djasper, ioeric
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25769
llvm-svn: 284735
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy and i should hope this one is the correct mailing list.
The check is modernize-avoid-bind.
Consider the following:
void bar(int x, int y);
namespace N {
void bar(int x, int y);
}
void foo(){
auto Test = std::bind(N::bar,1,1);
}
clang-tidy’s modernize-avoid-bind check suggests writing:
void foo(){
auto Test =[] {return bar(1,1);};
}
instead of:
void foo(){
auto Test = [] {return N::bar(1,1);};
}
So clang-tidy has proposed an incorrect Fix.
Patch by IdrissRio!
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscriber: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 284719
Summary:
This fixes a false-positive e.g. when string literals are returned from if statement.
This patch includes as well a small fix to includes and renames of the test suite that collided with the name of the check.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: hokein
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25558
llvm-svn: 284212
Summary:
Only member initializers that are written should prevent
using '= default' on a default constructor.
Reviewers: klimek, sbenza, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24444
llvm-svn: 283869
Summary:
Bugfix for 27321. When the constructor of stored pointer
type is private then it is invalid to change it to
make_shared or make_unique.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23343
llvm-svn: 280180
Summary:
Depends on D23204.
This is intended to be submitted immediately after D23204 lands.
Reviewers: jdennett, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23543
llvm-svn: 278934
This patch introduces a minor list of changes as proposed by Richard Smith in
the mailing list.
See original comments with an impact on the future check state below:
[comments.begin
> + {"complex.h", "ccomplex"},
It'd be better to convert this one to <complex>, or leave it alone.
<ccomplex> is an unnecessary wart.
(The contents of C++11's <complex.h> / <ccomplex> / <complex> (all of
which are identical) aren't comparable to C99's <complex.h>, so if
this was C++98 code using the C99 header, the code will be broken with
or without this transformation.)
> + {"iso646.h", "ciso646"},
Just delete #includes of this one. <ciso646> does nothing.
> + {"stdalign.h", "cstdalign"},
> + {"stdbool.h", "cstdbool"},
We should just delete these two includes. These headers do nothing in C++.
comments.end]
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17990
llvm-svn: 278254
Summary:
D22566 will change RecursiveASTVisitor so that it descends into the initialization expressions for lambda captures.
modernize-loop-convert needs to be prepared for this so that it does not interpret these initialization expressions as invalid uses of the loop variable. The change has no ill effects without D22566 in place, i.e. the change does not depend on D22566.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22903
llvm-svn: 277339
Summary:
Previoly, the added test failed with the fillowing fixit:
char v[5];
- for(size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
+ for(char value : v)
{
- unsigned char value = v[i];
if (value > 127)
i.e. the variable 'value' changes from unsigned char to signed char. And
thus the following 'if' does not work anymore.
With this commit, the fixit is changed to:
char v[5];
- for(size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
+ for(unsigned char value : v)
{
- unsigned char value = v[i];
if (value > 127)
Reviewers: alexfh, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22069
llvm-svn: 276111
Summary: This is a fix for the new ExprWithCleanups introduced by clang's temporary variable lifetime marks change.
Reviewers: bkramer, sbenza, angelgarcia, alexth
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21243
llvm-svn: 273310
Summary:
By default, modernize-use-auto check will retain stars when replacing an explicit type with `auto`: `MyType *t = new MyType;` will be changed to `auto *t = new MyType;`, thus resulting in more consistency with the recommendations to use `auto *` for iterating over pointers in range-based for loops: http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#beware-unnecessary-copies-with-auto
The new `RemoveStars` option allows to revert to the old behavior: with the new option turned on the check will change `MyType *t = new MyType;` to `auto t = new MyType;`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sbenza
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20917
llvm-svn: 271739
Modified the clang-tidy PassByValue check. It now stops adding std::move to type which is trivially copyable because that caused the clang-tidy MoveConstArg to complain and revert, thus creating a cycle.
I have also added a lit-style test to verify the bugfix.
This is the bug on bugzilla: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27731
This is the code review on phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20365
llvm-svn: 270565