we can also fix the original header guard.
We still allow an _ at the end of a header guard since it's so common, but
remove it now when the #endif comment is changed.
llvm-svn: 216462
The implementation is split into a generic part and a LLVM-specific part.
Other codebases can implement it with their own style. The specific features
supported are:
- Verification (and fixing) of header guards against a style based on the file path
- Automatic insertion of header guards for headers that are missing them
- A warning when the header guard doesn't enable our fancy header guard optimization
(e.g. when there's an include preceeding the guard)
- Automatic insertion of a comment with the guard name after #endif.
For the LLVM style we disable #endif comments for now, they're not very common
in the codebase. We also only flag headers in the include directories, there
doesn't seem to be a common style outside.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4867
llvm-svn: 215548
After post-commit review and community discussion, this seems like a
reasonable direction to continue, making ownership semantics explicit in
the source using the type system.
llvm-svn: 215324
There are still a couple of rough edges in here but it is working fine
on LLVM and generates the same results as sort_includes.py if there are
no blank lines involved.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4741
llvm-svn: 215152
Summary:
Rename ChecksFilter to GlobList, as there's nothing specific to checks in it.
It's a rather generic way to represent sets of strings (or patterns), so it may
be used for something else in ClangTidy. The new name would not look strange
when used to filter other entities.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4806
llvm-svn: 214961
Haven't thought that I ever needed to do this, but in this case comparing the
index using pointer arithmetic turns out to be really ugly. It also generates
nasty sign-compare warnings on 32 bit targets.
llvm-svn: 214705
Summary:
This allows us to copy the parameter name from the definition (as a comment)
or insert /*unused*/ in both places.
Reviewers: alexfh, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4772
llvm-svn: 214701
Summary:
class Foo {
Foo() {
Foo(42); // oops
}
Foo(int);
};
This is valid code but it does nothing and we can't emit a warning in clang
because there might be side effects. The checker emits a warning for this
pattern and also for base class initializers written in this style.
There is some overlap with the unused-rtti checker but they follow different
goals and fire in different places most of the time.
Reviewers: alexfh, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4667
llvm-svn: 214397
It doesn't make sense to suggest 'virtual' as clang-tidy would complain
about that on the next iteration (we are never issuing warnings for the
base function).
llvm-svn: 214063
ASTMatchers currently have problems mixing bound TypeLoc nodes with Decl/Stmt
nodes. That should be fixed soon but for this checker there we only need the
TypeLoc to generate a fixit so postpone the potentially heavyweight AST walking
until after we know that we're going to emit a warning.
This is covered by existing test cases.
Original message:
[clang-tidy] Add a check for RAII temporaries.
This tries to find code similar that immediately destroys
an object that looks like it's trying to follow RAII.
{
scoped_lock(&global_mutex);
critical_section();
}
This checker will have false positives if someone uses this pattern
to legitimately invoke a destructor immediately (or the statement is
at the end of a scope anyway). To reduce the number we ignore this
pattern in macros (this is heavily used by gtest) and ignore objects
with no user-defined destructor.
llvm-svn: 213738
Summary:
This tries to find code similar that immediately destroys
an object that looks like it's trying to follow RAII.
{
scoped_lock(&global_mutex);
critical_section();
}
This checker will have false positives if someone uses this pattern
to legitimately invoke a destructor immediately (or the statement is
at the end of a scope anyway). To reduce the number we ignore this
pattern in macros (this is heavily used by gtest) and ignore objects
with no user-defined destructor.
Reviewers: alexfh, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4615
llvm-svn: 213647
This required a rather ugly workaround for a problem in ASTMatchers where
callee() is only overloaded for Stmt and Decl but not for Expr.
llvm-svn: 213509
This reverts commit r213308.
Reverting to have some on-list discussion/confirmation about the ongoing
direction of smart pointer usage in the LLVM project.
llvm-svn: 213324
If there's memset(x, y, 0) in the code it's most likely a mistake. The
checker suggests a fix-it to swap 'y' and '0'.
I think this has the potential to be promoted into a general clang warning
after some testing in clang-tidy.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4535
llvm-svn: 213155
This change contains of two checkers that warn about
1. anonymous namespaces in header files.
2. 'using namespace' directives everywhere.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4523
llvm-svn: 213153
Summary:
Those are considered unsafe and should be replaced with simple pointers or
full copies. It recognizes both std::string and ::string.
Reviewers: alexfh, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4522
llvm-svn: 213133
Summary:
We still allow the escape hatch foo(int /*x*/) and also suggest this
in a fixit. This is more powerful than the corresponding cpplint.py check
it also flags functions with multiple arguments as naming all arguments is
recommended by the google style guide.
Reviewers: alexfh, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4518
llvm-svn: 213075
Those may be incompatible with C++11 and are unnecessary. We suggest
removing the template arguments when they match the types of the make_pair
arguments or replace it with std::pair and explicit template arguments when
not.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4497
llvm-svn: 213058
This looks for swapped arguments by looking at implicit conversions of arguments
void Foo(int, double);
Foo(1.0, 3); // Most likely a bug
llvm-svn: 212942
Benjamin Kramer