formatting as any other diagnostic, they will be properly line wrapped and
otherwise pretty printed. Let's take advantage of that and the new factoring to
add some helpful information to them (much like template backtrace notes and
other notes): the name of the macro whose expansion is being noted. This makes
a world of difference if caret diagnostics are disabled, making the expansion
notes actually useful in this case. It also helps ensure that in edge cases the
information the user needs is present. Consider:
% nl -ba t5.cc
1 #define M(x, y, z) \
2 y
3
4 M(
5 1,
6 2,
7 3);
We now produce:
% ./bin/clang -fsyntax-only t5.cc
t5.cc:6:3: error: expected unqualified-id
2,
^
t5.cc:2:3: note: expanded from macro: M
y
^
1 error generated.
Without the added information in the note, the name of the macro being expanded
would never be shown.
This also deletes a FIXME to use the diagnostic formatting. It's not yet clear
to me that we *can* do this reasonably, and the production of this message was
my primary goal here anyways.
I'd love any comments or suggestions on improving these notes, their wording,
etc. Currently, I need to make them provide more helpful information in the
presence of a token-pasting buffer, and I'm pondering adding something along
the lines of "expanded from argument N of macro: ...".
llvm-svn: 142127
this long quest: actually use the note printing machinery for each macro
expansion note rather than a hacky version of it. This will colorize and
format the notes the same as any other. There is still some stuff to fix
here, but it's one step closer.
No test case changes because currently we don't do anything differently
that I can FileCheck for -- I don't really want to try matching the
color escape codes... Suggestions for how to test this are welcome. =]
llvm-svn: 142121
standing deficiency: we were providing no macro backtrace information
whenever caret diagnostics were turned off. This sinks the logic for
suppressing the code snippet and caret to the code that actually prints
tho code snippet and caret. Along the way, clean up the naming of
functions, remove some now fixed FIXMEs, and generally improve the
wording and logic of this process.
Add a test case exerecising this functionality. It is notable that the
resulting messages are extremely low quality. I'm working on a follow-up
patch that should address this and have left a FIXME in the test case.
llvm-svn: 142120
the SourceManager doesn't change, and the source files don't change.
This greatly simplifies the interfaces and interactions. The lifetime of
the TextDiagnostic object forms the 'session' over which we attempt to
condense and deduplicate information in diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 142104
been there. Also delete their redundant doxyments in favor of those in
the source file. I'm putting the doxyments for private and static
helpers into the implementation file, and only the public interface
doxyments into the header. If folks have strong opinions about this type
of split, feel free to chime in, I'm happy to re-organize.
llvm-svn: 142087
making it accessible to anyone from the Frontend library. Still a good
bit of cleanup to do here, but its a good milestone. This ensures that
*all* of the functionality needed to implement the DiagnosticConsumer is
exposed via the generic interface in some form. No sneaky re-use of
static functions.
llvm-svn: 142086
Chandler Carruth