This patch splits atomics out of the generic G_LOAD/G_STORE and into their own
G_ATOMIC_LOAD/G_ATOMIC_STORE. This is a pragmatic decision rather than a
necessary one. Atomic load/store has little in implementation in common with
non-atomic load/store. They tend to be handled very differently throughout the
backend. It also has the nice side-effect of slightly improving the common-case
performance at ISel since there's no longer a need for an atomicity check in the
matcher table.
All targets have been updated to remove the atomic load/store check from the
G_LOAD/G_STORE path. AArch64 has also been updated to mark
G_ATOMIC_LOAD/G_ATOMIC_STORE legal.
There is one issue with this patch though which also affects the extending loads
and truncating stores. The rules only match when an appropriate G_ANYEXT is
present in the MIR. For example,
(G_ATOMIC_STORE (G_TRUNC:s16 (G_ANYEXT:s32 (G_ATOMIC_LOAD:s16 X))))
will match but:
(G_ATOMIC_STORE (G_ATOMIC_LOAD:s16 X))
will not. This shouldn't be a problem at the moment, but as we get better at
eliminating extends/truncates we'll likely start failing to match in some
cases. The current plan is to fix this in a patch that changes the
representation of extending-load/truncating-store to allow the MMO to describe
a different type to the operation.
llvm-svn: 319691
This is causing a failure in the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win
buildbot, and I can't reproduce it locally, so reverting until I can work out
what is wrong.
llvm-svn: 319654
This adds a "invalid operands for instruction" diagnostic for
instructions where there is an instruction encoding with the correct
mnemonic and which is available for this target, but where multiple
operands do not match those which were provided. This makes it clear
that there is some combination of operands that is valid for the current
target, which the default diagnostic of "invalid instruction" does not.
Since this is a very general error, we only emit it if we don't have a
more specific error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36747
llvm-svn: 319649
GIM_CheckNonAtomic has been replaced by GIM_CheckAtomicOrdering to allow it to support a wider
range of orderings. This has then been used to import patterns using nodes such
as atomic_cmp_swap, atomic_swap, and atomic_load_*.
llvm-svn: 319232
RecordKeeper::getDef() is a hot place, it shows up in profiling
and it creates std::string instance for each search in RecordMap
though RecordKeeper::RecordMap can use StringRef as a key
instead to avoid that. Patch do that change.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40170
llvm-svn: 318822
When searching for a resource unit, use the reference location instead of
the definition location in case of an error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40263
llvm-svn: 318803
- We can still emit this error if the actual instruction has two or more
operands missing compared to the expected one.
- We should only emit this error once per instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36746
llvm-svn: 318770
This is NFC, as the matcher would continue looping up to the maximum
number of operands with no effect, but this should improve performance a
bit, and makes the debug trace clearer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36744
llvm-svn: 318769
Summary:
The generated diagnostic by the AsmMatcher isn't always applicable to the AsmOperand.
This is because the code will only update the diagnostic if it is more specific than the previous diagnostic. However, when having validated operands and 'moved on' to a next operand (for some instruction/alias for which all previous operands are valid), if the diagnostic is InvalidOperand, than that should be set as the diagnostic, not the more specific message about a previous operand for some other instruction/alias candidate.
Reviewers: craig.topper, olista01, rengolin, stoklund
Reviewed By: olista01
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40011
llvm-svn: 318759
Summary:
This patch fixes an issue so that the right alias is printed when the instruction has tied operands. It checks the number of operands in the resulting instruction as opposed to the alias, and then skips over tied operands that should not be printed in the alias.
This allows to generate the preferred assembly syntax for the AArch64 'ins' instruction, which should always be displayed as 'mov' according to the ARM Architecture Reference Manual. Several unit tests have changed as a result, but only to reflect the preferred disassembly. Some other InstAlias patterns (movk/bic/orr) needed a slight adjustment to stop them becoming the default and breaking other unit tests.
Please note that the patch is mostly the same as https://reviews.llvm.org/D29219 which was reverted because of an issue found when running TableGen with the Address Sanitizer. That issue has been addressed in this iteration of the patch.
Reviewers: rengolin, stoklund, huntergr, SjoerdMeijer, rovka
Reviewed By: rengolin, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: fhahn, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40030
llvm-svn: 318650
ptypeN is functionally the same as typeN except that it informs the
SelectionDAG importer that an operand should be treated as a pointer even
if it was written as iN. This is important for patterns that use iN instead
of iPTR to represent pointers. E.g.:
(set GPR64:$dst, (load GPR64:$addr))
Previously, this was handled as a hardcoded special case for the appropriate
operands to G_LOAD and G_STORE.
llvm-svn: 318574
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
Summary:
This patch adds a LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV which, like LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV,
causes TableGen to instrument the generated table to collect rule coverage
information. However, LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV goes a bit further than
LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV. The information is written to files
(${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gisel-coverage-* by default). These files can then be
concatenated into ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-all after which TableGen will
read this information and use it to emit warnings about untested rules.
This technique could also be used by SelectionDAG and can be further
extended to detect hot rules and give them priority over colder rules.
Usage:
* Enable LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV in CMake
* Build the compiler and run some tests
* cat gisel-coverage-[0-9]* > gisel-coverage-all
* Delete lib/Target/*/*GenGlobalISel.inc*
* Build the compiler
Known issues:
* ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-all must be generated as a manual
step due to a lack of a portable 'cat' command. It should be the
concatenation of all ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-[0-9]* files.
* There's no mechanism to discard coverage information when the ruleset
changes
Depends on D39742
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover, aditya_nandakumar, rovka
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: vsk, arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39747
llvm-svn: 318356
This is a tablegen backend to generate documentation for the opcodes that exist
for each target. For each opcode, it lists the assembly string, the names and
types of all operands, and the flags and predicates that apply to the opcode.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31025
llvm-svn: 318155
Similar to r315841, GlobalISel and SelectionDAG require different code for the
common atomic predicates due to differences in the representation.
Even without that, differences in the IR (SDNode vs MachineInstr) require
differences in the C++ predicate.
This patch moves the implementation of the common atomic predicates related to
ordering into tablegen so that it can handle these differences.
It's NFC for SelectionDAG since it emits equivalent code and it's NFC for
GlobalISel since the rules involving the relevant predicates are still
rejected by the importer.
llvm-svn: 318102
Similar to r315841, GlobalISel and SelectionDAG require different code for the
common atomic predicates due to differences in the representation.
Even without that, differences in the IR (SDNode vs MachineInstr) require
differences in the C++ predicate.
This patch moves the implementation of the common atomic predicates related to
memory type into tablegen so that it can handle these differences.
It's NFC for SelectionDAG since it emits equivalent code and it's NFC for
GlobalISel since the rules involving the relevant predicates are still
rejected by the importer.
llvm-svn: 318095
Some alias instructions are printed with an extra space after the tab
character. Fix this by skipping that space when the tab character is printed
so that the instructions are aligned with the rest of the code.
Patch by Milos Stojanovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35946
llvm-svn: 318059
Allow a pattern rewriter to be installed in CodeGenDAGPatterns and use it to
correct situations where SelectionDAG and GlobalISel disagree on
representation. For example, it would rewrite:
(sextload:i32 $ptr)<<unindexedload>><<sextload>><<sextloadi16>
to:
(sext:i32 (load:i16 $ptr)<<unindexedload>>)
I'd have preferred to replace the fragments and have the expansion happen
naturally as part of PatFrag expansion but the type inferencing system can't
cope with loads of types narrower than those mentioned in register classes.
This is because the SDTCisInt's on the sext constrain both the result and
operand to the 'legal' integer types (where legal is defined as 'a register
class can contain the type') which immediately rules the narrower types out.
Several targets (those with only one legal integer type) would then go on to
crash on the SDTCisOpSmallerThanOp<> when it removes all the possible types
for the result of the extend.
Also, improve isObviouslySafeToFold() slightly to automatically return true for
neighbouring instructions. There can't be any re-ordering problems if
re-ordering isn't happenning. We'll need to improve it further to handle
sign/zero-extending loads when the extend and load aren't immediate neighbours
though.
llvm-svn: 317971
This patch adds the ability to include the member function declarations
in the instruction selector class separately from the member bodies.
Defining GET_DAGISEL_DECL macro to any value will only include the member
declarations. To include bodies, define GET_DAGISEL_BODY macro to be the
selector class name. Example:
class FooDAGToDAGISel : public SelectionDAGISel {
// Pull in declarations only.
#define GET_DAGISEL_DECL
#include "FooISelDAGToDAG.inc"
};
// Include the function bodies (with names qualified with the provided
// class name).
#define GET_DAGISEL_BODY FooDAGToDAGISel
#include "FooISelDAGToDAG.inc"
When neither of the two macros are defined, the function bodies are emitted
inline (in the same way as before this patch).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39596
llvm-svn: 317903
Patch [1/5] in a series to add assembler/disassembler support for AArch64 SVE
unpredicated ADD/SUB instructions.
Patch by Sander De Smalen.
Reviewed by: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39087
llvm-svn: 317564
The GlobalISel TableGen backend didn't check for predicates on the
source children. This caused it to generate code for ARM patterns such
as SMLABB or similar, but without properly checking for the sext_16_node
part of the operands. This in turn meant that we would select SMLABB
instead of MLA for simple sequences such as s32 + s32 * s32, which is
wrong (we want a MLA on the full operands, not just their bottom 16
bits).
This patch forces TableGen to skip patterns with predicates on the src
children, so it doesn't generate code for SMLABB and other similar ARM
instructions at all anymore. AArch64 and X86 are not affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39554
llvm-svn: 317313
This will enable us to prefer VALIGND/Q during shuffle lowering in order to get the extended register encoding space when BWI isn't available. But if we end up not using the extended registers we can switch VPALIGNR for the shorter VEX encoding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39401
llvm-svn: 317122
The importer will now accept nested instructions in the result pattern such as
(ADDWrr $a, (SUBWrr $b, $c)). This is only valid when the nested instruction
def's a single vreg and the parent instruction consumes a single vreg where a
nested instruction is specified. The importer will automatically create a vreg
to connect the two using the type information from the pattern. This vreg will
be constrained to the register classes given in the instruction definitions*.
* REG_SEQUENCE is explicitly rejected because of this. The definition doesn't
constrain to a register class and it therefore needs special handling.
llvm-svn: 317117
The next commit will add support for multi-instruction emission so we need to
start allocating instruction ID's instead of hard-coding them to 0.
llvm-svn: 317057
Multi-instruction emission needs to ensure the the instructions are generated
a depth-first fashion. For example:
(ADDWrr (SUBWrr a, b), c)
needs to emit the SUBWrr before the ADDWrr. However, our walk over
TreePatternNode's is highly context sensitive which makes it difficult to append
BuildMIActions in the order we want. To fix this, we now keep track of the
insertion point as we add actions. This will allow multi-insn emission to insert
BuildMI's in the correct place.
The previous commit failed on the Ubuntu bots using GCC 4.8. These bots lack the
const_iterator forms of insert() and emplace() that were added in C++11. As a
result I've switched the const_iterators to iterators.
llvm-svn: 317049
The same bots fail but I believe I know what the issue is now. These bots are
missing the const_iterator versions of insert/emplace/etc. that were introduced
in C++11.
llvm-svn: 317042
Multi-instruction emission needs to ensure the the instructions are generated
a depth-first fashion. For example:
(ADDWrr (SUBWrr a, b), c)
needs to emit the SUBWrr before the ADDWrr. However, our walk over
TreePatternNode's is highly context sensitive which makes it difficult to append
BuildMIActions in the order we want. To fix this, we now keep track of the
insertion point as we add actions. This will allow multi-insn emission to insert
BuildMI's in the correct place.
The previous commit failed on the Ubuntu bots using GCC 4.8. These bots didn't
like a call to emplace(). I've replaced it with insert() to see if it's a quirk
of the C++11 support.
llvm-svn: 317040
Multi-instruction emission needs to ensure the the instructions are generated
a depth-first fashion. For example:
(ADDWrr (SUBWrr a, b), c)
needs to emit the SUBWrr before the ADDWrr. However, our walk over
TreePatternNode's is highly context sensitive which makes it difficult to append
BuildMIActions in the order we want. To fix this, we now keep track of the
insertion point as we add actions. This will allow multi-insn emission to insert
BuildMI's in the correct place.
llvm-svn: 317029
Multi-instruction emission will require that we have separate handling for
the defs between the implicitly created temporaries and the rule outputs.
The former require new temporary vregs while the latter should copy existing
operands. Factor out the implicit def/use renderers to minimize the code
duplication when we implement that.
llvm-svn: 317025
Prepare for multiple instruction emission by allowing BuildMIAction to
search for a suitable matcher that will support mutation.
This patch deliberately neglects to add matchers aside from the root to
preserve NFC. That said, it should be noted that until we support mutations
other than just the opcode the chances of finding a non-root instruction
for which canMutate() is true, is essentially zero. Furthermore in the
presence of multi-instruction emission the chances of finding any
instruction for which canMutate() is true is also zero. Nevertheless, we
can't continue to require that all BuildMIAction's consider the root of the match
to be recyclable due to the risk of recycling it twice in the same rule.
llvm-svn: 317022
When multi-instruction emission is supported, it will no longer be guaranteed
that every BuildMIAction has a corresponding matched instruction. BuildMIAction
should support not having one to cover the case where a rule produces more
instructions than it matched.
llvm-svn: 316463
Daniel Sanders