Summary:
This enables clangd to intercept compiler diagnostics and attach fixes (e.g. by
querying index). This patch adds missing includes for incomplete types e.g.
member access into class with only forward declaration. This would allow adding
missing includes for user-typed symbol names that are missing declarations
(e.g. typos) in the future.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56903
llvm-svn: 352361
Summary:
Because _Float16 was disabled for X86 targets the unit-tests started failing.
Extract the pieces for _Float16 and run theses tests under AArch64.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: javed.absar, xazax.hun, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57249
llvm-svn: 352231
Summary:
Clear the cached file statuses, otherwise we will leave some garbage texts on
the status bar when clangd crashes.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56540
llvm-svn: 352049
Seems the previous statement does not hold up anymore.
Reviewers: steveire
Reviewed By: steveire
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57102
llvm-svn: 352031
With ObjCPropertyDecl, ASTNode.OrigD can be a ObjCPropertyImplDecl
which is not a NamedDecl, leading to a crash since the code
incorrectly assumes ASTNode.OrigD will always be a NamedDecl.
Change by dgoldman (David Goldman)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56916
llvm-svn: 351941
Summary:
The `Acronyms` and `IncludeDefaultAcronyms` options were deprecated in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51832. These options can be removed.
Tested by running the clang-tidy tests.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56945
llvm-svn: 351921
ClangTidyOptions::getDefaults is not free, it will initialize all
clang-tidy modules to get check-specific options, and we don't use this
information in CodeComplete, so using an empty one (constructed by
default constructor) is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 351826
Summary:
This patch adds some basic supports for clang-tidy configurations in clangd:
- clangd will respect .clang-tidy configurations for each file
- we don't aim to support all clang-tidy options in clangd, only a
small subset of condfigurations (options related to which checks will be
enabled) are supported.
- add a `clang-tidy-checks` CLI option that can override options from
.clang-tidy file
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55256
llvm-svn: 351792
Summary:
Some projects make use of clang plugins when building, but clangd is
not aware of those plugins therefore can't work with the same compile command
arguments.
There were multiple places clangd performed commandline manipulations,
this one also moves them all into OverlayCDB.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, sammccall, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56841
llvm-svn: 351788
The readability-else-after-return check should be smarter about cases where the
variable defined in the condition is used in the `else` branch. This patch makes
it just ignore such cases, but alternative solutions may be better (added a
FIXME).
llvm-svn: 351751
Summary: See rC351531 for the introduction of getStripPluginsAdjuster.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56902
llvm-svn: 351738
all missed!
Thanks to Alex Bradbury for pointing this out, and the fact that I never
added the intended `legacy` anchor to the developer policy. Add that
anchor too. With hope, this will cause the links to all resolve
successfully.
llvm-svn: 351731
Otherwise we don't warn on a struct containing a single public int, but
we warn on a struct containing a single public std::string, which is
inconsistent.
llvm-svn: 351686
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
a stray single '\r' from one file. These are the last line ending issues
I can find in the files containing parts of LLVM's file headers.
llvm-svn: 351634
endings. We already used them in some cases, and this makes things
consistent. This will also simplify updating the licenses in these
files.
llvm-svn: 351632
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
Summary:
The underlying issue is fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
and this test ensures the issue does not creep back into our
code-base.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein, hwright
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56918
llvm-svn: 351569
Summary:
It is producing too much input in non-verbose mode,
i.e. a message per indexed file
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56915
llvm-svn: 351563
Haojian Wu