As part of PR22777, fix testcases that fail the debug info verifier.
The changes fall into the following categories:
- Empty `filename:` fields in `MDFile`s. Compile units and some types
require non-empty filenames. A number of testcases have empty
filenames, probably due to hand-reduction of testcases.
- Not-quite empty arrays: `!{i32 0}`. This used to be equivalent in
the debug info schema to `!{}`. They cause problems for
`!MDSubroutineType`'s `types:` array, since it requires all operands
to be valid types. (Note that `!{null}` is the correct type array
for functions that take no arguments and return `void`.)
- Significantly bitrotted testcases. Nodes got left behind a few
upgrades ago because of missing or invalid tags.
llvm-svn: 232415
Now that we check `MDExpression` during `-verify` (r232299), make
the `DIExpression` wrapper more strict:
- remove redundant checks in `DebugInfoVerifier`,
- overload `get()` to `cast_or_null<MDExpression>` (superseding
`getRaw()`),
- stop checking for null in any accessor, and
- remove `DIExpression::Verify()` entirely in favour of
`MDExpression::isValid()`.
There is still some logic in this class, mostly to do with high-level
iterators; I'll defer cleaning up those until the rest of the wrappers
are similarly strict.
llvm-svn: 232412
Clarify the logic in `DIType::Verify()` by checking `isBasicType()`
earlier, by skipping `else` after `return`s, and by documenting an
otherwise opaque check.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 232410
Turns out `visitIntrinsicFunctionCall()` descends into all operands
already, so explicitly descending in `visitDbgIntrinsic()` (part of
r232296) isn't useful.
Updating a testcase that doesn't really need `-verify-debug-info` (since
r231082) as confirmation.
llvm-svn: 232408
r230877 optimized which fields are written out for `CHECK`-ability, but
apparently missed changing some of them to optional in `LLParser`.
Fixes PR22921.
llvm-svn: 232400
are not at the file level.
Previously, the default subtarget created from the target triple was used to
emit inline asm instructions. Compilation would fail in cases where the feature
bits necessary to assemble an inline asm instruction in a function weren't set.
llvm-svn: 232392
Fix justify error for small structures bigger than 32 bits in fixed
arguments for MIPS64 big endian. There was a problem when small structures
are passed as fixed arguments. The structures that are bigger than 32 bits
but smaller than 64 bits were not left justified properly on MIPS64 big
endian. This is fixed by shifting the value to make it left justified when
appropriate.
Patch by Aleksandar Beserminji.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8174
llvm-svn: 232382
Summary:
But still handle them the same way since I don't know how they differ on
this target.
No functional change intended.
Reviewers: kparzysz, adasgupt
Reviewed By: kparzysz, adasgupt
Subscribers: colinl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8204
llvm-svn: 232374
Summary:
This is instead of doing this in target independent code and is the last
non-functional change before targets begin to distinguish between
different memory constraints when selecting code for the ISD::INLINEASM
node.
Next, each target will individually move away from the idea that all
memory constraints behave like 'm'.
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8173
llvm-svn: 232373
This still doesn't actually work correctly for big endian input files,
but since these tests all use little endian input files they don't
actually fail. I'll be committing a real fix for big endian soon, but
I don't have proper tests for it yet.
llvm-svn: 232354
The problem here is the infamous one direction known safe. I was
hesitant to turn it off before b/c of the potential for regressions
without an actual bug from users hitting the problem. This is that bug ;
).
The main performance impact of having known safe in both directions is
that often times it is very difficult to find two releases without a use
in-between them since we are so conservative with determining potential
uses. The one direction known safe gets around that problem by taking
advantage of many situations where we have two retains in a row,
allowing us to avoid that problem. That being said, the one direction
known safe is unsafe. Consider the following situation:
retain(x)
retain(x)
call(x)
call(x)
release(x)
Then we know the following about the reference count of x:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+2
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1 (since we can not release a deallocated pointer).
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 0
That is all the information that we can know statically. That means that
we know that A(x), B(x) together can release (x) at most N+1 times. Lets
say that we remove the inner retain, release pair.
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 0
We knew before that A(x), B(x) could release x up to N+1 times meaning
that rc(x) may be zero at the release(x). That is not safe. On the other
hand, consider the following situation where we have a must use of
release(x) that x must be kept alive for after the release(x)**. Then we
know that:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+2
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 2 (since we know that we are going to release x and that that release can not be the last use of x).
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 1 (since we can not deallocate the pointer since we have a must use after x).
…
// rc(x) >= 1
use(x)
Thus we know that statically the calls to A(x), B(x) can together only
release rc(x) N times. Thus if we remove the inner retain, release pair:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1
…
// rc(x) >= 1
use(x)
We are still safe unless in the final … there are unbalanced retains,
releases which would have caused the program to blow up anyways even
before optimization occurred. The simplest form of must use is an
additional release that has not been paired up with any retain (if we
had paired the release with a retain and removed it we would not have
the additional use). This fits nicely into the ARC framework since
basically what you do is say that given any nested releases regardless
of what is in between, the inner release is known safe. This enables us to get
back the lost performance.
<rdar://problem/19023795>
llvm-svn: 232351
This code was casting regions of a memory buffer to a couple of
different structs. This is wrong in a few ways:
1. It breaks aliasing rules.
2. If the buffer isn't aligned, it hits undefined behaviour.
3. It completely ignores endianness differences.
4. The structs being defined for this aren't specifying their padding
properly, so this doesn't even represent the data properly on some
platforms.
This commit is mostly NFC, except that it fixes reading coverage for
32 bit binaries as a side effect of getting rid of the mispadded
structs. I've included a test for that.
I've also baked in that we only handle little endian more explicitly,
since that was true in practice already. I'll fix this to handle
endianness properly in a followup commit.
llvm-svn: 232346
The information gathering part of the patch stores a bit more information
than what is strictly necessary for these 2 sections. The rest will
become useful when we start emitting __apple_* type accelerator tables.
llvm-svn: 232342
Also, after looking at the raw_svector_stream internals, increase the
size of the SmallString used with it to prevent heap allocation.
Issue found by the Asan bot.
llvm-svn: 232335
After much bike shed discussions, we seem to agree to a few loose
but relevant guidelines on how to prepare a commit message. It also
points the attribution section to the new commit messages section
to deduplicate information.
llvm-svn: 232334
This code comes with a lot of cruft that is meant to mimic darwin's
dsymutil behavior. A much simpler approach (described in the numerous
FIXMEs that I put in there) gives the right output for the vast
majority of cases. The extra corner cases that are handled differently
need to be investigated: they seem to correctly handle debug info that
is in the input, but that info looks suspicious in the first place.
Anyway, the current code needs to handle this, but I plan to revisit it
as soon as the big round of validation against the classic dsymutil is
over.
llvm-svn: 232333
No need to emit a DW_LNS_advance_pc with a 0 increment. Found out while
comparing dsymutil's and LLVM's line table encoding. Not a correctenss
fix, just a small encoding size optimization.
I'm not sure how to generate a sequence that triggers this, and moreover
llvm-dwardump doesn't dump the line table program, thus the effort
involved in creating a testcase for this trivial patch seemed out of
proportion.
llvm-svn: 232332
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith