r296992 made ScalarEvolution's CompareValueComplexity less aggressive,
and that broke the polly test being fixed in this change. This change
explicitly bumps CompareValueComplexity in said test case to make it
pass.
Can someone from the polly team please can give me an idea on if this
case is important enough to have
scalar-evolution-max-value-compare-depth be 3 by default?
llvm-svn: 296994
Update test after commit r284501:
[SCEV] Make CompareValueComplexity a little bit smarter
Contributed-by: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>
llvm-svn: 284543
This will make it easier to switch the default of Polly's invariant load
hoisting strategy and also makes it very clear that these test cases
indeed require invariant code hoisting to work.
llvm-svn: 278667
Sorting is replaced by a demand driven code generation that will pre-load a
value when it is needed or, if it was not needed before, at some point
determined by the order of invariant accesses in the program. Only in very
little cases this demand driven pre-loading will kick in, though it will
prevent us from generating faulty code. An example where it is needed is
shown in:
test/ScopInfo/invariant_loads_complicated_dependences.ll
Invariant loads that appear in parameters but are not on the top-level (e.g.,
the parameter is not a SCEVUnknown) will now be treated correctly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13831
llvm-svn: 250655
Sanjoy Das