This patch updates algorithms in <numeric> to use std::move
based on p0616r0. Moving values instead of copying them
creates huge speed improvements (see the paper for details).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61170
Implements P1956: On the names of low-level bit manipulation functions.
Users may use older versions of libc++ or other standard libraries with the old names. In order to keep compatibility the old functions are kept, but marked as deprecated.
The patch also adds a new config macro `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_MSG`. Do you prefer a this is a separate patch?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90551
This patch changes how linear_congruential_engine picks its randomization
algorithm. It adds two restrictions, `_OverflowOK` and `_SchrageOK`.
`_OverflowOK` means that m is a power of two so using the classic
`(a * x + c) % m` will create a meaningless overflow. The second checks
that Schrage's algorithm will produce results that are in bounds of min
and max. This patch fixes https://llvm.org/PR27839.
Differential Revision: D65041
The strings were concatenated together without adding spaces between
numbers, which lead to numbers that wouldn't fit in an unsigned int.
Thanks to Casey Carter for the find.
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
When porting libc++ to embedded systems, it can be useful to drop support
for localization, which these systems don't implement or care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90072
Some platforms, like several embedded platforms, do not provide a source
of randomness through a random device. This commit makes it possible to
build and test libc++ for such platforms, i.e. without std::random_device.
Surprisingly, the only functionality that doesn't work on such platforms
is std::random_device itself -- everything else in <random> still works,
one just has to find alternative ways to seed the PRNGs.
We used <iostream> in several places where we don't actually need the
full power of <iostream>, and where using basic `std::printf` is enough.
This is better, since `std::printf` can be supported on systems that don't
have a notion of locales, while <iostream> can't.
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
Similar to <concepts>, we need to protect the header and test against
inclusion and being run if concepts aren't supported by the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82171
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Summary: Update status page and test synopsis. Add synopsis in <cmath>.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80456
The ostream operator<< is currently broken for std::complex with
specified field widths.
This patch a partial revert of c3478eff7a (reviewed as D71214),
restoring the correct behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78816
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
The current implementation of binomial_distribution is not guaranteed to
converge for certain extreme configurations of the engine and distribution.
This is due to a mistake in the implementation of the algorithm from the
given reference paper. The algorithm in the paper is guaranteed to
terminate but has redundant statements. The current implementation
simplified away the redundancy into a while loop, but it excludes the
return condition of the case where a good sample cannot be returned for
the particular sample being used from the uniform distribution, which is
what causes the infinite loop. This change guarantees termination by
recognizing that a good sample cannot be returned and returning 0 after
breaking the loop. This is also in contrast to the paper because the
return value as specified in the paper violates basic checks in at least
a subset of the extreme cases where the current implementation fails to
terminate. This default return value of 0 is satisfactory for the
extreme case known so far.
Since this is only meant to affect extreme cases where the algorithm
does not terminate anyways, the behavior is expected to remain exactly
the same for all non-extreme cases that have been terminating so far.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR44847
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74997
There are some unnecessary typenames in std/numerics/c.math/abs.pass.cpp;
e.g. they're not in a dependent context.
Patch by Bryce Adelstein Lelbach
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72106
[libcxx] [test] Calling min and max on an empty valarray is UB.
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/min.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/max.pass.cpp
The calls `v1.min();` and `v1.max();` were emitting nodiscard warnings
with MSVC's STL. Upon closer inspection, these calls were triggering
undefined behavior. N4842 [valarray.members] says:
"T min() const;
8 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true.
T max() const;
10 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true."
As these tests already provide coverage for non-empty valarrays
(immediately above), I've simply deleted the code for empty valarrays.
[libcxx] [test] Add macros to msvc_stdlib_force_include.h (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.h
These macros are being used by:
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
Defining them to nothing allows that test to pass.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C5063 for is_constant_evaluated (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.const.eval/is_constant_evaluated.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing code that MSVC intentionally warns
about, so the warning should be silenced.
Additionally, comment an endif for clarity.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C4127 (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/charconv_test_helpers.h
MSVC avoids emitting this warning when it sees a single constexpr value
being tested, but this condition is a mix of compile-time and run-time.
Using push-disable-pop is the least intrusive way to silence this.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC truncation warning (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/construct_iter_iter.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally truncating float to int, which MSVC
intentionally warns about, so push-disable-pop is necessary.
[libcxx] [test] Avoid truncation warnings in erase_if tests (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/map/map.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.map/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multimap/erase_if.pass.cpp
These tests use maps with `short` keys and values, emitting MSVC
truncation warnings from `int`. Adding `static_cast` to `key_type`
and `mapped_type` avoids these warnings.
As these tests require C++20 mode (or newer), for brevity I've changed
the multimap tests to use emplace to initialize the test data.
This has no effect on the erase_if testing.
* Silence unused-local-typedef warnings: `map.cons/assign_initializer_list.pass.cpp` (and the `set.cons` variant) uses a local typedef only within `LIBCPP_ASSERT`s, so clang diagnoses it as unused when testing non-libc++.
* Add missing include: `c.math/abs.pass.cpp` uses `std::numeric_limits` but failed to `#include <limits>`.
* Don't test non-type: A "recent" change to `meta.trans.other/underlying_type.pass.cpp` unconditionally tests the type `F` which is conditionally defined.
* Use `hash<long long>` instead of `hash<short>` with `int` in `unordered_meow` deduction guide tests to avoid truncation warnings.
* Convert `3.14` explicitly in `midpoint.float.pass` since MSVC incorrectly diagnoses `float meow = 3.14;` as truncating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68681
llvm-svn: 374248
In r369429, I hoisted a floating point computation to a variable in order
to remove a warning. However, it turns out this doesn't play well with
floating point arithmetic. This commit reverts r369429 and instead casts
the result of the floating point computation to remove the warning.
Whether hoisting the computaiton to a variable should give the same
result can be investigated independently.
llvm-svn: 369693
On systems where sizeof(long) == sizeof(int)
the current tests failed. This commit updates
those tests to work on all systems.
std::abs has specific long specializations
which can be used instead.
llvm-svn: 369437
By stashing the computation of `E::max() - E::min()` in a variable, we
avoid the warning introduced in r367497. Note that we use `auto` to
avoid having to deduce the type of the computation, which is not a
problem since Clang provides `auto` as an extension even in C++03 (and
we disable warnings related to using C++11 extensions in the test suite).
llvm-svn: 369429
Richard Smith