These were disabled in 473a3a773e
because they failed on 32 bit platforms. (Arm for sure but I assume
any 32 bit)
This was due to the printf formatter used. These assumed
that types like uint64_t/size_t would be certain size/type and
that changes on 32 bit.
Instead use "z" to print the size_t and PRI<...> formatters
for the addr_t (always uint64_t) and the int32_t.
This new command looks much like "memory read"
and mirrors its basic behaviour.
(lldb) memory tag read new_buf_ptr new_buf_ptr+32
Logical tag: 0x9
Allocation tags:
[0x900fffff7ffa000, 0x900fffff7ffa010): 0x9
[0x900fffff7ffa010, 0x900fffff7ffa020): 0x0
Important proprties:
* The end address is optional and defaults to reading
1 tag if ommitted
* It is an error to try to read tags if the architecture
or process doesn't support it, or if the range asked
for is not tagged.
* It is an error to read an inverted range (end < begin)
(logical tags are removed for this check so you can
pass tagged addresses here)
* The range will be expanded to fit the tagging granule,
so you can get more tags than simply (end-begin)/granule size.
Whatever you get back will always cover the original range.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97285
This adds GDB client support for the qMemTags packet
which reads memory tags. Following the design
which was recently committed to GDB.
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/General-Query-Packets.html#General-Query-Packets
(look for qMemTags)
lldb commands will use the new Process methods
GetMemoryTagManager and ReadMemoryTags.
The former takes a range and checks that:
* The current process architecture has an architecture plugin
* That plugin provides a MemoryTagManager
* That the range of memory requested lies in a tagged range
(it will expand it to granules for you)
If all that was true you get a MemoryTagManager you
can give to ReadMemoryTags.
This two step process is done to allow commands to get the
tag manager without having to read tags as well. For example
you might just want to remove a logical tag, or error early
if a range with tagged addresses is inverted.
Note that getting a MemoryTagManager doesn't mean that the process
or a specific memory range is tagged. Those are seperate checks.
Having a tag manager just means this architecture *could* have
a tagging feature enabled.
An architecture plugin has been added for AArch64 which
will return a MemoryTagManagerAArch64MTE, which was added in a
previous patch.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95602
This adds memory tag reading using the new "qMemTags"
packet and ptrace on AArch64 Linux.
This new packet is following the one used by GDB.
(https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/General-Query-Packets.html)
On AArch64 Linux we use ptrace's PEEKMTETAGS to read
tags and we assume that lldb has already checked that the
memory region actually has tagging enabled.
We do not assume that lldb has expanded the requested range
to granules and expand it again to be sure.
(although lldb will be sending aligned ranges because it happens
to need them client side anyway)
Also we don't assume untagged addresses. So for AArch64 we'll
remove the top byte before using them. (the top byte includes
MTE and other non address data)
To do the ptrace read NativeProcessLinux will ask the native
register context for a memory tag manager based on the
type in the packet. This also gives you the ptrace numbers you need.
(it's called a register context but it also has non register data,
so it saves adding another per platform sub class)
The only supported platform for this is AArch64 Linux and the only
supported tag type is MTE allocation tags. Anything else will
error.
Ptrace can return a partial result but for lldb-server we will
be treating that as an error. To succeed we need to get all the tags
we expect.
(Note that the protocol leaves room for logical tags to be
read via qMemTags but this is not going to be implemented for lldb
at this time.)
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95601
This feature "memory-tagging+" indicates that lldb-server
supports memory tagging packets. (added in a later patch)
We check HWCAP2_MTE to decide whether to enable this
feature for Linux.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97282
This adds the MemoryTagManager class and a specialisation
of that class for AArch64 MTE tags. It provides a generic
interface for various tagging operations.
Adding/removing tags, diffing tagged pointers, etc.
Later patches will use this manager to handle memory tags
in generic code in both lldb and lldb-server.
Since it will be used in both, the base class header is in
lldb/Target.
(MemoryRegionInfo is another example of this pattern)
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97281
As a follow up of D103588, I'm reinitiating the discussion with a new proposal for traversing instructions in a trace which uses the feedback gotten in that diff.
See the embedded documentation in TraceCursor for more information. The idea is to offer an OOP way to traverse instructions exposing a minimal interface that makes no assumptions on:
- the number of instructions in the trace (i.e. having indices for instructions might be impractical for gigantic intel-pt traces, as it would require to decode the entire trace). This renders the use of indices to point to instructions impractical. Traces are big and expensive, and the consumer should try to do look linear lookups (forwards and/or backwards) and avoid random accesses (the API could be extended though, but for now I want to dicard that funcionality and leave the API extensible if needed).
- the way the instructions are represented internally by each Trace plug-in. They could be mmap'ed from a file, exist in plain vector or generated on the fly as the user requests the data.
- the actual data structure used internally for each plug-in. Ideas like having a struct TraceInstruction have been discarded because that would make the plug-in follow a certain data type, which might be costly. Instead, the user can ask the cursor for each independent property of the instruction it's pointing at.
The way to get a cursor is to ask Trace.h for the end or being cursor or a thread's trace.
There are some benefits of this approach:
- there's little cost to create a cursor, and this allows for lazily decoding a trace as the user requests data.
- each trace plug-in could decide how to cache the instructions it generates. For example, if a trace is small, it might decide to keep everything in memory, or if the trace is massive, it might decide to keep around the last thousands of instructions to speed up local searches.
- a cursor can outlive a stop point, which makes trace comparison for live processes feasible. An application of this is to compare profiling data of two runs of the same function, which should be doable with intel pt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104422
We can extend/modify `GetMethodNameVariants` to suit our purposes here.
What symtab is looking for is alternate names we may want to use to
search for a specific symbol, and asking for variants of a name makes
the most sense here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104067
I added asserts to these in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104525.
They are available (directly or otherwise) via the API so we
should not assert.
Restore the previous behaviour. If the message
is empty, we return early before printing anything.
For SetError don't assert that the error is a failure.
The remaining assert is in AppendRawError which
is not part of the API.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104778
Replacing existing uses with AppendError.
SetError is also part of the SBI API. This remains
but instead of calling the underlying SetError it
will call AppendError.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104768
Mostly by converting uses of GetErrorStream to AppendError,
so that the call to SetStatus is implicit.
Some remain where it isn't certain that you'll have a message
to set, or you want the output to be on stdout.
One place in CommandObjectWatchpoint previously didn't set
the status to failed at all. However it's pretty obvious
that it should do so.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104697
We should *never* use static local variables in this file as this makes
unittesting the plugin code impossible (and this whole 'testing' thing has
turned out to be rather useful so far).
LLDB supports having globbing regexes in the process launch arguments that will
be resolved using the user's shell. This requires that we pass the launch args
to the shell and then read back the expanded arguments using LLDB's argdumper
utility.
As the shell will not just expand the globbing regexes but all special
characters, we need to escape all non-globbing charcters such as $, &, <, >,
etc. as those otherwise are interpreted and removed in the step where we expand
the globbing characters. Also because the special characters are shell-specific,
LLDB needs to maintain a list of all the characters that need to be escaped for
each specific shell.
This patch adds the list of special characters that need to be escaped for
`zsh`. Without this patch on systems where `zsh` is the user's shell (like on
all macOS systems) having any of these special characters in your arguments or
path to the binary will cause the process launch to fail. E.g., `lldb -- ./calc
1<2` is failing without this patch. The same happens if the absolute path to
`calc` is in a directory that contains for example parentheses or other special
characters.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104627
Rust's v0 name mangling scheme [1] is easy to disambiguate from other
name mangling schemes because symbols always start with `_R`. The llvm
Demangle library supports demangling the Rust v0 scheme. Use it to
demangle Rust symbols.
Added unit tests that check simple symbols. Ran LLDB built with this
patch to debug some Rust programs compiled with the v0 name mangling
scheme. Confirmed symbol names were demangled as expected.
Note: enabling the new name mangling scheme requires a nightly
toolchain:
```
$ cat main.rs
fn main() {
println!("Hello world!");
}
$ $(rustup which --toolchain nightly rustc) -Z symbol-mangling-version=v0 main.rs -g
$ /home/asm/hacking/llvm/build/bin/lldb ./main --one-line 'b main.rs:2'
(lldb) target create "./main"
Current executable set to '/home/asm/hacking/llvm/rust/main' (x86_64).
(lldb) b main.rs:2
Breakpoint 1: where = main`main::main + 4 at main.rs:2:5, address = 0x00000000000076a4
(lldb) r
Process 948449 launched: '/home/asm/hacking/llvm/rust/main' (x86_64)
warning: (x86_64) /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 No LZMA support found for reading .gnu_debugdata section
Process 948449 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
frame #0: 0x000055555555b6a4 main`main::main at main.rs:2:5
1 fn main() {
-> 2 println!("Hello world!");
3 }
(lldb) bt
error: need to add support for DW_TAG_base_type '()' encoded with DW_ATE = 0x7, bit_size = 0
* thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x000055555555b6a4 main`main::main at main.rs:2:5
frame #1: 0x000055555555b78b main`<fn() as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once((null)=(main`main::main at main.rs:1), (null)=<unavailable>) at function.rs:227:5
frame #2: 0x000055555555b66e main`std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn(), ()>(f=(main`main::main at main.rs:1)) at backtrace.rs:125:18
frame #3: 0x000055555555b851 main`std::rt::lang_start::<()>::{closure#0} at rt.rs:49:18
frame #4: 0x000055555556c9f9 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] core::ops::function::impls::_$LT$impl$u20$core..ops..function..FnOnce$LT$A$GT$$u20$for$u20$$RF$F$GT$::call_once::h04259e4a34d07c2f at function.rs:259:13
frame #5: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] std::panicking::try::do_call::hb8da45704d5cfbbf at panicking.rs:401:40
frame #6: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] std::panicking::try::h4beadc19a78fec52 at panicking.rs:365:19
frame #7: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] std::panic::catch_unwind::hc58016cd36ba81a4 at panic.rs:433:14
frame #8: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a at rt.rs:34:21
frame #9: 0x000055555555b830 main`std::rt::lang_start::<()>(main=(main`main::main at main.rs:1), argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffcb18) at rt.rs:48:5
frame #10: 0x000055555555b6fc main`main + 28
frame #11: 0x00007ffff73f2493 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243
frame #12: 0x000055555555b59e main`_start + 46
(lldb)
```
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60705
Reviewed By: clayborg, teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
The intention is now that AppendError/SetError/AppendRawError only
be called with some message to show. This enforces that.
For SetError with a Status and a fallback string first assert
that the Status is a failure Status. Then it calls SetError(StringRef)
which checks the message is valid. (which could be the fallback
or the Status')
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104525
Add a new feature to process save-core on Darwin systems -- for
lldb to create a user process corefile with only the dirty (modified
memory) pages included. All of the binaries that were used in the
corefile are assumed to still exist on the system for the duration
of the use of the corefile. A new --style option to process save-core
is added, so a full corefile can be requested if portability across
systems, or across time, is needed for this corefile.
debugserver can now identify the dirty pages in a memory region
when queried with qMemoryRegionInfo, and the size of vm pages is
given in qHostInfo.
Create a new "all image infos" LC_NOTE for Mach-O which allows us
to describe all of the binaries that were loaded in the process --
load address, UUID, file path, segment load addresses, and optionally
whether code from the binary was executing on any thread. The old
"read dyld_all_image_infos and then the in-memory Mach-O load
commands to get segment load addresses" no longer works when we
only have dirty memory.
rdar://69670807
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387
Add support for extracting basic data from NetBSD/i386 core dumps.
FPU registers are not supported at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101091
This adds a basic SB API for creating and stopping traces.
Note: This doesn't add any APIs for inspecting individual instructions. That'd be a more complicated change and it might be better to enhande the dump functionality to output the data in binary format. I'll leave that for a later diff.
This also enhances the existing tests so that they test the same flow using both the command interface and the SB API.
I also did some cleanup of legacy code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103500
This is part 2, covering the commands source.
Some uses remain where it's tricky to see what the
logic is or they are not used with AppendError.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104448
Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D103701 AppendError<...>
sets this for you.
This change includes all of the non-command uses.
Some uses remain where it's either tricky to reason about
the logic, or they aren't paired with AppendError calls.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104379
The idea is now that AppendError<...> will set eReturnStatusFailed
for you so you don't have to call SetStatus again.
Previously if the error message was empty, the status wouldn't
be set.
I don't think there are any sitautions where the message is in
fact empty but it potentially could be depending on where
we get the string from.
So let's set the status up front then return early if the message is empty.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104380
when dealing with -gmodules debug info.
This fixes the bot failures on Darwin.
A recent clang change (presumably https://reviews.llvm.org/D104291)
introduced a bug where .pcm files would identify themselves as
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus, but the .o that references them would identify as
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14. While that bug needs to be fixed, too, it
shows that the current strict comparison also isn't meaningful.
rdar://79423225
`vwprintw` is (in theory) using the `arargs.h` va_list while `vw_printw` is
using the `stdarg.h` va_list. It seems these days they can be used
interchangeably but `vwprintw` is marked as deprecated.
This is an NFC cleanup.
Many of the API's that returned BreakpointOptions always returned valid ones.
Internally the BreakpointLocations usually have null BreakpointOptions, since they
use their owner's options until an option is set specifically on the location.
So the original code used pointers & unique_ptr everywhere for consistency.
But that made the code hard to reason about from the outside.
This patch changes the code so that everywhere an API is guaranteed to
return a non-null BreakpointOption, it returns it as a reference to make
that clear.
It also changes the Breakpoint to hold a BreakpointOption
member where it previously had a UP. Since we were always filling the UP
in the Breakpoint constructor, having the UP wasn't helping anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104162
This patch builds on D100521 and other related patches to add support
for unwinding stack on AArch64 systems with pointer authentication
feature enabled.
We override FixCodeAddress and FixDataAddress function in ABISysV_arm64
class. We now try to calculate and set code and data masks after reading
data_mask and code_mask registers exposed by AArch64 targets running Linux.
This patch utilizes core file linux-aarch64-pac.core for testing that
LLDB can successfully unwind stack frames in the presence of signed
return address after masking off ignored bits.
This patch also includes a AArch64 Linux native test case to demonstrate
successful back trace calculation in presence of pointer authentication
feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99944
DWARF doesn't describe templates itself but only actual template instantiations.
Because of that LLDB has to infer the parameters of the class template
declarations from the actual instantiations when creating the internal Clang AST
from debug info
Because there is no dedicated DIE for the class template, LLDB also creates the
`ClassTemplateDecl` implicitly when parsing a template instantiation. To avoid
creating one ClassTemplateDecls for every instantiation,
`TypeSystemClang::CreateClassTemplateDecl` will check if there is already a
`ClassTemplateDecl` in the requested `DeclContext` and will reuse a found
fitting declaration.
The logic that checks if a found class template fits to an instantiation is
currently just comparing the name of the template. So right now we map
`template<typename T> struct S;` to an instantiation with the values `S<1, 2,
3>` even though they clearly don't belong together.
This causes crashes later on when for example the Itanium mangler's
`TemplateArgManglingInfo::needExactType` method tries to find fitting the class
template parameter that fits to an instantiation value. In the example above it
will try to find the parameter for the value `2` but will just trigger a
boundary check when retrieving the parameter with index 1 from the class
template.
There are two ways we can end up with an instantiation that doesn't fit to a
class template with the same name:
1. We have two TUs with two templates that have the same name and internal
linkage.
2. A forward declared template instantiation is emitted by GCC and Clang
without an empty list of parameter values.
This patch makes the check for whether a class template declaration can be
reused more sophisticated by also comparing whether the parameter values can fit
to the found class template. If we can't find a fitting class template we
justcreate a second class template with the fitting parameters.
Fixes rdar://76592821
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100662
libstdc++ since version 11 has a conditional compilation based on
[[no_unique_address]] availability whether one element is either
inherited or put there as a field with [[no_unique_address]].
The code comment is by teemperor.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104283
One nice feature of the os_signpost API is that format string
substitutions happen in the consumer, not the logging
application. LLVM's current Signpost class doesn't take advantage of
this though and instead always uses a static "Begin/End %s" format
string.
This patch uses variadic macros to allow the API to be used as
intended. Unfortunately, the primary use-case I had in mind (the
LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() macro) does not get much better from this, because
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is *not* a macro, but a static string, so
signposts created by LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() still use a static "%s"
format string. At least LLDB_SCOPED_TIMERF() works as intended.
This reapplies the previously reverted patch with additional include
order fixes for non-modular builds of LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103575
One nice feature of the os_signpost API is that format string
substitutions happen in the consumer, not the logging
application. LLVM's current Signpost class doesn't take advantage of
this though and instead always uses a static "Begin/End %s" format
string.
This patch uses variadic macros to allow the API to be used as
intended. Unfortunately, the primary use-case I had in mind (the
LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() macro) does not get much better from this, because
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is *not* a macro, but a static string, so
signposts created by LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() still use a static "%s"
format string. At least LLDB_SCOPED_TIMERF() works as intended.
This reapplies the previsously reverted patch with additional MachO.h
macro #undefs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103575
This reverts commit db93e4e70a.
This modifies TestRegsters.py to account for Darwin showing
AVX registers as part of "Floating Point Registers" instead
of in a separate "Advanced Vector Extensions" category.
One nice feature of the os_signpost API is that format string
substitutions happen in the consumer, not the logging
application. LLVM's current Signpost class doesn't take advantage of
this though and instead always uses a static "Begin/End %s" format
string.
This patch uses variadic macros to allow the API to be used as
intended. Unfortunately, the primary use-case I had in mind (the
LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() macro) does not get much better from this, because
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is *not* a macro, but a static string, so
signposts created by LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() still use a static "%s"
format string. At least LLDB_SCOPED_TIMERF() works as intended.
This reapplies the previsously reverted patch with support for
platforms where signposts are unavailable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103575
Unfortunately the Darwin signpost header also pulls in the system
MachO header and so we need to make sure to use the LLVM versions of
those definitions.
One nice feature of the os_signpost API is that format string
substitutions happen in the consumer, not the logging
application. LLVM's current Signpost class doesn't take advantage of
this though and instead always uses a static "Begin/End %s" format
string.
This patch uses variadic macros to allow the API to be used as
intended. Unfortunately, the primary use-case I had in mind (the
LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() macro) does not get much better from this, because
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is *not* a macro, but a static string, so
signposts created by LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER() still use a static "%s"
format string. At least LLDB_SCOPED_TIMERF() works as intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103575
This reverts commit 00764c36ed and the
follow up d2223c7a49.
The original patch broke that one could use static member variables while
inside a static member functions without having a running target. It seems that
LLDB currently requires that static variables are only found via the global
variable lookup so that they can get materialized and mapped to the argument
struct of the expression.
After 00764c36ed static variables of the current
class could be found via Clang's lookup which LLDB isn't observing. This
resulting in expressions actually containing these variables as normal
globals that can't be rewritten to a member of the argument struct.
More specifically, in the test TestCPPThis, the expression
`expr --j false -- s_a` is now only passing if we have a runnable target.
I'll revert the patch as the possible fixes aren't trivial and it degrades
the debugging experience more than the issue that the revert patch addressed.
The underlying bug can be reproduced before/after this patch by stopping
in `TestCPPThis` main function and running: `e -j false -- my_a; A<int>::s_a`.
The `my_a` will pull in the `A<int>` class and the second expression will
be resolved by Clang on its own (which causes LLDB to not materialize the
static variable).
Note: A workaround is to just do `::s_a` which will force LLDB to take the global
variable lookup.
David Spickett