Summary:
The former are like:
libcxx/include/typeinfo:322:11: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'bad_cast' is deprecated because it has a user-declared destructor [-Wdeprecated-copy-dtor]
virtual ~bad_cast() _NOEXCEPT;
^
libcxx/include/typeinfo:344:11: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'std::bad_cast' first required here
throw bad_cast();
^
Fix these by adding an explicitly defaulted copy constructor.
The latter are like:
libcxx/include/codecvt:105:37: warning: dynamic exception specifications are deprecated [-Wdeprecated-dynamic-exception-spec]
virtual int do_encoding() const throw();
^~~~~~~
Fix these by using the _NOEXCEPT macro instead.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, #libc
Reviewed By: EricWF, #libc
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76150
Summary:
Currently, libc++'s `<stdexcept>` doesn't play nice with `vcruntime`. Specifically:
* `logic_error` and `runtime_error` have a different layout.
* libc++'s `logic_error` and `runtime_error` override `what()` but `vcruntime` does not.
* `vcruntime` uses weak vtables for `<stdexcept>` types.
* libc++'s `<stdexcept>` constructors and assignment operators may have different manglings than `vcruntimes`.
This patch makes libc++'s declarations in `<stdexcept>` match those provided by MSVC's STL as closely as possible.
If MSVC doesn't declare a special member, then neither do we. This ensures that the implicit definitions have the same linkage, visibility, triviality, and noexcept-ness.
Reviewers: thomasanderson, ldionne, smeenai
Reviewed By: thomasanderson
Subscribers: jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58945
llvm-svn: 355546
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
Summary:
`__libcpp_refstring` currently has two different definitions. First there is the complete definition in `<__refstring>` but there is also a second in `<stdexcept>`. The historical reason for this split is because both libc++ and libc++abi need to see the inline definitions of __libcpp_refstrings methods, but the `<stdexcept>` header doesn't. However this is an ODR violation and breaks the modules build.
This patch fixes the issue by creating a single class definition in `<stdexcept>` and changing `<__refstring>` to contain only the inline method definitions. This way both `libcxx/src/stdexcept.cpp` and `libcxxabi/src/stdexcept.cpp` see the same declaration in `<stdexcept>` and definitions in `<__refstring>`
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25603
llvm-svn: 285100
This patch removes the `<cstdlib>` include from exception where it is no longer
needed. Unlike my previous attempt this patch also adds <cstdlib> where needed
in other headers like <new> and <typeinfo>.
This won't fix the Firefox build issues discussed on IRC but it is more correct
for libc++.
llvm-svn: 280754
Add a new _LIBCPP_UNUSED define in __config, which can be used to
indicate explicitly unused items, and apply it to the __imp__ field of
__libcpp_refstring.
Somebody who knows about Microsoft C++ and IBM C++ should fill in the
unused attribute syntax appropriate for those compilers, if there is
any.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6836
llvm-svn: 228281
compatibility to libstdc++. Move the implementation into a header for
easier sharing with libc++abi. Merge a number of improvements from that
version. Provide a POD definition for <stdexcept>'s public use to avoid
cast dances. Discussed with Marshall Clow.
llvm-svn: 207695
Dimitry Andric