Commit Graph

27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oliver Stannard 1ed7d8ae36 [ARM] Add armv8a triple to test check updaters
llvm-svn: 355186
2019-03-01 09:26:21 +00:00
Roger Ferrer Ibanez 52a50395cd [utils] Use operator "in" instead of bound function "has_key"
has_key has been removed in Python 3. The in comparison operator can be used
instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55310

llvm-svn: 348576
2018-12-07 09:49:21 +00:00
Nemanja Ivanovic fce57f586d [NFC] Fix the regular expression for BE PPC in update_llc_test_checks.py
Currently, the regular expression that matches the lines of assembly for PPC LE
(ELFv2) does not work for the assembly for BE (ELFv1). This patch fixes it.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53059

llvm-svn: 345363
2018-10-26 03:30:28 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 980c4df037 Re-land r335297 "[X86] Implement more of x86-64 large and medium PIC code models"
Don't try to generate large PIC code for non-ELF targets. Neither COFF
nor MachO have relocations for large position independent code, and
users have been using "large PIC" code models to JIT 64-bit code for a
while now. With this change, if they are generating ELF code, their
JITed code will truly be PIC, but if they target MachO or COFF, it will
contain 64-bit immediates that directly reference external symbols. For
a JIT, that's perfectly fine.

llvm-svn: 337740
2018-07-23 21:14:35 +00:00
Chandler Carruth d86aad699d [UpdateTestChecks] Teach the x86 asm parser to skip over the function
begin label emitted for some routines with personality functions and
such.

Without this, we don't even recognize such functions as appearing in the
output and so don't attach any assertions to them. Happy to tweak this
or improve it if folks w/ deeper knowledge of the asm sequences that
show up here want.

llvm-svn: 336987
2018-07-13 10:29:23 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere b757fc3878 Revert "Re-land r335297 "[X86] Implement more of x86-64 large and medium PIC code models""
Reverting because this is causing failures in the LLDB test suite on
GreenDragon.

  LLVM ERROR: unsupported relocation with subtraction expression, symbol
  '__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' can not be undefined in a subtraction
  expression

llvm-svn: 335894
2018-06-28 17:56:43 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 88fee5fdbc Re-land r335297 "[X86] Implement more of x86-64 large and medium PIC code models"
The large code model allows code and data segments to exceed 2GB, which
means that some symbol references may require a displacement that cannot
be encoded as a displacement from RIP. The large PIC model even relaxes
the assumption that the GOT itself is within 2GB of all code. Therefore,
we need a special code sequence to materialize it:
  .LtmpN:
    leaq .LtmpN(%rip), %rbx
    movabsq $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.LtmpN, %rax # Scratch
    addq %rax, %rbx # GOT base reg

From that, non-local references go through the GOT base register instead
of being PC-relative loads. Local references typically use GOTOFF
symbols, like this:
    movq extern_gv@GOT(%rbx), %rax
    movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax

All calls end up being indirect:
    movabsq $local_fn@GOTOFF, %rax
    addq %rbx, %rax
    callq *%rax

The medium code model retains the assumption that the code segment is
less than 2GB, so calls are once again direct, and the RIP-relative
loads can be used to access the GOT. Materializing the GOT is easy:
    leaq _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_(%rip), %rbx # GOT base reg

DSO local data accesses will use it:
    movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax

Non-local data accesses will use RIP-relative addressing, which means we
may not always need to materialize the GOT base:
    movq extern_gv@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax

Direct calls are basically the same as they are in the small code model:
They use direct, PC-relative addressing, and the PLT is used for calls
to non-local functions.

This patch adds reasonably comprehensive testing of LEA, but there are
lots of interesting folding opportunities that are unimplemented.

I restricted the MCJIT/eh-lg-pic.ll test to Linux, since the large PIC
code model is not implemented for MachO yet.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47211

llvm-svn: 335508
2018-06-25 18:16:27 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 3a2fd1c2f3 Revert r335297 "[X86] Implement more of x86-64 large and medium PIC code models"
MCJIT can't handle R_X86_64_GOT64 yet.

llvm-svn: 335300
2018-06-21 22:19:05 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 247fe6aeab [X86] Implement more of x86-64 large and medium PIC code models
Summary:
The large code model allows code and data segments to exceed 2GB, which
means that some symbol references may require a displacement that cannot
be encoded as a displacement from RIP. The large PIC model even relaxes
the assumption that the GOT itself is within 2GB of all code. Therefore,
we need a special code sequence to materialize it:
  .LtmpN:
    leaq .LtmpN(%rip), %rbx
    movabsq $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.LtmpN, %rax # Scratch
    addq %rax, %rbx # GOT base reg

From that, non-local references go through the GOT base register instead
of being PC-relative loads. Local references typically use GOTOFF
symbols, like this:
    movq extern_gv@GOT(%rbx), %rax
    movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax

All calls end up being indirect:
    movabsq $local_fn@GOTOFF, %rax
    addq %rbx, %rax
    callq *%rax

The medium code model retains the assumption that the code segment is
less than 2GB, so calls are once again direct, and the RIP-relative
loads can be used to access the GOT. Materializing the GOT is easy:
    leaq _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_(%rip), %rbx # GOT base reg

DSO local data accesses will use it:
    movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax

Non-local data accesses will use RIP-relative addressing, which means we
may not always need to materialize the GOT base:
    movq extern_gv@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax

Direct calls are basically the same as they are in the small code model:
They use direct, PC-relative addressing, and the PLT is used for calls
to non-local functions.

This patch adds reasonably comprehensive testing of LEA, but there are
lots of interesting folding opportunities that are unimplemented.

Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47211

llvm-svn: 335297
2018-06-21 21:55:08 +00:00
Roman Lebedev dbd98b3a09 [Utils] update_llc_test_checks.py: support AMDGPU backend: AMDGCN, r600 triples
Summary:
Lack of that support has taken me by surprise.
I need to add (or at least look at) some tests for https://reviews.llvm.org/D47980#1127615,
and i don't really fancy doing that by hand.

The asm pattern is quite similar to that of x86:
https://godbolt.org/g/hfgeds
just with `#` replaced with `;`

Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, MaskRay, tstellar, arsenm

Reviewed By: arsenm

Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, rampitec, bogner, mareko, llvm-commits

Tags: #amdgpu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48001

llvm-svn: 334396
2018-06-11 09:20:21 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim ee7694442d [Utils][X86] Help update_llc_test_checks.py to recognise retl/retq to reduce CHECK duplication (PR35003)
This patch replaces the --x86_extra_scrub command line argument to automatically support a second level of regex-scrubbing if it improves the matching of nearly-identical code patterns. The argument '--extra_scrub' is there now to force extra matching if required.

This is mostly useful to help us share 32-bit/64-bit x86 vector tests which only differs by retl/retq instructions, but any scrubber can now technically support this, meaning test checks don't have to be needlessly obfuscated.

I've updated some of the existing checks that had been manually run with --x86_extra_scrub, to demonstrate the extra "ret{{[l|q]}}" scrub now only happens when useful, and re-run the sse42-intrinsics file to show extra matches - most sse/avx intrinsics files should be able to now share 32/64 checks.

Tested with the opt/analysis scripts as well which share common code - AFAICT the other update scripts use their own versions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47485

llvm-svn: 333749
2018-06-01 13:37:01 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 21d9c70b91 [utils] improve AArch64 asm parser
If we don't mark the cfi line as optional, the script won't
work with 'nounwind' code. Without that attr, there may be
extra noise in the asm body that we don't want to see.

llvm-svn: 330453
2018-04-20 17:16:23 +00:00
Daniel Cederman 1c8fb18557 Add SPARC support to update_llc_test_checks.py
Reviewers: spatel, jyknight

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45809

llvm-svn: 330401
2018-04-20 07:59:13 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 5334a2c571 [UpdateTestChecks] Add update_analyze_test_checks.py for cost model analysis generation
The script allows the auto-generation of checks for cost model tests to speed up their creation and help improve coverage, which will help a lot with PR36550.

If the need arises we can add support for other analyze passes as well, but the cost models was the one I needed to get done - at the moment it just warns that any other analysis mode is unsupported.

I've regenerated a couple of x86 test files to show the effect.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45272

llvm-svn: 329390
2018-04-06 12:36:27 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8296229826 [UpdateTestChecks] Moved core functionality of add_asm_checks into add_checks
As discussed on D45272

llvm-svn: 329270
2018-04-05 10:48:38 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 978502f475 [UpdateTestChecks] Split core functionality of add_ir_checks into add_checks
Cherry picked from D45272, also added some setup for add_asm_checks to use add_checks as well.

llvm-svn: 329266
2018-04-05 10:26:13 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 702ec04fee [UpdateTestChecks] Make add_asm_checks more like add_ir_checks
Towards merging them as mentioned on D45272

llvm-svn: 329265
2018-04-05 09:50:58 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim abba04886e [UpdateTestChecks] Remove unnecessary return from add_ir_checks
llvm-svn: 329262
2018-04-05 09:30:42 +00:00
Chandler Carruth ff2f4fcd51 [x86] Fix a pretty obvious think-o with my asm scrubbing. You have to in
fact use regular expression syntax to use regular expressions.

Should restore the bots. Sorry for the noise on this test.

Thanks to Philip for spotting the bug!

llvm-svn: 329057
2018-04-03 10:28:56 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 6646becd0c [x86] Extend my goofy SP offset scrubbing for llc test cases to actually
do explicit scrubbing of the offsets of stack spills and reloads.

You can always turn this off in order to test specific stack slot usage.
We were already hiding most of this, but the new logic hides it more
generically. Notably, we should effectively hide stack slot churn in
functions that have a frame pointer now, and should also hide it when
changing a function from stack pointer to frame pointer. That transition
already changes enough to be clearly noticed in the test case diff,
showing *every* spill and reload is really noisy without benefit. See
the test case I ran this on as a classic example.

llvm-svn: 329055
2018-04-03 09:57:05 +00:00
Alexander Richardson 115b0673b6 [UpdateTestChecks] Handle IR variables with a '-' in the name
Summary:
I noticed that clang will emit variables such as %indirect-arg-temp when
running update_cc1_test_checks.py and therefore update_cc1_test_checks.py
wasn't adding FileCheck captures for those variables.

Reviewers: MaskRay

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44459

llvm-svn: 327564
2018-03-14 20:28:53 +00:00
Fangrui Song 56fb2b2f20 Fix LLVM IR check lines in utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
Reviewers: arichardson

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44400

llvm-svn: 327538
2018-03-14 17:47:07 +00:00
Fangrui Song 0a301a194e [utils] Add utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
A utility to update LLVM IR in C/C++ FileCheck test files.

Example RUN lines in .c/.cc test files:

// RUN: %clang -S -Os -DXX %s -o - | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clangxx -S -Os %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=IR %s

Usage:

% utils/update_cc_test_checks.py --llvm-bin=release/bin test/a.cc
% utils/update_cc_test_checks.py --c-index-test=release/bin/c-index-test --clang=release/bin/clang /tmp/c/a.cc

    // NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
    // RUN: %clang -emit-llvm -S -Os -DXX %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=AA %s
    // RUN: %clangxx -emit-llvm -S -Os %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=BB %s
    using T =
    #ifdef XX
        int __attribute__((vector_size(16)))
    #else
        short __attribute__((vector_size(16)))
    #endif
        ;

    // AA-LABEL: _Z3fooDv4_i:
    // AA:       entry:
    // AA-NEXT:    %add = shl <4 x i32> %a, <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>
    // AA-NEXT:    ret <4 x i32> %add
    //
    // BB-LABEL: _Z3fooDv8_s:
    // BB:       entry:
    // BB-NEXT:    %add = shl <8 x i16> %a, <i16 1, i16 1, i16 1, i16 1, i16 1, i16 1, i16 1, i16 1>
    // BB-NEXT:    ret <8 x i16> %add
    T foo(T a) {
      return a + a;
    }

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42712

llvm-svn: 326591
2018-03-02 17:37:04 +00:00
Justin Bogner 35a9d1b17f update_mir_test_checks: Use the regexes from UpdateTestChecks.common
Some of the update_*_test_checks regexes have been moved into a
library, so we might as well use them in update_mir_test_checks.
Also includes minor bugfixes to the regexes that are there so we
don't regress update_mir_test_checks

llvm-svn: 326288
2018-02-28 00:56:24 +00:00
Fangrui Song 4f0f426d1f [utils] Refactor utils/update_{,llc_}test_checks.py to share more code
Summary:
This revision refactors 1. parser 2. CHECK line adder of utils/update_{,llc_}test_checks.py
so that thir functionality can be re-used by other utility scripts (e.g.  D42712)

Reviewers: asb, craig.topper, RKSimon, echristo

Subscribers: llvm-commits, spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42805

llvm-svn: 324803
2018-02-10 05:01:33 +00:00
Fangrui Song 3823fc46f5 Make utils/UpdateTestChecks/common.py Python 2/3 compatible and fix print statements.
Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42674

llvm-svn: 324104
2018-02-02 16:41:07 +00:00
Fangrui Song ee4e2e718d [utils] De-duplicate utils/update_{llc_,}test_checks.py
Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42654

llvm-svn: 323718
2018-01-30 00:40:05 +00:00