This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This diff adds testcase for the issue fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D77468
but regression test was not added in the diff. On Clang 9 it caused
crash in cland during code completion.
Test Plan: check-clang-unit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103722
ParmVarDecl is created with translation unit as the parent DeclContext
and later moved to the correct DeclContext. ASTImporterLookupTable
should be updated at this move.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103231
Template args of outer types were not fully-qualified when calling getFullyQualifiedType() for inner types.
For simplicity the patch is a copy-paste of the same call from getFullyQualifiedType().
Reviewed at: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103039
This allows to set a different indent width for preprocessor statements.
Example:
#ifdef __linux_
# define FOO
#endif
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103286
This re-applies the old patch D27651, which was never landed, into the
latest "main" branch, without understanding the code. I just applied
the changes "mechanically" and made it compiling again.
This makes the right pointer alignment working as expected.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR27353
For instance
const char* const* v1;
float const* v2;
SomeVeryLongType const& v3;
was formatted as
const char *const * v1;
float const * v2;
SomeVeryLongType const &v3;
This patch keep the *s or &s aligned to the right, next to their variable.
The above example is now formatted as
const char *const *v1;
float const *v2;
SomeVeryLongType const &v3;
It is a pity that this still does not work with clang-format in 2021,
even though there was a fix available in 2016. IMHO right pointer alignment
is the default case in C, because syntactically the pointer belongs to the
variable.
See
int* a, b, c; // wrong, just the 1st variable is a pointer
vs.
int *a, *b, *c; // right
Prominent example is the Linux kernel coding style.
Some styles argue the left pointer alignment is better and declaration
lists as shown above should be avoided. That's ok, as different projects
can use different styles, but this important style should work too.
I hope that somebody that has a better understanding about the code,
can take over this patch and land it into main.
For now I must maintain this fork to make it working for our projects.
Cheers,
Gerhard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103245
Summary:
suggestPathToFileForDiagnostics is actively used in clangd for converting
an absolute path to a header file to a header name as it should be spelled
in the sources. Current approach converts absolute path to relative path.
This diff implements missing logic that makes a reverse lookup from the
relative path to the key in the header map that should be used in the sources.
Prerequisite diff: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103229
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: dexonsmith, bruno, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tasks:
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103142
This patch adds support for matching gtest's ASSERT_THAT, EXPECT_THAT, ON_CALL and EXPECT_CALL macros.
Reviewed By: ymandel, hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103195
{D74265} reduced the aggressiveness of line breaking following C# attributes, however this change removed any support for attributes on properties, causing significant ugliness to be introduced.
This revision goes some way to addressing that by re-introducing the more aggressive check to `mustBreakBefore()`, but constraining it to the most common cases where we use properties which should not impact the "caller info attributes" or the "[In , Out]" decorations that are normally put on pinvoke
It does not address my additional concerns of the original change regarding multiple C# attributes, as these are somewhat incorrectly handled by virtue of the fact its not recognising the second attribute as an attribute at all. But instead thinking its an array.
The purpose of this revision is to get back to where we were for the most common of cases as a stepping stone to resolving this. However {D74265} has broken a lot of C# code and this revision will go someway alone to addressing the majority.
Reviewed By: jbcoe, HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103307
This inheritance list style has been widely adopted by Symantec,
a division of Broadcom Inc. It breaks after the commas that
separate the base-specifiers:
class Derived : public Base1,
private Base2
{
};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103204
WG14 adopted N2645 and WG21 EWG has accepted P2334 in principle (still
subject to full EWG vote + CWG review + plenary vote), which add
support for #elifdef as shorthand for #elif defined and #elifndef as
shorthand for #elif !defined. This patch adds support for the new
preprocessor directives.
The diff adds Remark to Diagnostic::Level for clang tooling. That makes
Remark diagnostic level ready to use in clang-tidy checks: the
clang-diagnostic-module-import becomes visible as a part of the change.
Since @bkramer bumped gtest to 1.10.0 I think it's a good time to clean
up some of my hacks.
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102643
Currently, we have support for SYCL 1.2.1 (also known as SYCL 2017).
This patch introduces the start of support for SYCL 2020 mode, which is
the latest SYCL standard available at (https://www.khronos.org/registry/SYCL/specs/sycl-2020/html/sycl-2020.html).
This sets the default SYCL to be 2020 in the driver, and introduces the
notion of a "default" version (set to 2020) when cc1 is in SYCL mode
but there was no explicit -sycl-std= specified on the command line.
In the case of TypedefDecls we set the DeclContext after we imported it.
It turns out, it could lead to null pointer dereferences during the
cleanup part of a failed import.
This patch demonstrates this issue and fixes it by checking if the
DeclContext is available or not.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102640
We've accumulated a scary amount of local patches to this directory. I
tried to merge them all, but if your favorite change is missing please
reapply it manually (and send it upstream).
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
Original commit message:
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This reverts commit 44a4000181.
We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to libSupport and
CMake Error at tools/clang/tools/clang-repl/cmake_install.cmake
file INSTALL cannot find
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
Non-comprehensive list of cases:
* Dumping template arguments;
* Corresponding parameter contains a deduced type;
* Template arguments are for a DeclRefExpr that hadMultipleCandidates()
Type information is added in the form of prefixes (u8, u, U, L),
suffixes (U, L, UL, LL, ULL) or explicit casts to printed integral template
argument, if MSVC codeview mode is disabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598
This fixes two errors:
Previously, clang-format was splitting up type identifiers from the
nullable ?. This changes this behavior so that the type name sticks with
the operator.
Additionally, nullable operators attached to return types in interface
functions were not parsed correctly. Digging deeper, it looks like
interface bodies were being parsed differently than classes and structs,
causing MustBeDeclaration to be incorrect for interface members. They
now share the same logic.
One other change is reintroducing the CSharpNullable type independent of
JsTypeOptionalQuestion. Despite having a similar semantic purpose, their
actual syntax differs quite a bit.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101860
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR35099.
I'm not sure if this decision was intentional but its definitely confusing for users.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101628
Previously, the JavaScript import sorter would ignore `// clang-format
off` and `on` comments. This change fixes that. It tracks whether
formatting is enabled for a stretch of imports, and then only sorts and
merges the imports where formatting is enabled, in individual chunks.
This means that there's no meaningful total order when module references are mixed
with blocks that have formatting disabled. The alternative approach
would have been to sort all imports that have formatting enabled in one
group. However that raises the question where to insert the
formatting-off block, which can also impact symbol visibility (in
particular for exports). In practice, sorting in chunks probably isn't a
big problem.
This change also simplifies the general algorithm: instead of tracking
indices separately and sorting them, it just sorts the vector of module
references. And instead of attempting to do fine grained tracking of
whether the code changed order, it just prints out the module references
text, and compares that to the previous text. Given that source files
typically have dozens, but not even hundreds of imports, the performance
impact seems negligible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101515
A need for such an option came up in a few libc++ reviews. That's because libc++ has both code in C++03 and newer standards.
Currently, it uses `Standard: C++03` setting for clang-format, but this breaks e.g. u8"string" literals.
Also, angle brackets are the only place where C++03-specific formatting needs to be applied.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101344
Reverts parts of https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183, but keeps the
resetDataLayout() API and adds an assert that checks that datalayout string and
user label prefix are in sync.
Approach 1 in https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183#2653279
Reduces number of TUs build for 'clang-format' from 689 to 575.
I also implemented approach 2 in D100764. If someone feels motivated
to make us use DataLayout more, it's easy to revert this change here
and go with D100764 instead. I don't plan on doing more work in this
area though, so I prefer going with the smaller, more self-consistent change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100776
Clang-format was indenting the lines following the `?` in the added test
case by +5 instead of +4. This only happens in a very specific
situation, where the `?` is followed by a multiline block comment, as in
the example. This fix addresses this without regressing any of the
existing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101033
The if condition was testing the current element, but
forgot to check the previous element (doh), so it
would fail depending on sort order of the imports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101020
`asserts` is a pseudo keyword in TypeScript used in return types.
Wrapping after it triggers automatic semicolon insertion, which
breaks the code semantics/syntax.
`asserts` is different from other pseudo keywords in that it is
specific to TS and only carries meaning in a very specific location.
Thus introducing a token type is probably overkill.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100953
Previously, clang-format would erroneously merge import and export
statements. These need to be kept separate, as the semantics differ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100752
This patch implements the copy assignment for `CompilerInvocation`.
Eventually, the deep-copy operation will be moved into a `clone()` method (D100460), but until then, this is necessary for basic ergonomics.
Depends on D100455.
Reviewed By: Bigcheese
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100473
Nathan Sidwell