gcc-9 started warning when a class defined a copy constructor without a
copy assignment operator (or vice-versa).
This fixes those warnings by deleting the other special member too
(after verifying it doesn't do anything non-trivial).
The tail-call-kind-ness is known by the ObjCARC analysis and can be
enforced while lowering the intrinsics to calls.
This allows us to get the requested tail calls at -O0 without trying to
preserve the attributes throughout passes that change code even at -O0
,like the Always Inliner, where the ObjCOpt pass doesn't run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69980
The mock server pretends the process stopped with signal 17, which is
SIGCHLD on linux. This causes lldb to resume to process, utterly
confusing the test. Lldb probably shouldn't resume in this case, but for
now this issue can be fixed by changing the signal number to 2, which is
SIGINT just about anywhere.
The Overflow version of XO-Form instruction uses the SO, OV and
OV32 special registers.
This changes modifies existing multiclasses and instruction
definitions to allow for the use of the XER register to record
the various types if overflow from possible add, subtract and
multiply instructions. It then modifies the existing instructions
as to use these multiclasses as needed.
Patch By: Kamau Bridgeman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66902
Summary:
TypeScript now supports declaring fields:
class Foo {
declare field: string;
}
clang-format happens to already format this fine, so this change just
adds a regression test.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69972
Summary:
JavaScript / TypeScript is adding two new operators: the null
propagating operator `?.` and the nullish coalescing operator `??`.
const x = foo ?? 'default';
const z = foo?.bar?.baz;
This change adds support to lex and format both.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69971
We effectively never want to export that function, which is an
implementation detail of libc++. This was previously tried in
603715c66b and then reverted in 8335dd314f because it caused
linker warnings. These linker warnings should go away now that we
use internal_linkage instead of always_inline to implement per-TU
insulation.
Re-try because earlier attempts were reverted due to use-after-free.
Hopefully, diagnosed correctly this time - we replace/remove the
invariant.start first rather than the invariant.end to avoid angering
worklist-based iteration.
We gather a set of white-listed instructions in isAllocSiteRemovable() and then
replace/erase them. But we don't know in general if the instructions in the set
have uses amongst themselves, so order of deletion makes a difference.
There's already a special-case for the llvm.objectsize intrinsic, so add another
for llvm.invariant.start.
Should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69977
Summary:
We use the name from the IdentifierInfo of the Macro to compute its
SymbolID. It is better to just take the Name as a parameter to avoid
storing the IdentifierInfo whenever we need the SymbolID for the Macro.
Patch by UTKARSH SAXENA!
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69937
Summary:
SimplifySelectsFeedingBinaryOp simplified binary ops when both operands
were selects with the same condition. This patch extends it to handle
these cases where only one operand is a select:
X op (C ? P : Q) -> C ? (X op P) : (X op Q)
// if X op P and X op Q both simplify
(C ? P : Q) op Y -> C ? (P op Y) : (Q op Y)
// if P op Y and Q op Y both simplify
For example: X *fast (C ? 1.0 : 0.0) -> C ? X : 0.0
Reviewers: mcberg2017, majnemer, craig.topper, qcolombet, mcrosier
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64713
This started passing target-features on the linker line, not just for RISCV but
for all targets, leading to error messages in Chromium Android build:
'+soft-float-abi' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+soft-float-abi' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
See Phabricator review for details.
Reverting until this can be fixed properly.
> Summary:
> 1. enable LTO need to pass target feature and abi to LTO code generation
> RISCV backend need the target feature to decide which extension used in
> code generation.
> 2. move getTargetFeatures to CommonArgs.h and add ForLTOPlugin flag
> 3. add general tools::getTargetABI in CommonArgs.h because different target uses different
> way to get the target ABI.
>
> Patch by Kuan Hsu Chen (khchen)
>
> Reviewers: lenary, lewis-revill, asb, MaskRay
>
> Reviewed By: lenary
>
> Subscribers: hiraditya, dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, mehdi_amini, inglorion, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits
>
> Tags: #clang
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67409
Summary:
There is a regression from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68467. Unlike class
forward declarations, function ducomentation is written in the declaration in
headers, the function definition doesn't contain any documentation, cases like:
```
foo.h
// this is foo.
void foo();
foo.cc
void foo() {}
```
we should still show documentation from the foo declaration.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69961
Summary:
Additional filtering of undesired shifts for targets that do not support them efficiently.
Related with D69116 and D69120
Applies the TLI.getShiftAmountThreshold hook to prevent undesired generation of shifts for the following IR code:
```
define i16 @testShiftBits(i16 %a) {
entry:
%and = and i16 %a, -64
%cmp = icmp eq i16 %and, 64
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
define i16 @testShiftBits_11(i16 %a) {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ugt i16 %a, 63
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
define i16 @testShiftBits_12(i16 %a) {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ult i16 %a, 64
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
```
The attached diff file shows the piece code in TargetLowering that is responsible for the generation of shifts in relation to the IR above.
Before applying this patch, shifts will be generated to replace non-legal icmp immediates. However, shifts may be undesired if they are even more expensive for the target.
For all my previous patches in this series (cited above) I added test cases for the MSP430 target. However, in this case, the target is not suitable for showing improvements related with this patch, because the MSP430 does not implement "isLegalICmpImmediate". The default implementation returns always true, therefore the patched code in TargetLowering is never reached for that target. Targets implementing both "isLegalICmpImmediate" and "getShiftAmountThreshold" will benefit from this.
The differential effect of this patch can only be shown for the MSP430 by temporarily implementing "isLegalICmpImmediate" to return false for large immediates. This is simulated with the implementation of a command line flag that was incorporated in D69975
This patch belongs to a initiative to "relax" the generation of shifts by LLVM for targets requiring it
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, asl
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: lenary, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326
Currently there is no way to describe the data that is not a part of an output section.
It can be a data used to align sections or to fill the gaps with something,
or another kind of custom data. In this patch I suggest a way to describe it. It looks like that:
```
Sections:
- Type: CustomFiller
Pattern: "CCDD"
Size: 4
- Name: .bar
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
Content: "FF"
```
I.e. I've added a kind of synthetic section with a synthetic type "CustomFiller".
In the code it is called a "SyntheticFiller", which is "a synthetic section which
might be used to write the custom data around regular output sections. It does
not present in the sections header table, but it might affect the output file size and
program headers produced. Think about it as about piece of data."
`SyntheticFiller` currently has a `Pattern` field and a `Size` field + an optional `Name`.
When written, `Size` of bytes in the output will be filled with a `Pattern`.
It is possible to reference a named filler it by name from the program headers description,
just like any other normal section.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69709
Summary:Add the setTargetNode member function to class DGEdge.
Authored By:etiotto
Reviewer:bmahjour, Whitney, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, fhahn, kbarton,
dmgreen
Reviewed By:Meinersbur
Subscribers:dexonsmith, kristina, llvm-commits
Tag:LLVM
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D68474
This reverts commit bcbb121ff6.
Using 'ls -o' is not compatible way to fix the problem. FreeBSD and OSX
version of 'ls' do not support -o flag and test gets failed on these
platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69317
The _m64 type is represented in IR as <1 x i64>. The x86-64 ABI
on Linux passes <1 x i64> as a double. MMX intrinsics use x86_mmx
type in IR.These things result in a lot of bitcasts in mmx code.
There's another instcombine that tries to turn bitcast <1 x i64>
to double into extractelement and a bitcast.
The combine here tries to reverse this extractelement conversion
if we see an mmx type.
Re-try rGef02831f0a4e (reverted due to use-after-free), but bail out completely
if we encounter an unexpected llvm.invariant.start.
We gather a set of white-listed instructions in isAllocSiteRemovable() and then
replace/erase them. But we don't know in general if the instructions in the set
have uses amongst themselves, so order of deletion makes a difference.
There's already a special-case for the llvm.objectsize intrinsic, so add another
for llvm.invariant.end.
Should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69977
Simon Pilgrim