Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
Summary:
Add zero-materializing XORs to X86's describeLoadedValue() hook in order
to produce call site values.
I have had to change the defs logic in collectCallSiteParameters() a bit
to be able to describe the XORs. The XORs implicitly define $eflags,
which would cause them to never be considered, due to a guard condition
that I->getNumDefs() is one. I have changed that condition so that we
now only consider instructions where a forwarded register overlaps with
the instruction's single explicit define. We still need to collect the implicit
defines of other forwarded registers to remove them from the work list.
I'm not sure how to move towards supporting instructions with multiple
explicit defines, cases where forwarded register are implicitly defined,
and/or cases where an instruction produces values for multiple forwarded
registers. Perhaps the describeLoadedValue() hook should take a register
argument, and we then leave it up to the hook to describe the loaded
value in that register? I have not yet encountered a situation where
that would be necessary though.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: ychen, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67225
llvm-svn: 371333
Summary:
The value operand in DW_OP_plus_uconst/DW_OP_constu value can be
large (it uses uint64_t as representation internally in LLVM).
This means that in the uint64_t to int conversions, previously done
by DwarfExpression::addMachineRegExpression, could lose information.
Also, the negation done in "-Offset" was undefined behavior in case
Offset was exactly INT_MIN.
To avoid the above problems, we now avoid transformation like
[Reg, DW_OP_plus_uconst, Offset] --> [DW_OP_breg, Offset]
and
[Reg, DW_OP_constu, Offset, DW_OP_plus] --> [DW_OP_breg, Offset]
when Offset > INT_MAX.
And we avoid to transform
[Reg, DW_OP_constu, Offset, DW_OP_minus] --> [DW_OP_breg,-Offset]
when Offset > INT_MAX+1.
The patch also adjusts DwarfCompileUnit::constructVariableDIEImpl
to make sure that "DW_OP_constu, Offset, DW_OP_minus" is used
instead of "DW_OP_plus_uconst, Offset" when creating DIExpressions
with negative frame index offsets.
Notice that this might just be the tip of the iceberg. There
are lots of fishy handling related to these constants. I think both
DIExpression::appendOffset and DIExpression::extractIfOffset may
trigger undefined behavior for certain values.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, rnk, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: jholewinski, aprantl, hiraditya, ychen, uabelho, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67263
llvm-svn: 371304
This currently triggers undefined behavior if executed with an
ubsan build. It is just a precommit of the test case to show that
we got a problem.
Fix is proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67263 and plan is to
commit the fix directly after this patch.
llvm-svn: 371303
Summary:
This patch renames functions that takes or returns alignment as log2, this patch will help with the transition to llvm::Align.
The renaming makes it explicit that we deal with log(alignment) instead of a power of two alignment.
A few renames uncovered dubious assignments:
- `MirParser`/`MirPrinter` was expecting powers of two but `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` were using deal with log2(align). This patch fixes it and updates the documentation.
- `MachineBlockPlacement` exposes two flags (`align-all-blocks` and `align-all-nofallthru-blocks`) supposedly interpreted as power of two alignments, internally these values are interpreted as log2(align). This patch updates the documentation,
- `MachineFunctionexposes` exposes `align-all-functions` also interpreted as power of two alignment, internally this value is interpreted as log2(align). This patch updates the documentation,
Reviewers: lattner, thegameg, courbet
Subscribers: dschuff, arsenm, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits, courbet
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945
llvm-svn: 371045
As DW_AT_rnglists_base points after the header and headers have
different sizes for DWARF32 and DWARF64, we have to use the format
of the CU to adjust the offset correctly in order to extract
the referenced range list table.
The patch also changes the type of RangeSectionBase because in DWARF64
it is 8-bytes long.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67098
llvm-svn: 371016
SROA pass processes debug info incorrecly if applied twice.
Specifically, after SROA works first time, instcombine converts dbg.declare
intrinsics into dbg.value. Inlining creates new opportunities for SROA,
so it is called again. This time it does not handle correctly previously
inserted dbg.value intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64595
llvm-svn: 370906
the test is building a 64-bit executable, so the addresses should be
64-bit too. The test was still passing even with smaller address size,
but it was hitting the "unexpected end of data" error sooner than it
should.
llvm-svn: 370882
When comparing variable locations, LiveDebugValues currently considers only
the machine location, ignoring any DIExpression applied to it. This is a
problem because that DIExpression can do pretty much anything to the machine
location, for example dereferencing it.
This patch adds DIExpressions to that comparison; now variables based on the
same register/memory-location but with different expressions will compare
differently, and be dropped if we attempt to merge them between blocks. This
reduces variable coverage-range a little, but only because we were producing
broken locations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66942
llvm-svn: 370877
Summary:
While fixing the handling of some error cases, r370363 introduced new
problems -- assertion failures due to unchecked errors (my excuse is that a very
early version of that patch used Optional<T> instead of Expected).
This patch adds proper handling of parsing errors encountered when
dumping location lists from inside DWARF DIEs, and adds a bunch of
additional tests.
I reorder the arguments of the location list dumping functions to make
them consistent, and also be able to dump the two kinds of location
lists generically.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: aprantl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67102
llvm-svn: 370868
Summary:
While examining this class for possible use in lldb, I noticed two
things:
- it spits out parsing errors directly to stderr
- the loclists parser can incorrectly return valid location lists when
parsing malformed (truncated) data
I improve the stderr situation by making the parseOneLocationList
functions return Expected<T>s. The errors are still dumped to stderr by
their callers, so this is only a partial fix, but it is enough for my
use case, as I intend to parse the locations lists one by one.
I fix the behavior in the truncated scenario by using the newly
introduced DataExtractor Cursor API.
I also add tests for handling the error cases, as they currently have no
coverage.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, probinson
Subscribers: lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63591
llvm-svn: 370363
The "join" method in LiveDebugValues does not attempt to join unseen
predecessor blocks if their out-locations aren't yet initialized, instead
the block should be re-visited later to see if any locations have changed
validity. However, because the set of blocks were all being "process"'d
once before "join" saw them, that logic in "join" was actually ignoring
legitimate out-locations on the first pass through. This meant that some
invalidated locations were not removed from the head of loops, allowing
illegal locations to persist.
Fix this by removing the run of "process" before the main join/process loop
in ExtendRanges. Now the unseen predecessors that "join" skips truly are
uninitialized, and we come back to the block at a later time to re-run
"join", see the @baz function added.
This also fixes another fault where stack/register transfers in the entry
block (or any other before-any-loop-block) had their tranfers initially
ignored, and were then never revisited. The MIR test added tests for this
behaviour.
XFail a test that exposes another bug; a fix for this is coming in D66895.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66663
llvm-svn: 370328
The test case used invalid source operands as input
to BTS64rr instructions (feeding register operands with
immediates). This patch changes those instruction into
using BTS64ri8 instead, which seems to better match the
operand types.
Fixes problems seen in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63973.
llvm-svn: 369866
LiveDebugValues gives variable locations to blocks, but it should also take
away. There are various circumstances where a variable location is known
until a loop backedge with a different location is detected. In those
circumstances, where there's no agreement on the variable location, it
should be undef / removed, otherwise we end up picking a location that's
valid on some loop iterations but not others.
However, LiveDebugValues doesn't currently do this, see the new testcase
attached. Without this patch, the location of !3 is assumed to be %bar
through the loop. Once it's added to the In-Locations list, it's never
removed, even though the later dbg.value(0... of !3 makes the location
un-knowable.
This patch checks during block-location-joining to see whether any
previously-present locations have been removed in a predecessor. If they
have, the live-ins have changed, and the block needs reprocessing.
Similarly, in transferTerminator, assign rather than |= the Out-Locations
after processing a block, as we may have deleted some previously valid
locations. This will mean that LiveDebugValues performs more propagation
-- but that's necessary for it being correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66599
llvm-svn: 369778
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 369664
An incorrect verification error revealed that the list of type tags was
incomplete. This patch adds the missing types by adding a tag kind to
the Dwarf.def file, which is used by the `isType` function.
A test was added for the original verification error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65914
llvm-svn: 368718
It caused assertions to fire when building Chromium:
lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:331: bool
{anonymous}::LiveDebugValues::OpenRangesSet::empty() const: Assertion
`Vars.empty() == VarLocs.empty() && "open ranges are inconsistent"' failed.
See https://crbug.com/992871#c3 for how to reproduce.
> Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
>
> To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368579
This isn't the most robust error handling API, but does allow clients to
opt-in to getting Errors they can handle. I suspect the long-term
solution would be to move away from the lazy unit parsing and have an
explicit step that parses the unit and then allows access to the other
APIs that require a parsed unit.
llvm-dwarfdump could be expanded to use this (or newer/better API) to
demonstrate the benefit of it - but for now lld will use this in a
follow-up cl which ensures lld can exit non-zero on errors like this (&
provide more descriptive diagnostics including which object file the
error came from).
(error access to later errors when parsing nested DIEs would be good too
- but, again, exposing that without it being a hassle for every consumer
may be tricky)
llvm-svn: 368377
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368339
D64033 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64033> added DW_AT_call_column for
inline sites. However, that change wasn't aware of "-gno-column-info".
To avoid adding column info when "-gno-column-info" is used, now
DW_AT_call_column is only added when we have non-zero column (when
"-gno-column-info" is used, column will be zero).
Patch by Wenlei He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64784
llvm-svn: 366264
The column field is missing for all inline sites, currently it's always
zero. This changes populates DW_AT_call_column field for inline sites.
Test case modified to cover this change.
Patch by: Wenlei He
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64033
llvm-svn: 365945
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
This allows targets to make more decisions about reserved registers
after isel. For example, now it should be certain there are calls or
stack objects in the frame or not, which could have been introduced by
legalization.
Patch by Matthias Braun
llvm-svn: 363757
This patch changes MIR stack-id from an integer to an enum,
and adds printing/parsing support for this in MIR files. The default
stack-id '0' is now renamed to 'default'.
This should make MIR tests that have stack objects with different stack-ids
more descriptive. It also clarifies code operating on StackID.
Reviewers: arsenm, thegameg, qcolombet
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60137
llvm-svn: 363533
Current findBestLoopTop can find and move one kind of block to top, a latch block has one successor. Another common case is:
* a latch block
* it has two successors, one is loop header, another is exit
* it has more than one predecessors
If it is below one of its predecessors P, only P can fall through to it, all other predecessors need a jump to it, and another conditional jump to loop header. If it is moved before loop header, all its predecessors jump to it, then fall through to loop header. So all its predecessors except P can reduce one taken branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256
llvm-svn: 363471
This is consistent with GCC's behavior (which is the defacto standard
for pubnames). Though I find the presence of enumerators from enum
classes to be a bit confusing, possibly a bug on GCC's end (since they
can't be named unqualified, unlike the other names - and names nested in
classes don't go in pubnames, for instance - presumably because one must
name the class first & that's enough to limit the scope of the search)
llvm-svn: 363349
We aim to ignore changes in variable locations during the prologue and
epilogue of functions, to avoid using space documenting location changes
that aren't visible. However in D61940 / r362951 this got ripped out as
the previous implementation was unsound.
Instead, use the FrameDestroy flag to identify when we're in the epilogue
of a function, and ignore variable location changes accordingly. This fits
in with existing code that examines the FrameSetup flag.
Some variable locations get shuffled in modified tests as they now cover
greater ranges, which is what would be expected. Some additional
single-location variables are generated too. Two tests are un-xfailed,
they were only xfailed due to r362951 deleting functionality they depended
on.
Apparently some out-of-tree backends don't accurately maintain FrameDestroy
flags -- if you're an out-of-tree maintainer and see changes in variable
locations disappear due to a faulty FrameDestroy flag, it's safe to back
this change out. The impact is just slightly more debug info than necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62314
llvm-svn: 363245
This behavior was added in r130928 for both FastISel and SD, and then
disabled in r131156 for FastISel.
This re-enables it for FastISel with the corresponding fix.
This is triggered only when FastISel can't lower the arguments and falls
back to SelectionDAG for it.
FastISel contains a map of "register fixups" where at the end of the
selection phase it replaces all uses of a register with another
register that FastISel sometimes pre-assigned. Code at the end of
SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction is doing the replacement at the
very end of the function, while other pieces that come in before that
look through the MachineFunction and assume everything is done. In this
case, the real issue is that the code emitting COPY instructions for the
liveins (physreg to vreg) (EmitLiveInCopies) is checking if the vreg
assigned to the physreg is used, and if it's not, it will skip the COPY.
If a register wasn't replaced with its assigned fixup yet, the copy will
be skipped and we'll end up with uses of undefined registers.
This fix moves the replacement of registers before the emission of
copies for the live-ins.
The initial motivation for this fix is to enable tail calls for
swiftself functions, which were blocked because we couldn't prove that
the swiftself argument (which is callee-save) comes from a function
argument (live-in), because there was an extra copy (vreg to vreg).
A few tests are affected by this:
* llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/swifterror.ll: we used to spill x21
(callee-save) but never reload it because it's attached to the return.
We now don't even spill it anymore.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/*/swiftself.ll: we tail-call now.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mubuf-legalize-operands.ll: I believe this
test was not really testing the right thing, but it worked because the
same registers were re-used.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/cmpxchg-O0.ll: regalloc changes
* llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/swifterror.ll: get rid of a copy
* llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/*: get rid of spills and copies
* llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/swift-return.ll: smaller stack
* llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-unordered.ll: smaller stack
* llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swifterror.ll: same as AArch64
* llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-declare-arg.ll: stack size changed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62361
llvm-svn: 362963
This commit reapplies r359426 (which was reverted in r360301 due to
performance problems) and rolls in D61940 to address the performance problem.
I've combined the two to avoid creating a span of slow-performance, and to
ease reverting if more problems crop up.
The summary of D61940: This patch removes the "ChangingRegs" facility in
DbgEntityHistoryCalculator, as its overapproximate nature can produce incorrect
variable locations. An unchanging register doesn't mean a variable doesn't
change its location.
The patch kills off everything that calculates the ChangingRegs vector.
Previously ChangingRegs spotted epilogues and marked registers as unchanging if
they weren't modified outside the epilogue, increasing the chance that we can
emit a single-location variable record. Without this feature,
debug-loc-offset.mir and pr19307.mir become temporarily XFAIL. They'll be
re-enabled by D62314, using the FrameDestroy flag to identify epilogues, I've
split this into two steps as FrameDestroy isn't necessarily supported by all
backends.
The logic for terminating variable locations at the end of a basic block now
becomes much more enjoyably simple: we just terminate them all.
Other test changes: inlined-argument.ll becomes XFAIL, but for a longer term.
The current algorithm for detecting that a variable has a single-location
doesn't work in this scenario (inlined function in multiple blocks), only other
bugs were making this test work. fission-ranges.ll gets slightly refreshed too,
as the location of "p" is now correctly determined to be a single location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61940
llvm-svn: 362951
Variable's stack location can stretch longer than it should. If a
variable is placed at the stack in a some nested basic block its range
can be calculated to be up to the next occurrence of the variable's
DBG_VALUE, or up to the end of the function, thus covering a basic
blocks that should not be included in the variable’s location range.
This happens because the DbgEntityHistoryCalculator ends register
locations at the end of a basic block only if the variable’s location
register has been changed throughout the function, which is not the
case for the register used to reference stack objects.
This patch also tries to produce a single value location if the location
list builder managed to merge all the locations into one.
Reviewers: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Reviewed By: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Subscribers: djtodoro, ivanbaev, asowda
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61600
llvm-svn: 362923
Incorrect Debug Variable Range was calculated while "COMPUTING LIVE DEBUG VARIABLES" stage.
Range for Debug Variable("i") computed according to current state of instructions
inside of basic block. But Register Allocator creates new instructions which were not taken
into account when Live Debug Variables computed. In the result DBG_VALUE instruction for
the "i" variable was put after these newly inserted instructions. This is incorrect.
Debug Value for the loop counter should be inserted before any loop instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62650
llvm-svn: 362750
When LiveDebugValues deduces new variable's location from spill, restore or
register copy instruction it should close old variable's location. Otherwise
we can have multiple block output locations for same variable. That could lead
to inserting two DBG_VALUEs for same variable to the beginning of the successor
block which results to ignoring of first DBG_VALUE.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, wolfgangp, dstenb
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: probinson, asowda, ivanbaev, petarj, djtodoro
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62196
llvm-svn: 362373
Summary:
When DwarfDebug::buildLocationList() encountered an undef debug value,
it would truncate all open values, regardless if they were overlapping or
not. This patch fixes so that it only does that for overlapping fragments.
This change unearthed a bug that I had introduced in D57511,
which I have fixed in this patch. The code in DebugHandlerBase that
changes labels for parameter debug values could break DwarfDebug's
assumption that the labels for the entries in the debug value history
are monotonically increasing. Before this patch, that bug could result
in location list entries whose ending address was lower than the
beginning address, and with the changes for undef debug values that this
patch introduces it could trigger an assertion, due to attempting to
emit location list entries with empty ranges. A reproducer for the bug
is added in param-reg-const-mix.mir.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, probinson
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62379
llvm-svn: 361820
This lead to errors when dumping binaries with v4 and v5 units linked
together (but could've also errored on v5 units that did/didn't use
str_offsets).
Also improves error handling and messages around invalid str_offsets
contributions.
llvm-svn: 361683
This test case was incorrect because it mixed DWARF32 and DWARF64 for a
single unit (DWARF32 unit referencing a DWARF64 str_offsets section). So
fix enough of the unit parsing for DWARF64 and make the test valid.
(not sure if anyone needs DWARF64 support though - support in
libDebugInfoDWARF has been added piecemeal and LLVM doesn't produce it
at all)
llvm-svn: 361582
This option provides only the base filename, not a full relative path.
Part of the fix for PR41839.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62071
llvm-svn: 361245
Trace through multiple COPYs when looking for a physreg source. Add
hinting for vregs that will be copied into physregs (we only hinted
for vregs getting copied to a physreg previously). Give hinted a
register a bonus when deciding which value to spill. This is part of
my rewrite regallocfast series. In fact this one doesn't even have an
effect unless you also flip the allocation to happen from back to
front of a basic block. Nonetheless it helps to split this up to ease
review of D52010
Patch by Matthias Braun
llvm-svn: 360887
The 3-field form was introduced by D3499 in 2014 and the legacy 2-field
form was planned to be removed in LLVM 4.0
For the textual format, this patch migrates the existing 2-field form to
use the 3-field form and deletes the compatibility code.
test/Verifier/global-ctors-2.ll checks we have a friendly error message.
For bitcode, lib/IR/AutoUpgrade UpgradeGlobalVariables will upgrade the
2-field form (add i8* null as the third field).
Reviewed By: rnk, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61547
llvm-svn: 360742
The condition !AddrPool.empty() is tested before attachRangesOrLowHighPC(), which may add an entry to AddrPool. We emit DW_AT_low_pc (DW_FORM_addrx) but may incorrectly omit DW_AT_addr_base for LineTablesOnly. This can be easily reproduced:
clang -gdwarf-5 -gmlt -c a.cc
Fix this by moving !AddrPool.empty() below.
This was discovered while investigating an lld crash (fixed by D61889) on such object files: ld.lld --gdb-index a.o
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61891
llvm-svn: 360678
Follow up to r359122, after a bug was reported in it - the original
change too aggressively tried to move related types out of type units,
which included unnamed types (like array types) which can't reasonably
be declared-but-not-defined.
A step beyond that is that some types in type units can be anonymous, if
they are types with a name for linkage purposes (eg: "typedef struct { }
x;"). So ensure those don't get turned into plain declarations (without
signatures) because, lacking names, they can't be resolved to the
definition.
[Also include a fix for llvm-dwarfdump/libDebugInfoDWARF to pretty print
types in type units]
llvm-svn: 360458
In certain circumstances, optimizations pick line numbers from debug
intrinsic instructions as the new location for altered instructions. This
is problematic because the line number of a debugging intrinsic is
meaningless (it doesn't produce any machine instruction), only the scope
information is valid. The result can be the line number of a variable
declaration "leaking" into real code from debugging intrinsics, making the
line table un-necessarily jumpy, and potentially different with / without
variable locations.
Fix this by using zero line numbers when promoting dbg.declare intrinsics
into dbg.values: this is safe for debug intrinsics as their line numbers
are meaningless, and reduces the scope for damage / misleading stepping
when optimizations pick locations from the wrong place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59272
llvm-svn: 360415