A year or so ago, I re-wrote most of the lit infrastructure in LLVM so
that it wasn't so boilerplate-y. I added lots of common helper type
stuff, simplifed usage patterns, and made the code more elegant and
maintainable.
We migrated to this in LLVM, clang, and lld's lit files, but not in
LLDBs. This started to bite me recently, as the 4 most recent times I
tried to run the lit test suite in LLDB on a fresh checkout the first
thing that would happen is that python would just start crashing with
unhelpful backtraces and I would have to spend time investigating.
You can reproduce this today by doing a fresh cmake generation, doing
ninja lldb and then python bin/llvm-lit.py -sv ~/lldb/lit/SymbolFile at
which point you'll get a segfault that tells you nothing about what your
problem is.
I started trying to fix the issues with bandaids, but it became clear
that the proper solution was to just bring in the work I did in the rest
of the projects. The side benefit of this is that the lit configuration
files become much cleaner and more understandable as a result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54009
llvm-svn: 346008
Summary:
This patch allows to resolve a symbol context block info even if a function
info was not requested. Also it adds the correct resolving of nested blocks
(the previous implementation used function blocks instead of them).
Reviewers: zturner, asmith, labath
Reviewed By: asmith
Subscribers: lldb-commits, stella.stamenova
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51104
llvm-svn: 340901
Summary:
This patch fixes a problem with retrieving a function symbol by an address in a nested block. In the current implementation of ResolveSymbolContext function it retrieves a symbol with PDB_SymType::None and then checks if found symbol's tag equals to PDB_SymType::Function. So, if nested block's symbol was found, ResolveSymbolContext does not resolve a function.
It is very simple to reproduce this. For example, in the next program
```
int main() {
auto r = 0;
for (auto i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
r += i & 1 + (i - 1) & 1 - 1;
}
return r;
}
```
if we will stop inside the cycle and will do a backtrace, the top element will be broken. But how we can test this? I thought to add an option to lldb-test to allow search a function by address, but the address may change when the compiler will be changed.
Patch by: Aleksandr Urakov
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Reviewed By: asmith, labath
Subscribers: stella.stamenova, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47939
llvm-svn: 336564
Summary:
This patch fixes a problem with retrieving a function symbol by an
address in a nested block. In the current implementation of
ResolveSymbolContext function it retrieves a symbol with
PDB_SymType::None and then checks if found symbol's tag equals to
PDB_SymType::Function. So, if nested block's symbol was found,
ResolveSymbolContext does not resolve a function.
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Reviewed By: asmith, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47939
Patch by Aleksandr Urakov <aleksandr.urakov@jetbrains.com>
llvm-svn: 335822
Zachary Turner