Catch trivially true statements of the form a != 1 || a != 3. Statements like
these are likely errors. They are particularly easy to miss when handling enums:
enum State {
RUNNING,
STOPPED,
STARTING,
ENDING
}
...
if (state != RUNNING || state != STARTING)
...
Patch by Blaise Watson!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
llvm-svn: 298607
Summary:
There is no need for triggering warning when noexcept specifier in move constructor or move-assignment operator is neither evaluated nor uninstantiated.
This fixes bug reported here: bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24712
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JonasToth, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Marek Jenda!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31049
llvm-svn: 298101
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
This patch also fixes nondeterministic behavior in the source code
location reported for the move when the move is constained in an init list;
this was causing buildbot failures in the previous attempt to submit
this patch (see D30569 and rL297004).
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650
llvm-svn: 297272
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30569
llvm-svn: 297004
Summary:
The misc-unconventional-assign-operator check had a false positive
warning when the 'operator*' in 'return *this' was unresolved.
Change matcher to allow calls to unresolved operator.
Fixes PR31531.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29393
llvm-svn: 295176
Summary:
Users might get confused easily when they see the check's message on
full template function speciliations.
Add a note to the output message, which mentions these kind of function
specializations are treated as regular functions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29928
llvm-svn: 295048
Now for real. The use case supported previously is used by approximately nobody.
What's needed is support for matching argument comments in EXPECT_xxx calls to
the names of parameters of the mocked methods.
llvm-svn: 294193
I have a created a new check for clang tidy: misc-string-compare. This will check for incorrect usage of std::string::compare when used to check equality or inequality of string instead of the string equality or inequality operators.
Example:
```
std::string str1, str2;
if (str1.compare(str2)) {
}
```
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits, malcolm.parsons, Prazek, mgorny, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27210
llvm-svn: 290747
The checker detects various cases when an enum is probably misused
(as a bitmask).
Patch by: Peter Szecsi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22507
llvm-svn: 290600
Summary:
An addition to the move-constructor-init check was duplicating the
modernize-pass-by-value check.
Remove the additional check and UseCERTSemantics option.
Run the move-constructor-init test with both checks enabled.
Fix modernize-pass-by-value false-positive when initializing a base
class.
Add option to modernize-pass-by-value to only warn about parameters
that are already values.
Reviewers: alexfh, flx, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26453
llvm-svn: 290051
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
Summary:
As a unique_ptr or shared_ptr that has been moved from is guaranteed to be null,
we only warn if the pointer is dereferenced.
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26041
llvm-svn: 285842
Summary:
This adds a diagnostic to the misc-use-after-move check that is output when the
use happens on a later loop iteration than the move, for example:
A a;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
a.foo();
std::move(a);
}
This situation can be confusing to users because, in terms of source code
location, the use is above the move. This can make it look as if the warning
is a false positive, particularly if the loop is long but the use and move are
close together.
In cases like these, misc-use-after-move will now output an additional
diagnostic:
a.cpp:393:7: note: the use happens in a later loop iteration than the move
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25612
llvm-svn: 284235
Summary:
* Fix a false postive when an using class is used in an explicit template instantiation.
* Fix a false postive when an using template class is used as template argument.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25437
llvm-svn: 283879
Summary:
This is needed for the recently submitted misc-use-after-move check (rL281453).
For some reason, this still built under Linux, but it caused the PPC build bot
to fail.
Subscribers: beanz, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24561
llvm-svn: 281460
Summary:
The check warns if an object is used after it has been moved, without an
intervening reinitialization.
See user-facing documentation for details.
Reviewers: sbenza, Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, shadeware, omtcyfz, Eugene.Zelenko, Prazek, fowles, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23353
llvm-svn: 281453
Summary:
The check emits a warning if std::move() is applied to a forwarding reference, i.e. an rvalue reference of a function template argument type.
If a developer is unaware of the special rules for template argument deduction on forwarding references, it will seem reasonable to apply std::move() to the forwarding reference, in the same way that this would be done for a "normal" rvalue reference.
This has a consequence that is usually unwanted and possibly surprising: If the function that takes the forwarding reference as its parameter is called with an lvalue, that lvalue will be moved from (and hence placed into an indeterminate state) even though no std::move() was applied to the lvalue at the callsite.
As a fix, the check will suggest replacing the std::move() with a std::forward().
This patch requires D23004 to be submitted before it.
Reviewers: sbenza, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, etienneb, alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, Eugene.Zelenko, mgehre, cfe-commits
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22220
llvm-svn: 280077
Summary:
The misc-argument-comment check now ignores leading and trailing underscores and
case. The new `StrictMode` local/global option can be used to switch back to
strict checking.
Add getLocalOrGlobal version for integral types, minor cleanups.
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23135
llvm-svn: 277729
function call expression.
Summary:
The check doesn't mark the template argument as used when the template
argument is a template.
Reviewers: djasper, alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22803
llvm-svn: 277444
Summary: This patch is adding support to recognize more complex redundant expressions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21392
llvm-svn: 274731
Alexander Kornienko