With a fix for PR41917: The predecessor list was changing under our feet.
- for (BasicBlock *Pred : predecessors(EntryBlock_)) {
+ while (!pred_empty(EntryBlock_)) {
+ BasicBlock* const Pred = *pred_begin(EntryBlock_);
llvm-svn: 361009
Instead of patching the original blocks, we now generate new blocks and
delete the old blocks. This results in simpler code with a less twisted
control flow (see the change in `entry-block-shuffled.ll`).
This will make https://reviews.llvm.org/D60318 simpler by making it more
obvious where control flow created and deleted.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, spatel
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61736
llvm-svn: 360771
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Summary:
This patch prevents MergeICmps to performn the transformation if the address operand GEP of the load instruction has a use outside of the load's parent block. Without this patch, compiler crashes with the given test case because the use of `%first.i` is still around when the basic block is erased from https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MergeICmps.cpp#L620. I think checking `isUsedOutsideOfBlock` with `GEP` is the original intention of the code, as the checking for `LoadI` is already performed in the same function.
This patch is incomplete though, as this makes the pass overly conservative and fails the test `tuple-four-int8.ll`. I believe what needs to be done is checking if GEP has a use outside of block that is not the part of "Comparisons" chain. Submit the patch as of now to prevent compiler crash.
Reviewers: courbet, trentxintong
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54089
llvm-svn: 346151
Summary:
The visitICmp analysis function would record compares of pointer types, as size 0. This causes the resulting memcmp() call to have the wrong total size.
Found with "self-build" of clang/LLVM on Windows.
Reviewers: christylee, trentxintong, courbet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53536
llvm-svn: 345413
Summary:
We do not try to move the instructions and split the block till we
know the blocks can be split, i.e. BCE-cmp-insts can be separated from
non-BCE-cmp-insts.
Reviewers: davide, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44443
llvm-svn: 329564
Summary: Fix a bug in entry block shuffled to middle of the chain.
Reviewers: davide, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44642
llvm-svn: 327971
Summary:
We can discard initial blocks that do other work
We do not need to limit ourselves to just the first block in the chain.
Reviewers: courbet, davide
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44029
llvm-svn: 326698
Summary:
Fix a bug in MergeICmp that can lead to a BCECmp block being processed more than once and eventually lead to a broken LLVM module.
The problem is that if the non-constant value is not produced by the last block, the producer will be processed once when the its parent block
is processed and second time when the last block is processed.
We end up having 2 same BCECmpBlock in the merge queue. And eventually lead to a broken LLVM module.
Reviewers: courbet, davide
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43825
llvm-svn: 326318
- Fix condition for detecting that a complex basic block was the first in
the chain.
- Add tests.
This was caught by buildbots when submitting rL324319.
llvm-svn: 324341
Summary: This is to avoid e.g. merging two cheap icmps if the target is not going to expand to something nice later.
Reviewers: dberlin, spatel
Subscribers: davide, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38232
llvm-svn: 314970
comparisons into memcmp.
Thanks to recent improvements in the LLVM codegen, the memcmp is typically
inlined as a chain of efficient hardware comparisons.
This typically benefits C++ member or nonmember operator==().
For now this is disabled by default until:
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33329 is complete
- Benchmarks show that this is always useful.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33987
llvm-svn: 312315
Clement Courbet