Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Aditya Kumar a525fffd07 [Loop Vectorize] Added a separate metadata
Added a separate metadata to indicate when the loop
has already been vectorized instead of setting width and count to 1.

Patch written by Divya Shanmughan and Aditya Kumar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36220

llvm-svn: 311281
2017-08-20 10:32:41 +00:00
Dorit Nuzman eac89d736c [LV/LoopAccess] Check statically if an unknown dependence distance can be
proven larger than the loop-count

This fixes PR31098: Try to resolve statically data-dependences whose
compile-time-unknown distance can be proven larger than the loop-count, 
instead of resorting to runtime dependence checking (which are not always 
possible).

For vectorization it is sufficient to prove that the dependence distance 
is >= VF; But in some cases we can prune unknown dependence distances early,
and even before selecting the VF, and without a runtime test, by comparing 
the distance against the loop iteration count. Since the vectorized code 
will be executed only if LoopCount >= VF, proving distance >= LoopCount 
also guarantees that distance >= VF. This check is also equivalent to the 
Strong SIV Test.

Reviewers: mkuper, anemet, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28044

llvm-svn: 294892
2017-02-12 09:32:53 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein 5185b7dde3 [LV] Remove triples from target-independent vectorizer tests. NFC.
Vectorizer tests in the target-independent directory should not have a target
triple. If a test really needs to query a specific backend, it belongs in the
right target subdirectory (which "REQUIRES" the right backend). Otherwise, it
should not specify a triple.

llvm-svn: 283512
2016-10-06 23:57:25 +00:00
Andrey Turetskiy 94c2179550 Quick fix for the test from rL272014 "[LAA] Improve non-wrapping pointer
detection by handling loop-invariant case" (s couple of buildbots failed).

Patch by Roman Shirokiy.

llvm-svn: 272019
2016-06-07 15:52:35 +00:00
Andrey Turetskiy 9f02c58670 [LAA] Improve non-wrapping pointer detection by handling loop-invariant case.
This fixes PR26314. This patch adds new helper “isNoWrap” with detection of
loop-invariant pointer case.

Patch by Roman Shirokiy.

Ref: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26314

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17268

llvm-svn: 272014
2016-06-07 14:55:27 +00:00