Commit Graph

737 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sjoerd Meijer 5110ff0817 [AArch64][CostModel] Fix cost for mul <2 x i64>
This was modeled to have a cost of 1, but since we do not have a MUL.2d this is
scalarized into vector inserts/extracts and scalar muls.

Motivating precommitted test is test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/AArch64/mul.ll,
which we don't want to SLP vectorize.

Test Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/extractvalue-no-scalarization-required.ll
unfortunately needed changing, but the reason is documented in
LoopVectorize.cpp:6855:

  // The cost of executing VF copies of the scalar instruction. This opcode
  // is unknown. Assume that it is the same as 'mul'.

which I will address next as a follow up of this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92208
2020-11-30 11:36:55 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer a2016dc887 [AArch64][SLP] Precommit tests which would be better not to SLP vectorize. NFC. 2020-11-27 13:43:16 +00:00
Florian Hahn 926681b6be
[CostModel] Add basic implementation of getGatherScatterOpCost.
Add a basic implementation of getGatherScatterOpCost to BasicTTIImpl.

The implementation estimates the cost of scalarizing the loads/stores,
the cost of packing/extracting the individual lanes and the cost of
only selecting enabled lanes.

This more accurately reflects the current cost on targets like AArch64.

Reviewed By: dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91984
2020-11-26 12:02:25 +00:00
Florian Hahn 3a1c6cec15
[AArch64] Add tests for masked.gather costs. 2020-11-23 17:33:27 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 1d1234b2a4 OpaquePtr: Update more tests to use typed sret 2020-11-20 20:08:43 -05:00
Matt Arsenault 20c43d6bd5 OpaquePtr: Bulk update tests to use typed sret 2020-11-20 17:58:26 -05:00
Matt Arsenault 06c192d454 OpaquePtr: Bulk update tests to use typed byval
Upgrade of the IR text tests should be the only thing blocking making
typed byval mandatory. Partially done through regex and partially
manual.
2020-11-20 14:00:46 -05:00
Anton Afanasyev 6f1c07b23a [SLP][Test] Update pr47269.ll test. NFC
Expand test for PR47269 to better demonstrate changes introduced by D90445.
2020-11-20 18:33:57 +03:00
Benjamin Kramer 4dbe12e866 [SLP] Use the minimum alignment of the load bundle when forming a masked.gather
Instead of the first load. That works when vectorizing contiguous loads,
but not for gathers.

Fixes a miscompile introduced in fcad8d3635.
2020-11-18 12:53:39 +01:00
Sanjay Patel 08834979e3 [SLP] avoid unreachable code crash/infloop
Example based on the post-commit comments for D88735.
2020-11-17 15:10:23 -05:00
Anton Afanasyev fcad8d3635 [SLP] Make SLPVectorizer to use `llvm.masked.gather` intrinsic
For the scattered operands of load instructions it makes sense
to use gathering load intrinsic, which can lower to native instruction
for X86/AVX512 and ARM/SVE. This also enables building
vectorization tree with entries containing scattered operands.
The next step is to add scattered store.

Fixes PR47629 and PR47623

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90445
2020-11-17 18:11:45 +03:00
Simon Pilgrim 10f8156e79 [SLPVectorizer][X86] Remove unused check-prefixes 2020-11-09 11:17:08 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 119e4550dd [SLPVectorizer][X86] Remove unused check-prefixes 2020-11-08 14:03:55 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim b215adf4ed [SLP][AMDGPU] Regenerate packed-math tests and remove unused check prefix 2020-11-06 17:27:13 +00:00
Florian Hahn d8d1cc647d [SLP] Also try to vectorize incoming values of PHIs .
Currently we do not consider incoming values of PHIs as roots for SLP
vectorization. This means we miss scenarios like the one in the test
case and PR47670.

It appears quite straight-forward to consider incoming values of PHIs as
roots for vectorization, but I might be missing something that makes
this problematic.

In terms of vectorized instructions, this applies to quite a few
benchmarks across MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86 with -O3 -flto

    Same hash: 185 (filtered out)
    Remaining: 52
    Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions

    Program                                        base    patch   diff
     test-suite...ProxyApps-C++/HPCCG/HPCCG.test     9.00   27.00  200.0%
     test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test     8.00   22.00  175.0%
     test-suite...T2006/458.sjeng/458.sjeng.test    14.00   30.00  114.3%
     test-suite...ce/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p.test    11.00   18.00  63.6%
     test-suite...s/FreeBench/neural/neural.test    12.00   18.00  50.0%
     test-suite...rimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des.test    65.00   95.00  46.2%
     test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test    63.00   89.00  41.3%
     test-suite...ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CLAMR.test   177.00  250.00  41.2%
     test-suite...nchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp.test    13.00   18.00  38.5%
     test-suite.../Applications/sgefa/sgefa.test    26.00   35.00  34.6%
     test-suite...pplications/oggenc/oggenc.test   100.00  133.00  33.0%
     test-suite...6/482.sphinx3/482.sphinx3.test   103.00  134.00  30.1%
     test-suite...oxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test   169.00  213.00  26.0%
     test-suite.../Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp.test    59.00   73.00  23.7%
     test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test   503.00  622.00  23.7%
     test-suite...T2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer.test    65.00   79.00  21.5%
     test-suite...libquantum/462.libquantum.test    58.00   68.00  17.2%
     test-suite...ternal/HMMER/hmmcalibrate.test    84.00   98.00  16.7%
     test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test   351.00  401.00  14.2%
     test-suite...arks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test    52.00   57.00   9.6%
     test-suite...ce/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh.test   118.00  128.00   8.5%
     test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test   6355.00 6880.00  8.3%
     test-suite...nsumer-lame/consumer-lame.test   480.00  519.00   8.1%
     test-suite...000/183.equake/183.equake.test   226.00  244.00   8.0%
     test-suite...chmarks/Olden/power/power.test   105.00  113.00   7.6%
     test-suite...6/471.omnetpp/471.omnetpp.test    92.00   99.00   7.6%
     test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test   1173.00 1261.00  7.5%
     test-suite...0/253.perlbmk/253.perlbmk.test    55.00   59.00   7.3%
     test-suite...oxyApps-C/miniAMR/miniAMR.test    92.00   98.00   6.5%
     test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test   446.00  473.00   6.1%
     test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test   464.00  491.00   5.8%
     test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test   998.00  1055.00  5.7%
     test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test   5711.00 6007.00  5.2%
     test-suite...FreeBench/distray/distray.test   102.00  107.00   4.9%
     test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test   4184.00 4378.00  4.6%
     test-suite...DOE-ProxyApps-C/CoMD/CoMD.test   112.00  117.00   4.5%
     test-suite...T2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk.test   104.00  108.00   3.8%
     test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test   789.00  819.00   3.8%
     test-suite...yApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT.test   233.00  241.00   3.4%
     test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test   417.00  428.00   2.6%
     test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test   627.00  643.00   2.6%
     test-suite.../Benchmarks/nbench/nbench.test   259.00  265.00   2.3%
     test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test   4641.00 4732.00  2.0%
     test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test   106.00  108.00   1.9%
     test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test   1639.00 1664.00  1.5%
     test-suite...oxyApps-C/RSBench/rsbench.test    66.00   65.00  -1.5%
     test-suite.../CINT2000/252.eon/252.eon.test   3416.00 3444.00  0.8%
     test-suite...CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp.test   1846.00 1861.00  0.8%
     test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test   152.00  153.00   0.7%
     test-suite...CFP2006/444.namd/444.namd.test   3528.00 3544.00  0.5%
     test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test    98.00   98.00   0.0%
     test-suite...frame_layout/frame_layout.test    NaN     39.00   nan%

On ARM64, there appears to be a slight regression on SPEC2006, which
might be interesting to investigate:

   test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test   0.9%

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88735
2020-11-06 12:50:32 +00:00
Simon Moll d3b33a7810 [VE][TTI] don't advertise vregs/vops
Claim to not have any vector support to dissuade SLP, LV and friends
from generating SIMD IR for the VE target.  We will take this back once
vector isel is stable.

Reviewed By: kaz7, fhahn

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90462
2020-11-06 11:12:10 +01:00
Anton Afanasyev e8d67ef2dc [SLP][X86][Test] Extend test coverage for PR47629
Add two cases for `<i32 x 8>`. Precommit for PR47629 and D90445. NFC
2020-11-03 17:51:24 +03:00
Florian Hahn d9cbf39a37 [SLP] Pass VecPred argument to getCmpSelInstrCost.
Check if all compares in VL have the same predicate and pass it to
getCmpSelInstrCost, to improve cost-modeling on targets that only
support compare/select combinations for certain uniform predicates.

This leads to additional vectorization in some cases

```
Same hash: 217 (filtered out)
Remaining: 19
Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions

Program                                        base    slp2    diff
 test-suite...marks/SciMark2-C/scimark2.test    11.00   26.00  136.4%
 test-suite...T2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk.test    79.00  135.00  70.9%
 test-suite...ediabench/gsm/toast/toast.test    54.00   71.00  31.5%
 test-suite...telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm.test    54.00   71.00  31.5%
 test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test   426.00  542.00  27.2%
 test-suite...ch/g721/g721encode/encode.test    30.00   24.00  -20.0%
 test-suite...000/186.crafty/186.crafty.test   116.00  138.00  19.0%
 test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test   697.00  765.00   9.8%
 test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test   822.00  886.00   7.8%
 test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test   154.00  162.00   5.2%
 test-suite...nsumer-lame/consumer-lame.test   621.00  651.00   4.8%
 test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test   223.00  231.00   3.6%
 test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test   680.00  695.00   2.2%
 test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test   2121.00 2129.00  0.4%
 test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test   2406.00 2412.00  0.2%
 test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test   634.00  634.00   0.0%
 test-suite...CFP2006/433.milc/433.milc.test   1036.00 1036.00  0.0%
 test-suite.../Benchmarks/nbench/nbench.test   321.00  321.00   0.0%
 test-suite...ctions-flt/Reductions-flt.test    NaN      5.00   nan%
```

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90124
2020-11-03 10:16:43 +00:00
Dávid Bolvanský 980b860e67 [SLP] Added testcase for PR47623 2020-11-02 16:02:50 +01:00
Simon Pilgrim b51b424c67 [SLP][X86] Add AVX512VL test target coverage for PR47629
As suggested on D90445 - the AVX512F test case alone won't handle 128/256-bit vector gather pattern very well
2020-11-02 11:40:40 +00:00
Florian Hahn 799033d8c5 Reland "[SLP] Consider alternatives for cost of select instructions."
This reverts the revert commit a1b53db324.

This patch includes a fix for a reported issue, caused by
matchSelectPattern returning UMIN for selects of pointers in
some cases by looking to some connected casts.

For now, ensure integer instrinsics are only returned for selects of
ints or int vectors.
2020-10-31 16:52:36 +00:00
Florian Hahn a1b53db324 Revert "[SLP] Consider alternatives for cost of select instructions."
This reverts commit 1922570489.

This appears to cause a crash in the following example

 a, b, c;
 l() {
   int e = a, f = l, g, h, i, j;
   float *d = c, *k = b;
   for (;;)
     for (; g < f; g++) {
       k[h] = d[i];
       k[h - 1] = d[j];
       h += e << 1;
       i += e;
     }
 }

 clang -cc1 -triple i386-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -target-cpu pentium-m -O1 -vectorize-loops -vectorize-slp reduced.c

 llvm::Type *llvm::Type::getWithNewBitWidth(unsigned int) const: Assertion `isIntOrIntVectorTy() && "Original type expected to be a vector of integers or a scalar integer."' failed.
2020-10-30 21:26:14 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 1eeae43107 [SLP][X86] Extend target coverage for PR47629
As suggested on D90445, add tests for various SSE/AVX levels and more complex gep pointer offsets
2020-10-30 15:20:41 +00:00
Nikita Popov 20b386aae0 [LoopUtils] Fix neutral value for vector.reduce.fadd
Use -0.0 instead of 0.0 as the start value. The previous use of 0.0
was fine for all existing uses of this function though, as it is
always generated with fast flags right now, and thus nsz.
2020-10-29 21:45:13 +01:00
Florian Hahn 1922570489 [SLP] Consider alternatives for cost of select instructions.
Some architectures do not have general vector select instructions (e.g.
AArch64). But some cmp/select patterns can be vectorized using other
instructions/intrinsics.

One example is using min/max instructions for certain patterns.

This patch updates the cost calculations for selects in the SLP
vectorizer to consider using min/max intrinsics.

This patch does not change SLP vectorizer's codegen itself to actually
generate those intrinsics, but relies on the backends to lower the
vector cmps & selects. This keeps things simple on the SLP side and
works well in practice for AArch64.

This exposes additional SLP vectorization opportunities in some
benchmarks on AArch64 (-O3 -flto).

Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions

Program                                        base    slp     diff
 test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test   502.00  697.00  38.8%
 test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test   1023.00 1414.00 38.2%
 test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test    56.00   65.00  16.1%
 test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test   804.00  822.00   2.2%
 test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test   3335.00 3357.00  0.7%
 test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test   2110.00 2121.00  0.5%
 test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test   2378.00 2382.00  0.2%

Reviewed By: RKSimon, samparker

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89969
2020-10-29 20:39:50 +00:00
Anton Afanasyev fcd54b82e8 [SLP][Test] Precommit test case for PR47629. NFC. 2020-10-28 22:09:36 +03:00
Florian Hahn 968aa6b917 [SLP] Add AArch64 tests with vectorizable compare/select patterns.
This patch adds an additional set of tests that can be vectorized
efficiently on AArch64, using CMxx & BFI.
2020-10-25 15:08:30 +00:00
Florian Hahn d842b88687 [SLP] Add tests with selects that can be turned into min/max.
AArch64 does not have a flexible vector select instruction. In some
cases, the selects can be turned into min/max however, for which there
are dedicated vector instructions on AArch64.

This patch adds some tests for such cases.
2020-10-22 17:25:28 +01:00
sstefan1 fbfb1c7909 [IR] Make nosync, nofree and willreturn default for intrinsics.
D70365 allows us to make attributes default. This is a follow up to
actually make nosync, nofree and willreturn default. The approach we
chose, for now, is to opt-in to default attributes to avoid introducing
problems to target specific intrinsics. Intrinsics with default
attributes can be created using `DefaultAttrsIntrinsic` class.
2020-10-20 11:57:19 +02:00
Amara Emerson 322d0afd87 [llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be first class intrinsics.
This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.

The autoupgrader will handle legacy intrinsics.

Relevant ML thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88787
2020-10-07 10:36:44 -07:00
Florian Hahn bb448a2483 [SLP] Add test where reduction result is used in PHI.
Test case for PR47670.
2020-10-02 13:38:53 +01:00
Alexey Bataev 3ff07fcd54 [SLP] Allow reordering of vectorization trees with reused instructions.
If some leaves have the same instructions to be vectorized, we may
incorrectly evaluate the best order for the root node (it is built for the
vector of instructions without repeated instructions and, thus, has less
elements than the root node). In this case we just can not try to reorder
the tree + we may calculate the wrong number of nodes that requre the
same reordering.
For example, if the root node is \<a+b, a+c, a+d, f+e\>, then the leaves
are \<a, a, a, f\> and \<b, c, d, e\>. When we try to vectorize the first
leaf, it will be shrink to \<a, b\>. If instructions in this leaf should
be reordered, the best order will be \<1, 0\>. We need to extend this
order for the root node. For the root node this order should look like
\<3, 0, 1, 2\>. This patch allows extension of the orders of the nodes
with the reused instructions.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45263
2020-09-21 10:51:03 -04:00
Eric Christopher ecfd8161bf Temporarily Revert "[SLP] Allow reordering of vectorization trees with reused instructions."
as it's infinite looping on occasion.

This reverts commit 455ca0ebb6.
2020-09-18 12:50:04 -07:00
Alexey Bataev 455ca0ebb6 [SLP] Allow reordering of vectorization trees with reused instructions.
If some leaves have the same instructions to be vectorized, we may
incorrectly evaluate the best order for the root node (it is built for the
vector of instructions without repeated instructions and, thus, has less
elements than the root node). In this case we just can not try to reorder
the tree + we may calculate the wrong number of nodes that requre the
same reordering.
For example, if the root node is \<a+b, a+c, a+d, f+e\>, then the leaves
are \<a, a, a, f\> and \<b, c, d, e\>. When we try to vectorize the first
leaf, it will be shrink to \<a, b\>. If instructions in this leaf should
be reordered, the best order will be \<1, 0\>. We need to extend this
order for the root node. For the root node this order should look like
\<3, 0, 1, 2\>. This patch allows extension of the orders of the nodes
with the reused instructions.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45263
2020-09-18 09:34:59 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 03783f19dc [SLP] sort candidates to increase chance of optimal compare reduction
This is one (small) part of improving PR41312:
https://llvm.org/PR41312

As shown there and in the smaller tests here, if we have some member of the
reduction values that does not match the others, we want to push it to the
end (bring the matching members forward and together).

In the regression tests, we have 5 candidates for the 4 slots of the reduction.
If the one "wrong" compare is grouped with the others, it prevents forming the
ideal v4i1 compare reduction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87772
2020-09-17 08:49:27 -04:00
Sanjay Patel b011611e37 [SLP] add tests for reduction ordering; NFC 2020-09-16 13:28:19 -04:00
Huihui Zhang 3b7f5166bd [SLPVectorizer][SVE] Skip scalable-vector instructions before vectorizeSimpleInstructions.
For scalable type, the aggregated size is unknown at compile-time.
Skip instructions with scalable type to ensure the list of instructions
for vectorizeSimpleInstructions does not contains any scalable-vector instructions.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87550
2020-09-15 13:10:15 -07:00
Sanjay Patel 40f12ef621 [SLP] further limit bailout for load combine candidate (PR47450)
The test example based on PR47450 shows that we can
match non-byte-sized shifts, but those won't ever be
bswap opportunities. This isn't a full fix (we'd still
match if the shifts were by 8-bits for example), but
this should be enough until there's evidence that we
need to do more (this is a borderline case for
vectorization in the first place).
2020-09-11 11:56:11 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 54680591e8 [SLP] add test for missed store vectorization; NFC 2020-09-11 11:56:11 -04:00
Craig Topper c195ae2f00 [SLPVectorizer][X86][AMDGPU] Remove fcmp+select to fmin/fmax reduction support.
Previously we could match fcmp+select to a reduction if the fcmp had
the nonans fast math flag. But if the select had the nonans fast
math flag, InstCombine would turn it into a fminnum/fmaxnum intrinsic
before SLP gets to it. Seems fairly likely that if one of the
fcmp+select pair have the fast math flag, they both would.

My plan is to start vectorizing the fmaxnum/fminnum version soon,
but I wanted to get this code out as it had some of the strangest
fast math flag behaviors.
2020-09-10 11:49:19 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim de25ebaac6 [CostModel][X86] Add vXi32 division by uniform constant costs (PR47476)
Other types can be handled in future patches but their uniform / non-uniform costs are more similar and don't appear to cause many vectorization issues.
2020-09-10 12:17:54 +01:00
Simon Pilgrim 0aea3a79ad [SLP][X86] Add division by uniform constant tests (PR47476) 2020-09-10 11:52:20 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 78e4aeb783 [NewPM][test] Fix accelerate-vector-functions.ll under NPM
The legacy SLPVectorizer has a dependency on InjectTLIMappingsLegacy.
That cannot be expressed in the new PM since they are both normal
passes. Explicitly add -inject-tli-mappings as a pass.

Reviewed By: spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86492
2020-08-25 10:50:14 -07:00
Sanjay Patel c4f0a0896f [InstCombine] improve demanded element analysis for vector insert-of-extract (2nd try)
The 1st attempt (rG557b890) was reverted because it caused miscompiles.
That bug is avoided here by changing the order of folds and as verified
in the new tests.

Original commit message:
InstCombine currently has odd rules for folding insert-extract chains to shuffles,
so we miss collapsing seemingly simple cases as shown in the tests here.

But poison makes this not quite as easy as we might have guessed. Alive2 tests to
show the subtle difference (similar to the regression tests):
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hp4hv3 (this is ok)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ehEWaN (poison leakage)

SLP tends to create these patterns (as shown in the SLP tests), and this could
help with solving PR16739.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86460
2020-08-25 11:19:36 -04:00
Benjamin Kramer c6fb72de4f Revert "[InstCombine] improve demanded element analysis for vector insert-of-extract"
This reverts commit 557b890ff4. Causing
miscompiles, test case is on llvm-commits.
2020-08-25 11:31:31 +02:00
Sanjay Patel 557b890ff4 [InstCombine] improve demanded element analysis for vector insert-of-extract
InstCombine currently has odd rules for folding insert-extract chains to shuffles,
so we miss collapsing seemingly simple cases as shown in the tests here.

But poison makes this not quite as easy as we might have guessed. Alive2 tests to
show the subtle difference (similar to the regression tests):
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hp4hv3 (this is ok)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ehEWaN (poison leakage)

SLP tends to create these patterns (as shown in the SLP tests), and this could
help with solving PR16739.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86460
2020-08-24 17:00:16 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 7661c8c040 [SLP] avoid 'tmp' names in regression tests; NFC
That can cause problems for update_test_checks.py (it warns when updating this file).
2020-08-24 17:00:16 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks b79889c2b1 [opt][NewPM] Add basic-aa in legacy PM compatibility mode
The legacy PM alias analysis pipeline by default includes basic-aa.
When running `opt -foo-pass` under the NPM and -disable-basic-aa is not
specified, use basic-aa.

This decreases the number of check-llvm failures under NPM from 913 to 752.

Reviewed By: ychen, asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86167
2020-08-21 14:05:07 -07:00
Sanjay Patel c98fcba55c [SLP] remove instcombine dependency from regression test; NFC
InstCombine doesn't do that much here - sinks some instructions
and improves alignments - but that should not be part of the
SLP pass unit testing.
2020-08-18 10:18:22 -04:00
Thomas Lively f969734c21 Reland "[SLPVectorizer] Pre-commit a test for D85759"
This reverts commit 52b71aa8b1.

The problem was a missing lit.local.cfg file, which was causing the
test to be incorrectly run on bots that had not built the WebAssembly
target.
2020-08-11 12:18:33 -07:00