Revision e1de2773a5 provided support for
accepting integer registers in inline asm i.e.
__asm("lhi %r0, 5") -> lhi %r0, 5
__asm("lhi 0, 5") -> lhi 0,5
This patch aims to extend this support to instructions which compute
addresses as well. (i.e instructions of type BDMem and BD[X|R|V|L]Mem)
Author: anirudhp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83251
Registers used in any address (as well as in a few other contexts)
have special semantics when a "zero" register is used, which is
why the back-end defines extra register classes ADDR32, ADDR64 etc
to be used to prevent the register allocator from using %r0 there.
However, when writing assembler code "by hand", you sometimes need
to trigger that special semantics. However, currently the AsmParser
will reject %r0 in those places. In some cases it may be possible
to write that instruction differently - but in others it is currently
not possible at all.
This check in AsmParser simply seems overly strict, so this patch
just removes the check completely. This brings the behaviour of
AsmParser in line with the GNU assembler as well.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45092
Demand that an immediate offset to a PC relative address fits in 32 bits, or
else load it into a register and perform a separate add.
Verify in the assembler that such immediate offsets fit the bitwidth.
Even though the final address of a Load Address Relative Long may fit in 32
bits even with a >32 bit offset (depending on where the symbol lives relative
to PC), the GNU toolchain demands the offset by itself to be in range. This
patch adapts the same behavior for llvm.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69749
This adds all remaining instructions that were still missing, mostly
privileged and semi-privileged system-level instructions. These are
provided for use with the assembler and disassembler only.
This brings the LLVM assembler / disassembler to parity with the
GNU binutils tools.
llvm-svn: 306876
There are a few instructions provided by the high-word facility (z196)
that we cannot easily exploit for code generation. This patch at least
adds those missing instructions for the assembler and disassembler.
This means that now all nonprivileged instructions up to z13 are
supported by the LLVM assembler / disassembler.
llvm-svn: 306821
This adds assembler / disassembler support for the decimal
floating-point instructions. Since LLVM does not yet have
support for decimal float types, these cannot be used for
codegen at this point.
llvm-svn: 304203
This adds assembler / disassembler support for the hexadecimal
floating-point instructions. Since the Linux ABI does not use
any hex float data types, these are not useful for codegen.
llvm-svn: 304202
This adds a few missing instructions for the assembler and
disassembler. Those should be the last missing general-
purpose (Chapter 7) instructions for the z10 ISA.
llvm-svn: 302667
This adds the remaining general arithmetic instructions
for assembler / disassembler use. Most of these are not
useful for codegen; a few might be, and those are listed
in the README.txt for future improvements.
llvm-svn: 302665
The assembler and disassmebler test cases started out formatted and
sorted in a particular way, but this got lost over time as patches
were added. Reformat them again. NFC.
llvm-svn: 302642
Add assembler support for all atomic instructions that weren't already
supported. Some of those could be used to implement codegen for 128-bit
atomic operations, but this isn't done here yet.
llvm-svn: 288526
Add assembler support for instructions manipulating the FPC.
Also add codegen support via the GCC compatibility builtins:
__builtin_s390_sfpc
__builtin_s390_efpc
llvm-svn: 288525
This patch adds assembler support for the remaining branch instructions:
the non-relative branch on count variants, and all variants of branch
on index.
The only one of those that can be readily exploited for code generation
is BRCTH (branch on count using a high 32-bit register as count). Do
use it, however, it is necessary to also introduce a hew CHIMux pseudo
to allow comparisons of a 32-bit value agains a short immediate to go
into a high register as well (implemented via CHI/CIH).
This causes a bit of codegen changes overall, but those have proven to
be neutral (or even beneficial) in performance measurements.
llvm-svn: 288029
This adds support for the 31-to-64-bit zero extension instructions
LLGT and LLGTR and uses them for code generation where appropriate.
Since this operation can also be performed via RISBG, we have to
update SystemZDAGToDAGISel::tryRISBGZero so that we prefer LLGT
over RISBG in case both are possible. The patch includes some
simplification to the tryRISBGZero code; this is not intended
to cause any (further) functional change in codegen.
llvm-svn: 286585
This completes assembler / disassembler support for all BFP
instructions provided by the floating-point extensions facility.
The instructions added here are not currently used for codegen.
llvm-svn: 286285
Add several instructions that operate on the program mask
or the addressing mode. These are not really needed for
code generation under Linux, but are provided for completeness
for the assembler/disassembler.
llvm-svn: 286284
Add the 16 access registers as LLVM registers. This allows removing
a lot of special cases in the assembler and disassembler where we
were handling access registers; this can all just use the generic
register code now.
Also add a bunch of instructions to operate on access registers,
for assembler/disassembler use only. No change in code generation
intended.
llvm-svn: 286283
Rework patterns for branches, call & return instructions,
compare-and-branch, compare-and-trap, and conditional move
instructions.
In particular, simplify creation of patterns for the extended
opcodes of instructions that take a CC mask.
Also, use semantical instruction classes for all the instructions
instead of open-coding them in SystemZInstrInfo.td.
Adds a couple of the basic branch instructions (that are unused
for codegen) for the assembler/disassembler.
llvm-svn: 286263
This patch implements two changes:
- Move processor feature definition into a new file SystemZFeatures.td,
and provide explicit lists of supported and unsupported features for
each level of the z/Architecture. This allows specifying unsupported
features in the scheduler definition files for each processor.
- Add optional aliases for the -mcpu processor names according to the
level of the z/Architecture, for compatibility with other compilers
on the platform. The supported aliases are:
-mcpu=arch8 equals -mcpu=z10
-mcpu=arch9 equals -mcpu=z196
-mcpu=arch10 equals -mcpu=zEC12
-mcpu=arch11 equals -mcpu=z13
llvm-svn: 285577
Currently, when using an instruction that is not supported on the
currently selected architecture, the LLVM assembler is likely to
diagnose an "invalid operand" instead of a "missing feature".
This is because many operands require a custom parser in order to
be processed correctly, and if an instruction is not available
according to the current feature set, the generated parser code
will also not detect the associated custom operand parsers.
Fixed by temporarily enabling all features while parsing operands.
The missing features will then be correctly detected when actually
parsing the instruction itself.
llvm-svn: 285575
LLVM currently treats the first operand of MVCK as if it were a
regular base+index+displacement address. However, it is in fact
a base+displacement combined with a length register field.
While the two might look syntactically similar, there are two
semantic differences:
- %r0 is a valid length register, even though it cannot be used
as an index register.
- In an expression with just a single register like 0(%rX), the
register is treated as base with normal addresses, while it is
treated as the length register (with an empty base) for MVCK.
Fixed by adding a new operand parser class BDRAddr and reworking
the assembler parser to distinguish between address + length
register operands and regular addresses.
llvm-svn: 285574
Summary:
Add instruction formats E, RSI, SSd, SSE, and SSF.
Added BRXH, BRXLE, PR, MVCK, STRAG, and ECTG instructions to test out
those formats.
Reviewers: uweigand
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23179
llvm-svn: 277822
Support and generate Compare and Traps like CRT, CIT, etc.
Support Trap as legal DAG opcodes and generate "j .+2" for them by default.
Add support for Conditional Traps and use the If Converter to convert them into
the corresponding compare and trap opcodes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21155
llvm-svn: 272419
We already exploit a number of instructions specific to z196,
but not yet POPCNT. Add support for the population-count
facility, MC support for the POPCNT instruction, CodeGen
support for using POPCNT, and implement the getPopcntSupport
TargetTransformInfo hook.
llvm-svn: 233689
Originally committed as r191661, but reverted because it changed the matching
order of comparisons on some hosts. That should have been fixed by r191735.
llvm-svn: 191738
For some reason, adding definitions for these load and store
instructions changed whether some of the build bots matched
comparisons as signed or unsigned.
llvm-svn: 191663
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 190930
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
llvm-svn: 190400
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189469
Ulrich Weigand