to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Correct the case of the local variables..
Rational:
I want to be able to run clang-tidy on new clang-tidy checker code prior to creating a review (to demonstrate we should dog food our own tools during development, not my suggestion but @Eugene.Zelenko)
To this end I am running the following in a script, prior to make a change.
```
tidy:
@for source in $$(git status -suno | grep ".cpp$$" | cut -c4-) ;\
do \
clang-tidy -quiet $$source -- $(TIDY_FLAGS);\
done
```
I then want to go through the checkers and see which checkers most closely match the review style of the reviewers
```
---
Checks: '
-clang-diagnostic-*,
readability-identifier-naming,
llvm-header-guard
'
WarningsAsErrors: ''
HeaderFilterRegex: ''
AnalyzeTemporaryDtors: false
FormatStyle: LLVM
CheckOptions:
- key: readability-identifier-naming.IgnoreFailedSplit
value: '0'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.VariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.LocalVariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
...
```
Unfortunately in doing so, I have identified that my previous review {D55433} it violates what looks like to be the convention of local variables being in CamelCase.
Sending this small review in the hope it can be corrected.
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56536
llvm-svn: 350814
Summary: Adds a checker to clang-tidy to warn when a non void const member function, taking only parameters passed by value or const reference could be marked as '[[nodiscard]]'
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, stephenkelly, curdeius, aaron.ballman, hokein, JonasToth
Reviewed By: curdeius, JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, lefticus, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55433
llvm-svn: 350760
Chandler Carruth