Previously we would attempt to build a TypeSourceInfo for a null type,
and then we would forget to pop the function scope before returning an
error.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6665
llvm-svn: 224271
Don't send a value dependent expression into the expression evaluator,
HandleSizeof would crash. Making HandleSizeof handle dependent types
would noisily warn about the operation even if everything turns out OK
after instantiation.
This fixes PR21848.
llvm-svn: 224240
We would exit Sema::ActOnFinishSwitchStmt early if we didn't have a
body. This would leave an extra SwitchStmt on the SwitchStack.
This fixes PR21841.
llvm-svn: 224237
the simplest case, which is used when no chunk_size is specified in
the schedule(static) or no 'schedule' clause is specified - the
iteration space is divided by the library into chunks that are
approximately equal in size, and at most one chunk is distributed
to each thread. In this case, we do not need an outer loop in each
thread - each thread requests once which iterations range it should
handle (using __kmpc_for_static_init runtime call) and then runs the
inner loop on this range.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5865
llvm-svn: 224233
ignore it during overload resolution when initializing
X from a value of type cv X.
Previously, our rule here only ignored specializations
of constructor templates. That's probably because the
standard says that constructors are outright ill-formed
if their first parameter is literally X and they're
callable with one argument. However, Clang only
enforces that prohibition against non-implicit
instantiations; I'm not sure why, but it seems to be
deliberate. Given that, the most sensible thing to
do is to just ignore the "illegal" constructor
regardless of where it came from.
Also, stop ignoring such constructors silently:
print a note explaining why they're being ignored.
Fixes <rdar://19199836>.
llvm-svn: 224205
Sema::handleAnnotateAttr expects that some basic validation is done on
the given AttributeList. However, ProcessAccessDeclAttributeList called
it directly. Instead, pass the list to ProcessDeclAttribute.
This fixes PR21847.
llvm-svn: 224204
We would crash trying to treat a property member as a field. These
shoudl be forbidden anyway, reject programs which contain them.
This fixes PR21840.
llvm-svn: 224193
clang lets programmers be pretty cavalier when it comes to void return
statements in functions which have non-void return types. However, we
cannot be so forgiving in constexpr functions: evaluation will go off
the rails very quickly.
Instead, keep the return statement in the AST but mark the function as
invalid. Doing so gives us nice diagnostics while making constexpr
evaluation halt.
This fixes PR21859.
llvm-svn: 224189
The extension has the following syntax:
__builtin_call_with_static_chain(Call, Chain)
where Call must be a function call expression and Chain must be of pointer type
This extension performs a function call Call with a static chain pointer
Chain passed to the callee in a designated register. This is useful for
calling foreign language functions whose ABI uses static chain pointers
(e.g. to implement closures).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6332
llvm-svn: 224167
This means that a pointer to the struct type to which the attribute appertains
is a CF type (and therefore an Objective-C object of some type), but not of any
specific class. rdar://19157264
llvm-svn: 224072
While we would correctly handle asm("foo") and reject asm(L"bar"), we
weren't careful to handle cases where an ascii literal could be
concatenated with a wide literal.
This fixes PR21822.
llvm-svn: 223992
Placing the attribute after the kernel keyword would incorrectly
reject the attribute, so use the smae workaround that other
kernel only attributes use.
Also add a FIXME because there are two different phrasings now
for the same error, althoug amdgpu_num_[sv]gpr uses a consistent one.
llvm-svn: 223490
Summary:
Allow CUDA host device functions with two code paths using __CUDA_ARCH__
to differentiate between code path being compiled.
For example:
__host__ __device__ void host_device_function(void) {
#ifdef __CUDA_ARCH__
device_only_function();
#else
host_only_function();
#endif
}
Patch by Jacques Pienaar.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6457
llvm-svn: 223271
According to OpenMP standard, Section 2.12.6, atomic Construct, '#pragma omp atomic write' is allowed to be used only for expression statements of form 'x = expr;', where x is a lvalue expression and expr is an expression with scalar type. Patch adds checks for it.
llvm-svn: 222913
This attribute serves as a hint to improve warnings about the ranges of
enumerators used as flag types. It currently has no working C++ implementation
due to different semantics for enums in C++. For more explanation, see the docs
and testcases.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 222906
OpenCL v2.0 s6.5.5 restricts conversion of pointers to different address spaces:
- the named address spaces (__global, __local, and __private) => __generic - implicitly converted;
- __generic => named - with an explicit cast;
- named <=> named - disallowed;
- __constant <=> any other - disallowed.
llvm-svn: 222834
To support it in the frontend, the following has been added:
- generic address space type attribute;
- documentation for the OpenCL address space attributes;
- parsing of __generic(generic) keyword;
- test code for the parser and diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 222831
We don't yet support pointer-to-member template arguments that have undergone
pointer-to-member conversions, mostly because we don't have a mangling for them yet.
llvm-svn: 222807
GCC and ICC both reject this and the 'Runtime-sized arrays with
automatic storage duration' (N3639) paper forbade this as well.
Previously, we would crash on our way to mangling.
This fixes PR21632.
llvm-svn: 222569
Clang r181627 moved a check for block-scope variables into this code for
handling thread storage class specifiers, but in the process, it broke the
logic for checking if the target supports TLS. Fix this with some simple
restructuring of the code. rdar://problem/18796883
llvm-svn: 222512
for lambda expressions. That can't ever work; we need to transform the
parameters in order to create new ones in the new call operator context.
Fixes a rejects-valid when transforming a context containing a
lambda-expression that uses its function parameters in C++14 mode.
llvm-svn: 222482
Reid Kleckner