LinkerScript used to be a template class, so we couldn't instantiate
that class in elf::link. We instantiated ScriptConfig class earlier
instead so that the linker script parser can store configurations to
the object.
Now that LinkerScript is not a template, it doesn't make sense to
separate ScriptConfig from LinkerScript. This patch merges them.
llvm-svn: 298457
This fixes pr32031 by representing the expressions results as a
SectionBase and offset. This allows us to use an input section
directly instead of getting lost trying to compute an offset in an
outputsection when not all the information is available yet.
This also creates a struct to represent the *value* of and expression,
allowing the expression itself to be a simple typedef. I think this is
easier to read and will make it easier to extend the expression
computation to handle more complicated cases.
llvm-svn: 298079
This also requires postponing the assignment the assignment of
symbols defined in input linker scripts since those can refer to
output sections and in case we don't have a SECTIONS command, we
need to wait until all output sections have been created and
assigned addresses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30851
llvm-svn: 297802
That moves all members that s possible to move for now (all which
does not depend on ELFT templating).
After that change LinkerScript contains only 8 methods in total,
and I believe it is possible to move them all after tweaking other
parts of linker. And we will be able to have single class for
linkerscript at the end.
llvm-svn: 297735
We can move all not templated functionality to LinkerScriptBase.
Patch do that for hasPhdrsCommands() and shows how it helps to detemplate
things in other places.
Probably we should be able to merge these 2 classes into single one after such steps.
Even if not, it still looks as reasonable cleanup for me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30895
llvm-svn: 297714
With this we have a single section hierarchy. It is a bit less code,
but the main advantage will be in a future patch being able to handle
foo = symbol_in_obj;
in a linker script. Currently that fails since we try to find the
output section of symbol_in_obj. With this we should be able to just
return an InputSection from the expression.
llvm-svn: 297313
With the current design an InputSection is basically anything that
goes directly in a OutputSection. That includes plain input section
but also synthetic sections, so this should probably not be a
template.
llvm-svn: 295993
Previously we evaluated the values of LMA incorrectly for next cases:
.text : AT(ADDR(.text) - 0xffffffff80000000) { ... }
.data : AT(ADDR(.data) - 0xffffffff80000000) { ... }
.init.begin : AT(ADDR(.init.begin) - 0xffffffff80000000) { ... }
Reason was that we evaluated offset when VA was not assigned. For case above
we ended up with 3 loads that has similar LMA and it was incorrect.
That is critical for linux kernel.
Patch updates the offset after VA calculation. That fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30163
llvm-svn: 295722
Previously LLD would error out just "ld.lld: error: unable to move location counter backward"
What does not really reveal the place of issue,
Patch adds location to the output.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30187
llvm-svn: 295720
This case should be possible to handle, but it is hard:
* In order to create program headers correctly, we have to scan the
sections in the order they are in the file.
* To find that order, we have to "execute" the linker script.
* The linker script can contain SIZEOF_HEADERS.
So to support this we have to start with a guess of how many headers
we need (3), run the linker script and try to create the program
headers. If it turns out we need more headers, we run the script again
with a larger SIZEOF_HEADERS.
Also, running the linker script depends on knowing the size of the
sections, so we have to finalize them. But creating the program
headers can change the value stored in some sections, so we have to
split size finalization and content finalization.
Looks like the last part is also needed for range extension thunks, so
we might support this at some point. For now just report an error
instead of producing broken files.
llvm-svn: 295458
As specified here:
* https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/MEMORY.html#MEMORY
There are two deviations from what is specified for GNU ld:
1. Only integer constants and *not* constant expressions
are allowed in `LENGTH` and `ORIGIN` initializations.
2. The `I` and `L` attributes are *not* implemented.
With (1) there is currently no easy way to evaluate integer
only constant expressions. This can be enhanced in the
future.
With (2) it isn't clear how these flags map to the `SHF_*`
flags or if they even make sense for an ELF linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28911
llvm-svn: 292875
The feature is documented as
-----------------------------
The format of the dynamic list is the same as the version node
without scope and node name. See *note VERSION:: for more
information.
--------------------------------
And indeed qt uses a dynamic list with an 'extern "C++"' in it. With
this patch we support that
The change to gc-sections-shared makes us match bfd. Just because we
kept bar doesn't mean it has to be in the dynamic symbol table.
The changes to invalid-dynamic-list.test and reproduce.s are because
of the new parser.
The changes to version-script.s are the only case where we change
behavior with regards to bfd, but I would like to see a mix of
--version-script and --dynamic-list used in the wild before
complicating the code.
llvm-svn: 289082
Linker script doesn't create a section if it has no content. So the following
script doesn't create .norelocs section if it doesn't have any .rel* sections.
.norelocs : { *(.rel*) }
Later, if you assert that the size of .norelocs is 0, LLD printed out
an error message, because it didn't allow calling SIZEOF() on nonexistent
sections.
This patch allows SIZEOF() on nonexistent sections, so that you can do
something like this.
ASSERT(SIZEOF(.norelocs), "shouldn't contain .rel sections!")
Note that this behavior is compatible with GNU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26810
llvm-svn: 287257
Propagate program headers by walking the commands, not the
sections. This allows us to propagate program headers even from
sections that don't end up in the output.
Fixes pr30997.
llvm-svn: 286837
The disadvantage is that we use uint64_t instad of uint32_t for some
value in 32 bit files. The advantage is a substantially simpler code,
faster builds and less code duplication.
llvm-svn: 286414
Previously, we do this piece of code to iterate over all input sections.
for (elf::ObjectFile<ELFT> *F : Symtab.getObjectFiles())
for (InputSectionBase<ELFT> *S : F->getSections())
It turned out that this mechanisms doesn't work well with synthetic
input sections because synthetic input sections don't belong to any
input file.
This patch defines a vector that contains all input sections including
synthetic ones.
llvm-svn: 286051
Rui Ueyama