The following appears in OpenMP 3.1 sec. 2.9.1.1 as a predetermined
data-sharing attribute:
> Variables with const-qualified type having no mutable member are
> shared.
It does not appear in OpenmP 4.0, 4.5, or 5.0. This patch removes the
implementation of that attribute when the requested OpenMP version is
greater than 3.1.
One effect of that removal is that `default(none)` affects const
variables without mutable members.
Also, without this patch, if a const variable without mutable members
was explicitly lastprivate or private, it was an error because it was
predetermined shared. Now, clang instead complains that it's const
without mutable fields, which is a more intelligible diagnostic. That
should be fine for all of the above versions because they all have
something like the following, which is quoted from OpenMP 5.0
sec. 2.19.3:
> A variable that is privatized must not have a const-qualified type
> unless it is of class type with a mutable member. This restriction does
> not apply to the firstprivate clause.
reduction and linear clauses already have separate checks for const
variables. Future patches will merge the implementations.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56113
llvm-svn: 350439
being shared.
According to the standard, the variables with unspecified data-sharing
attributes in presence of `default(none)` clause must be reported to
users. Compiler did not generate error reports for the variables used in
other OpenMP regions. Patch fixes this.
llvm-svn: 345533
only.
Added support for -fopenmp-simd option that allows compilation of
simd-based constructs without emission of OpenMP runtime calls.
llvm-svn: 321560
distribute directives.
OpenMP standard does not allow to mark the variables as firstprivate and lastprivate at the same time in distribute-based directives. Patch fixes this problem.
llvm-svn: 319560
If the member declaration is captured in the OMPCapturedExprDecl, we may
loose data-sharing attribute info for this declaration. Patch fixes this
bug.
llvm-svn: 308629
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273884
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273705
Alexey Bataev