Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
Summary:
If the build path is short, `Line` field can end up fitting on the same line as `File`,
but the `{{.*}}` would consume it. Keeping in mind rL293149, i think we can fix it,
while keeping it working when there are and there are not any quotations.
At least this fixes this test for me.
Reviewers: anemet, aaron.ballman, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49348
llvm-svn: 337249
The handler that deals with IR passed/missed/analysis remarks is extended to
also handle the corresponding MIR remarks.
The more thorough testing in done via llc (rL293113, rL293121). Here we just
make sure that the functionality is accessible through clang.
llvm-svn: 293146
Francis Visoiu Mistrih