..and use it to control that parts of CUDA compilation
that depend on the specific version of CUDA SDK.
This patch has a placeholder for a 'new launch API' support
which is in a separate patch. The list will be further
extended in the upcoming patch to support CUDA-10.1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57487
llvm-svn: 352798
Clang can use CUDA-9.1 now, though new APIs (are not implemented yet.
The major change is that headers in CUDA-9.1 went through substantial
changes that started in CUDA-9.0 which required substantial changes
in the cuda compatibility headers provided by clang.
There are two major issues:
* CUDA SDK no longer provides declarations for libdevice functions.
* A lot of device-side functions have become nvcc's builtins and
CUDA headers no longer contain their implementations.
This patch changes the way CUDA headers are handled if we compile
with CUDA 9.x. Both 9.0 and 9.1 are affected.
* Clang provides its own declarations of libdevice functions.
* For CUDA-9.x clang now provides implementation of device-side
'standard library' functions using libdevice.
This patch should not affect compilation with CUDA-8. There may be
some observable differences for CUDA-9.0, though they are not expected
to affect functionality.
Tested: CUDA test-suite tests for all supported combinations of:
CUDA: 7.0,7.5,8.0,9.0,9.1
GPU: sm_20, sm_35, sm_60, sm_70
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42513
llvm-svn: 323713
Summary:
CUDA 9's minimum sm is sm_30.
Ideally we should also make sm_30 the default when compiling with CUDA
9, but that seems harder than it should be.
Subscribers: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39109
llvm-svn: 316611
For now CUDA-9 is not included in the list of CUDA versions clang
searches for, so the path to CUDA-9 must be explicitly passed
via --cuda-path=.
On LLVM side NVPTX added sm_70 GPU type which bumps required
PTX version to 6.0, but otherwise is equivalent to sm_62 at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37576
llvm-svn: 312734
Some compilers are too dumb to realize that the switch statement covers
all cases.
(Don't use a "default" label, because we explicitly want to get a warning
if our switch doesn't cover all the cases.)
llvm-svn: 274713
Summary:
Currently our handling of CUDA architectures is scattered all around
clang. This patch centralizes it.
A key advantage of this centralization is that you can now write a C++
switch on e.g. CudaArch and get a compile error if you don't handle one
of the enum values.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21867
llvm-svn: 274681
Yaxun Liu