Some targets such as Python 2.7.16 still use VERSION in
their builds. Without VERSION defined, the source code
has syntax errors.
Reverting as it will probably break many other things.
Noticed by Sterling Augustine
llvm-svn: 365992
Summary:
It has been introduced in 2011 for gcc compat:
ad1a4c6e89
it is probably time to remove it
Reviewers: rnk, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64062
llvm-svn: 365962
This affects users of older (pre 2.26) binutils in such a way that they can't necessarily
work around it as it doesn't support the compress option on the command line. Reverting
to unblock them and we can revisit whether to make this change now or fix how we want
to express the option.
This reverts commit bdb21337e6e1732c9895966449c33c408336d295/r360403.
llvm-svn: 360703
Since July 15, 2015 (binutils-gdb commit
19a7fe52ae3d0971e67a134bcb1648899e21ae1c, included in 2.26), gas
--compress-debug-sections=zlib (gcc -gz) means zlib-gabi:
SHF_COMPRESSED. Before that it meant zlib-gnu (.zdebug).
clang's -gz was introduced in rC306115 (Jun 2017) to indicate zlib-gnu. It
is 2019 now and it is not unreasonable to assume users of the new
feature to have new linkers (ld.bfd/gold >= 2.26, lld >= rLLD273661).
Change clang's default accordingly to improve standard conformance.
zlib-gnu becomes out of fashion and gets poorer toolchain support.
Its mangled names confuse tools and are more likely to cause problems.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61689
llvm-svn: 360403
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for formatting C# files with clang-format, I know the barrier to entry is high here so I'm sending this revision in to test the water as to whether this might be something we'd consider landing.
Tracking in Bugzilla as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Justification:
C# code just looks ugly in comparison to the C++ code in our source tree which is clang-formatted.
I've struggled with Visual Studio reformatting to get a clean and consistent style, I want to format our C# code on saving like I do now for C++ and i want it to have the same style as defined in our .clang-format file, so it consistent as it can be with C++. (Braces/Breaking/Spaces/Indent etc..)
Using clang format without this patch leaves the code in a bad state, sometimes when the BreakStringLiterals is set, it fails to compile.
Mostly the C# is similar to Java, except instead of JavaAnnotations I try to reuse the TT_AttributeSquare.
Almost the most valuable portion is to have a new Language in order to partition the configuration for C# within a common .clang-format file, with the auto detection on the .cs extension. But there are other C# specific styles that could be added later if this is accepted. in particular how `{ set;get }` is formatted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir, benhamilton, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58404
llvm-svn: 356662
Add an install target for clang's API headers, which allows them to be
included in distributions. The install rules already existed, but they
lacked a component and a target, making them only accessible via a full
install. These headers are useful for writing clang-based tooling, for
example. They're the clang equivalent to the llvm-headers target and
complement the clang-libraries target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58317
llvm-svn: 355853
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
This is a fix for https://reviews.llvm.org/D51229 where we pass the
address_space qualified type as the modified type of an AttributedType. This
change now instead wraps the AttributedType with either the address_space
qualifier or a DependentAddressSpaceType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55447
llvm-svn: 351997
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351105
Summary: The change itself landed as r348365, see the comment for more details.
Reviewers: arphaman, EricWF
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55322
llvm-svn: 348394
When debugging a boost build with a modified
version of Clang, I discovered that the PTH implementation
stores TokenKind in 8 bits. However, we currently have 368
TokenKinds.
The result is that the value gets truncated and the wrong token
gets picked up when including PTH files. It seems that this will
go wrong every time someone uses a token that uses the 9th bit.
Upon asking on IRC, it was brought up that this was a highly
experimental features that was considered a failure. I discovered
via googling that BoostBuild (mostly Boost.Math) is the only user of
this
feature, using the CC1 flag directly. I believe that this can be
transferred over to normal PCH with minimal effort:
https://github.com/boostorg/build/issues/367
Based on advice on IRC and research showing that this is a nearly
completely unused feature, this patch removes it entirely.
Note: I considered leaving the build-flags in place and making them
emit an error/warning, however since I've basically identified and
warned the only user, it seemed better to just remove them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54547
Change-Id: If32744275ef1f585357bd6c1c813d96973c4d8d9
llvm-svn: 348266
Summary:
clang has `-Wextra-semi` (D43162), which is not dictated by the currently selected standard.
While that is great, there is at least one more source of need-less semis - 'null statements'.
Sometimes, they are needed:
```
for(int x = 0; continueToDoWork(x); x++)
; // Ugly code, but the semi is needed here.
```
But sometimes they are just there for no reason:
```
switch(X) {
case 0:
return -2345;
case 5:
return 0;
default:
return 42;
}; // <- oops
;;;;;;;;;;; <- OOOOPS, still not diagnosed. Clearly this is junk.
```
Additionally:
```
if(; // <- empty init-statement
true)
;
switch (; // empty init-statement
x) {
...
}
for (; // <- empty init-statement
int y : S())
;
}
As usual, things may or may not go sideways in the presence of macros.
While evaluating this diag on my codebase of interest, it was unsurprisingly
discovered that Google Test macros are *very* prone to this.
And it seems many issues are deep within the GTest itself, not
in the snippets passed from the codebase that uses GTest.
So after some thought, i decided not do issue a diagnostic if the semi
is within *any* macro, be it either from the normal header, or system header.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 | PR39111 ]]
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, efriedma
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52695
llvm-svn: 347339
Summary:
As reported by @regehr (thanks!) on twitter (https://twitter.com/johnregehr/status/1057681496255815686),
we (me) has completely forgot about the binary assignment operator.
In AST, it isn't represented as separate `ImplicitCastExpr`'s,
but as a single `CompoundAssignOperator`, that does all the casts internally.
Which means, out of these two, only the first one is diagnosed:
```
auto foo() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c = c + 1;
return c;
}
auto bar() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
https://godbolt.org/z/JNyVc4
This patch does handle the `CompoundAssignOperator`:
```
int main() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
```
$ ./bin/clang -g -fsanitize=integer /tmp/test.c && ./a.out
/tmp/test.c:3:5: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value 256 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned char' changed the value to 0 (8-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x2392b8 in main /tmp/test.c:3:5
#1 0x7fec4a612b16 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22b16)
#2 0x214029 in _start (/build/llvm-build-GCC-release/a.out+0x214029)
```
However, the pre/post increment/decrement is still not handled.
Reviewers: rsmith, regehr, vsk, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949
llvm-svn: 347258
Summary:
the previous patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rC346642) has been reverted because of test failure under windows.
So this patch fix the test cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage-filter.c.
Reviewers: marco-c
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: cfe-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54600
llvm-svn: 347144
Summary:
These options are taking regex separated by colons to filter files.
- if both are empty then all files are instrumented
- if -fprofile-filter-files is empty then all the filenames matching any of the regex from exclude are not instrumented
- if -fprofile-exclude-files is empty then all the filenames matching any of the regex from filter are instrumented
- if both aren't empty then all the filenames which match any of the regex in filter and which don't match all the regex in filter are instrumented
- this patch is a follow-up of https://reviews.llvm.org/D52033
Reviewers: marco-c, vsk
Reviewed By: marco-c, vsk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52034
llvm-svn: 346642
This is the second half of Implicit Integer Conversion Sanitizer.
It completes the first half, and finally makes the sanitizer
fully functional! Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
void consume(unsigned int val);
void test(int val) {
consume(val);
// The 'val' is `signed int`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If val is negative, then consume() will be operating on a large
// unsigned value, and you may or may not have a bug.
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// Making the conversion explicit silences the sanitizer.
consume((unsigned int)val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wsign-conversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, likely there are cases where it does **not** warn.
The actual detection is pretty easy. We just need to check each of the values
whether it is negative, and equality-compare the results of those comparisons.
The unsigned value is obviously non-negative. Zero is non-negative too.
https://godbolt.org/g/w93oj2
We do not have to emit the check *always*, there are obvious situations
where we can avoid emitting it, since it would **always** get optimized-out.
But i do think the tautological IR (`icmp ult %x, 0`, which is always false)
should be emitted, and the middle-end should cleanup it.
This sanitizer is in the `-fsanitize=implicit-conversion` group,
and is a logical continuation of D48958 `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
As for the ordering, i'we opted to emit the check **after**
`-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`. At least on these simple 16 test cases,
this results in 1 of the 12 emitted checks being optimized away,
as compared to 0 checks being optimized away if the order is reversed.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D50251.
Finishes fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Finishes partially fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Finishes fixing https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940.
Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Reviewers: vsk, rsmith, rjmccall, #sanitizers, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: chandlerc, filcab, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250
llvm-svn: 345660
This reverts commit r345487, which reverted r345486. I think the crashes were
caused by an OOM on the builder, trying again to confirm...
llvm-svn: 345517
This commit enables pushing an empty #pragma clang attribute push, then adding
multiple attributes to it, then popping them all with #pragma clang attribute
pop, just like #pragma clang diagnostic. We still support the current way of
adding these, #pragma clang attribute push(__attribute__((...))), by treating it
like a combined push/attribute. This is needed to create macros like:
DO_SOMETHING_BEGIN(attr1, attr2, attr3)
// ...
DO_SOMETHING_END
rdar://45496947
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53621
llvm-svn: 345486
Summary:
- Add `UETT_PreferredAlignOf` to account for the difference between `__alignof` and `alignof`
- `AlignOfType` now returns ABI alignment instead of preferred alignment iff clang-abi-compat > 7, and one uses _Alignof or alignof
Patch by Nicole Mazzuca!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53207
llvm-svn: 345419
This can be used to preserve profiling information across codebase
changes that have widespread impact on mangled names, but across which
most profiling data should still be usable. For example, when switching
from libstdc++ to libc++, or from the old libstdc++ ABI to the new ABI,
or even from a 32-bit to a 64-bit build.
The user can provide a remapping file specifying parts of mangled names
that should be treated as equivalent (eg, std::__1 should be treated as
equivalent to std::__cxx11), and profile data will be treated as
applying to a particular function if its name is equivalent to the name
of a function in the profile data under the provided equivalences. See
the documentation change for a description of how this is configured.
Remapping is supported for both sample-based profiling and instruction
profiling. We do not support remapping indirect branch target
information, but all other profile data should be remapped
appropriately.
Support is only added for the new pass manager. If someone wants to also
add support for this for the old pass manager, doing so should be
straightforward.
llvm-svn: 344199
With clang-cl, when the user specifies /Yc or /Yu without a filename
the compiler uses a #pragma hdrstop in the main source file to
determine the end of the PCH. If a header is specified with /Yc or
/Yu #pragma hdrstop has no effect.
The optional #pragma hdrstop filename argument is not yet supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51391
llvm-svn: 341963
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
unsigned char store = 0;
bool consume(unsigned int val);
void test(unsigned long val) {
if (consume(val)) {
// the 'val' is `unsigned long`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If their bit widths are different on this platform, the implicit
// truncation happens. And if that `unsigned long` had a value bigger
// than UINT_MAX, then you may or may not have a bug.
// Similarly, integer addition happens on `int`s, so `store` will
// be promoted to an `int`, the sum calculated (0+768=768),
// and the result demoted to `unsigned char`, and stored to `store`.
// In this case, the `store` will still be 0. Again, not always intended.
store = store + 768; // before addition, 'store' was promoted to int.
}
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// You can either make the conversion explicit
(void)consume((unsigned int)val);
// or mask the value so no bits will be *implicitly* lost.
(void)consume((~((unsigned int)0)) & val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wconversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, there are cases where it does **not** warn.
So a Sanitizer is needed. I don't have any motivational numbers, but i know
i had this kind of problem 10-20 times, and it was never easy to track down.
The logic to detect whether an truncation has happened is pretty simple
if you think about it - https://godbolt.org/g/NEzXbb - basically, just
extend (using the new, not original!, signedness) the 'truncated' value
back to it's original width, and equality-compare it with the original value.
The most non-trivial thing here is the logic to detect whether this
`ImplicitCastExpr` AST node is **actually** an implicit conversion, //or//
part of an explicit cast. Because the explicit casts are modeled as an outer
`ExplicitCastExpr` with some `ImplicitCastExpr`'s as **direct** children.
https://godbolt.org/g/eE1GkJ
Nowadays, we can just use the new `part_of_explicit_cast` flag, which is set
on all the implicitly-added `ImplicitCastExpr`'s of an `ExplicitCastExpr`.
So if that flag is **not** set, then it is an actual implicit conversion.
As you may have noted, this isn't just named `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
There are potentially some more implicit conversions to be warned about.
Namely, implicit conversions that result in sign change; implicit conversion
between different floating point types, or between fp and an integer,
when again, that conversion is lossy.
One thing i know isn't handled is bitfields.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D48959.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Partially fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940. (other than sign-changing implicit conversions)
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, samsonov, pcc, vsk, eugenis, efriedma, kcc, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith, vsk, erichkeane
Subscribers: erichkeane, klimek, #sanitizers, aaron.ballman, RKSimon, dtzWill, filcab, danielaustin, ygribov, dvyukov, milianw, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
llvm-svn: 338288
Sylvestre Ledru